Committee Summary for House Transportation (01/27/2026)

Bill/Time	Type	Title	Sponsor
HB1482 00:08:49.360 - 9:04:25 AM	Public Hearing	authorizing the department of motor vehicles to adopt seasonal tourism-themed license plates.	Cahill, Michael(D)[CT]2025
HB1078 00:24:37.200 - 9:20:13 AM	Public Hearing	creating a gold star family and gold star father license plate.	Murphy, Michael(R)[IN]2025
HB1560 00:50:41.920 - 9:46:17 AM	Public Hearing	relative to annual motor vehicle inspection standards and reinstatement.	Leishman, Peter(D)[D-]2025
HB1703 01:16:14.560 - 10:11:50 AM	Public Hearing	relative to establishing a registration fee for bicycles and electric bicycles using state or municipally funded bike paths, trails, or roadways.	Walsh, Thomas(R)[B-]2025
HB1176 0197h 04:43:34.400 - 1:39:10 PM	Executive Session	relative to the display of license plates on vehicles.	Notter, Jeanine(R)[A-]2025
HB1111 0342h 05:02:56.000 - 1:58:32 PM	Executive Session	relative to driving test accommodations and retest suspension periods.	Smith, Steven(R)[B]2025
HB1421 0309h 05:30:52.400 - 2:26:28 PM	Executive Session	modifying title exemptions for motor vehicles manufactured before the year 2000.	Granger, Michael(R)[A+]2025
HB1430 05:59:45.520 - 2:55:21 PM	Executive Session	relative to title registration requirements for motorcycles.	Read, Ellen(D)[D]2025
HB1445 06:02:46.080 - 2:58:22 PM	Executive Session	requiring the issuance of enhanced drivers licenses and Real ID compliant cards for border crossing and proof of citizenship.	Johnson, Erik(D)[F]2025
HB1078 06:08:51.600 - 3:04:27 PM	Executive Session	creating a gold star family and gold star father license plate.	Murphy, Michael(R)[IN]2025

HB1482: Representative Cahill Support00:08:49.360 - 9:04:25 AM; Representative Cahill, the prime sponsor, introduced HB 1482 to replace the Old Man of the Mountain graphic on license plates with four alternating designs representing New Hampshire's seasonal scenic and recreational attractions. He emphasized that this would serve as free advertising to boost tourism, an important industry for the state, without changing the state motto or plates on state vehicles. He shared that he emailed testimony with color pictures to avoid printing costs and expressed flexibility on implementation details.
HB1482: Jennifer Olri, Department of Motor Vehicles Information Only00:16:54.000 - 9:12:30 AM; Jennifer Olri, administrator of the Bureau of Registration at the DMV, provided information on the bill without taking a position. She discussed the fiscal note, estimated at $45,000 per plate design based on the bill's language, but noted it could change if plates are added rather than replaced. She confirmed collaboration with Travel and Tourism is feasible and addressed questions on plate readability, distribution to municipalities, and the need to adjust inventory for even seasonal distribution, which may impact current programming.
HB1078: Representative Arnold Davis (introducing for Representative Michael Murphy) Support00:24:37.200 - 9:20:13 AM; Representative Davis introduced HB 1078 on behalf of Representative Murphy from Gorham, NH, to create a Gold Star family and Gold Star father license plate. He highlighted that the bill recognizes the sacrifice of Gold Star families beyond just mothers, noting a previous similar bill was set aside due to high costs, but updated manufacturing has reduced the fiscal note to $25,000-$50,000. He urged the committee to vote ought to pass, emphasizing it's a small request for those who have sacrificed much.
HB1078: Leon Ride Out Support00:27:00.400 - 9:22:36 AM; Leon Ride Out, a 26-year Marine Corps veteran who served in Desert Shield/Storm and Iraqi Freedom, spoke in support. He shared how his unit embraced all Gold Star families, not just mothers, during and after deployments, noting their challenges on the home front. He argued the plate is a small recognition for their service and sacrifice, especially with the reduced fiscal note of $25,000, which he views as a worthwhile expense compared to other state spending.
HB1078: Representative Lori Kors Support00:32:26.159 - 9:28:02 AM; Representative Kors from Coos District 7 supported HB 1078, dedicating it to Staff Sergeant Tanner Wolf Groan from Gorham, NH, killed in a 2023 helicopter crash at age 25. She explained the bill extends recognition to Gold Star fathers and family members, as grief affects all equally, aligning with the 2015 federal Gold Star Fathers Act. She noted meetings with Tanner's parents and DMV Commissioner Marasco confirmed no significant cost or burden due to the new plate system, urging passage to honor fallen heroes and their families.
HB1078: Erica Grown, Gorham, New Hampshire Support00:35:58.880 - 9:31:34 AM; Erica Grown shares her personal tragedy of losing her son Tanner in a helicopter crash in Cyprus on November 10th, 2023. She displays her Gold Star Mother's plate with 'NSDQ' (Nightstalkers Don't Quit) and advocates for the bill to allow her husband a Gold Star Father's plate and her daughter a Gold Star Family plate. She emphasizes their family teamwork in raising children, respecting decisions, and participating in school activities. She describes the close sibling bond between Tanner and Emily, who understood each other deeply. Erica argues that recognition should extend to the entire Gold Star family, not just the mother, and notes other states offer such plates. She urges passage to avoid other families pleading similarly.
HB1560: Representative Peter Leechman, Hillsboro 33 (Peterborough and Sharon) Support00:50:41.920 - 9:46:17 AM; Representative Leechman introduces HB 1560 to reinstate vehicle inspections repealed by HB 649 last year, which passed the House bipartisanly but stalled in the Senate. He notes a Senate amendment to HB 649 is being offered today, supported by law enforcement, auto dealers, and safety groups, though he hasn't seen it. The bill exempts vehicles under 3 years old from inspections. He suggests the bill may be unnecessary if the Senate's version is adopted, as the House can't act immediately.
HB1560: Representative Michael Granger Oppose00:56:51.839 - 9:52:27 AM; Representative Granger opposes HB 1560, believing a solution will emerge from HB 649 via Senate amendment, possibly defining roadside stops by police. He agrees the bill may not be needed and recommends an Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL) motion to await HB 649's outcome.
HB1560: Jeremy Olsen, New Hampshire Motorist Freedom Organization Oppose00:58:11.839 - 9:53:47 AM; Jeremy Olsen opposes reinstating inspections, recalling strong public support last year for repeal via HB 649 through emails to the committee and Senate. He threatens renewed grassroots efforts if needed. He would accept a 'fix-it ticket' for negligent vehicles as a compromise but firmly opposes full inspections.
HB1560: Jim Moody, New Hampshire Motorcyclists Rights Organization Support01:00:11.760 - 9:55:47 AM; Jim Moody supports inspections for safety, focusing on tires, brakes, and lights crucial for motorcyclists and all vehicles. He advocates for amendments emphasizing safety and aims to keep all motorists safe through such a program.
HB1560: Aubrey Freriedman, Bridgewater Oppose01:01:27.920 - 9:57:03 AM; Aubrey Freriedman opposes the bill, reiterating arguments from HB 649 testimony. He cites California's lack of safety inspections (only smog checks), notes only 14 states require them, and references studies showing no significant safety differences. Insurance rates aren't lower in inspecting states. He shares a personal example of unnecessary $500 windshield repair demand despite prior passes, calling the program a boondoggle, and urges keeping it repealed.
HB1560: Jay Olry, New Hampshire Auto Dealers Association Information Only01:04:12.319 - 9:59:48 AM; Jay Olry supports vehicle safety and a state inspection program focused on basic standards to foster a culture of maintenance and responsibility. While appreciating HB 1560, NHADA cannot support it as written and suggests evolving the program, possibly with state-conducted inspections for transparency. He notes New Jersey's recent reinstatement of basic inspections to address rising traffic deaths, countering claims no state has reversed repeal.
HB1560: Mike Fitzgerald, New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Information Only01:07:30.799 - 10:03:06 AM; Mike Fitzgerald explains the six-month delay in implementing HB 2's repeal: the department submitted complex documentation to EPA by the December 24th deadline, including state implementation plan revisions and opting out of the Ozone Transport Region. This involved detailed air emissions analysis, hearings, and comment periods under the Clean Air Act.
HB1703: Representative Tom Walsh, Merrimack District 10 (Hooksett and Dunbarton) Information Only01:16:14.560 - 10:11:50 AM; Representative Walsh, the bill sponsor, explains that the bill was introduced as a flawed first draft due to legislative constraints on redrafts. He clarifies misconceptions: no intent to register children's bikes or require adult registrations on streets; the $50 fee was a placeholder. The goal was a user fee for state-funded bike infrastructure, similar to ORVs and snowmobiles, to offset highway fund shortfalls used for bike paths. He notes challenges with multi-source funding and decides the bill likely won't advance, suggesting it sparks discussion on funding. He fields questions on jurisdiction, enforcement for visitors, and specific infrastructure.
HB1703: Representative Timothy O'Brien, Strafford County District 10 (Durham) Oppose01:29:33.199 - 10:25:09 AM; O'Brien opposes the bill, calling it the most unpopular idea, even the sponsor backed off. He argues against user fees for non-motorized vehicles like bikes and pedestrians, contrasting with ORVs/snowmobiles due to ubiquity and low external costs. At a time of recent fee increases, it's unwise. Bike paths benefit drivers by separating cyclists. He clarifies the General Sullivan Bridge project was legally required for pedestrian access. Urges killing the bill without compromise.
HB1703: Paul Cameron, Portsmouth Oppose01:34:58.080 - 10:30:34 AM; Cameron, a 40-year road biker, initially worried the bill would hurt tourism by deterring visitors. After the sponsor's clarification excluding children's bikes, many concerns are addressed. He suggests temporary passes for visitors but appreciates the updates and keeps testimony brief.
HB1703: Matt Co, nurse at Dartmouth Health (Lebanon/Contoocook) Oppose01:36:39.280 - 10:32:15 AM; Co strongly opposes, noting the bill's unpopularity even among proponents. Bike paths enhance community health and quality of life. Requiring stickers for casual rides, like to the grocery store with kids, is the wrong direction for New Hampshire.
HB1703: Constantina Marshman, Gate City Bike Co-op (Nashua) Oppose01:37:42.639 - 10:33:18 AM; Marshman represents a co-op providing free bikes to low-income people for jobs and self-sufficiency. A registration fee would burden those without means for basics like food. Implementing it involves costly infrastructure (DMV, enforcement), not free. Supports bike infrastructure but not via user fees; cyclists already pay via car registrations, and bikes cause minimal wear. Notes trails are used by pedestrians, skaters, horses—should all pay? Society should support active transport.
HB1703: Ben Bassett, Alton Oppose01:40:51.199 - 10:36:27 AM; Bassett was infuriated upon learning of the bill, fearing police chasing kids without stickers. It discourages obese children from biking, promoting screens instead. He pays high fees for cars, snowmobiles, ATVs, yet rides rail trails on bikes too. Impacts vulnerable families most; glad the bill seems dead.
HB1703: Donna Cusk, Hudson Oppose01:42:49.920 - 10:38:25 AM; Cusk opposes adamantly, drawing from California experience with free trails funded by car registrations. Charging fees discourages cycling, tourism, and visits from Massachusetts (developing rail trails). She'd cross the border to avoid fees, diverting economic benefits like stops at local shops. Encourage biking in this beautiful state.
HB1703: Adalie Cassine, Hanover Oppose01:44:38.400 - 10:40:14 AM; Cassine, a high school senior and club cyclist, says a $50 fee penalizes healthy activity, especially for financially struggling college students or families. Discourages kids from screens, impacts tourists, and hurts New Hampshire's trail reputation compared to Massachusetts. Do not advance this mistake.
HB1703: Judy Hoffinger, Guilford Oppose01:46:33.600 - 10:42:09 AM; Hoffinger encourages exercise via biking for health (physical/mental endorphins), family visits. Can't imagine $50 per bike for occasional use. Differs from snowmobiling (less exercise). Hopes bill fails to promote recreation.
HB1703: Fidelma McKenna, Concord Oppose01:48:20.639 - 10:43:56 AM; McKenna biked in 8° weather to oppose. As a nurse midwife, she highlights biking's role in reducing air pollution amid New Hampshire's Ozone Transport Commission withdrawal, saving health costs from ozone-related issues. Disincentivizing biking harms community health.
HB1703: Captain Mike Eastman, NH Fish and Game Oppose01:49:06.400 - 10:44:42 AM; Eastman, on behalf of the commission, opposes due to flawed fund dissemination to trails (not all DOT-connected; involves Bureau of Trails). Trails face damage (e.g., Hinsdale rail trail flood). Suggests fees for e-bikes (motorized impact) like ORVs/snowmobiles, not pedal bikes. Notes complaints on mountain bikes damaging snowmobile trails.
HB1703: Thaddius Nadusac, Guilford Oppose01:51:53.040 - 10:47:29 AM; Nadusac has 10 bikes for family; won't pay $500/year. Biking promotes health, family bonding. Spread costs via car registrations/school taxes for societal good, reducing healthcare needs.
HB1703: Jamie Schwinnard Oppose01:53:49.520 - 10:49:25 AM; Schwinnard addresses funding: leverage bike club memberships for volunteer help/maintenance, costing state less. On the bill: Amid high living costs ($2K annual shortfall for average family of 4), $50 fee barriers recreation, transport, family bonding for many. No exemptions; $100 fine for non-compliance. State costs $500K+ for Safety Dept; needs 10K registrations to break even—unaffordable. Vote no for affordable freedom.
HB1703: Erica Russell, Concord Oppose01:59:21.199 - 10:54:57 AM; Russell, avid cyclist, opposes as written (ignoring sponsor's intent). Bikes don't harm environment like motors; taxing them is a 'clean air penalty' (unlike hikes/walks). Questions equity (homeless vs. racers), enforcement (police stops, out-of-staters, DMV burden). For low-income, it's a work barrier; encourages outdoor play. DMV should regulate motors only.
HB1703: John Lewick Oppose02:02:23.840 - 10:57:59 AM; Lewick quotes conservative president against taxing movement. Biking keeps him healthy post-medical issues. Nashua River Rail Trail is privately funded with contribution signs—accept donations instead. Avoid Massachusetts-style taxes; don't 'mass up' New Hampshire.
HB1703: Ian McGregor, Concord Oppose02:04:11.599 - 10:59:47 AM; McGregor, carless engineer on Concord's transportation committee, focuses on reducing congestion/safety via getting cars off roads. Bill impedes cycling as transport. Costly road fixes don't solve long-term; need mode shift. Discourages cyclists, including current ones. Suggests regulating 'e-motos' (throttle e-bikes >10mph) separately from true bikes to address issues without broad fees.
HB1703: Alan Rhettz, Plainfield Oppose02:08:23.520 - 11:03:59 AM; Alan Rhettz, a resident of Plainfield, opposes HB1703, arguing that while he appreciates attention to bicycle infrastructure, the bill is impractical and would have unintended consequences. He notes that only Hawaii has a similar bike registration fee, and states like Montana and Oregon rejected it due to high administrative costs. He highlights the impact on tourism, as organizations like Adventure Cycling would warn members about the fee and $100 fine, potentially deterring visitors amid declining Canadian tourism. Rhettz emphasizes bicycles' role in rural communities for managing distances and addressing food insecurity, citing studies from the Rural Health Information Hub, Monadnock region, and UNH. He asserts that cyclists and drivers already contribute through taxes and fees, and questions proof of ownership for older bikes like his 17-year-old one.
HB1703: Tim Blackden, Friends of the Contoocook River Greenway Rail Trail Oppose02:12:34.079 - 11:08:10 AM; Tim Blackden, representing Friends of the Contoocook River Greenway Rail Trail, opposes the bill, noting that rail trails have more pedestrians and dog walkers than cyclists, so registration fees would burden minority users. He highlights responsible e-bike use and diversified funding from private donations, federal funds, and corporations, not solely the highway fund. Blackden credits the bill with mobilizing 12,000 cyclists, including 7,900 who wrote opposition, calling it unpopular. He promotes cycling for public health, exercise, and economic benefits like preserving green space, and responds to committee questions on trail locations (Concord, Hopkinton, Warner, Bradford, Newbury), maintenance costs ($1,000-$2,000 per mile), adoption models, state funding gaps, and DOT cooperation for rail trails.
HB1703: Mike Affleberg, United Way Oppose02:20:56.800 - 11:16:32 AM; Mike Affleberg from United Way opposes HB1703, describing cyclists in the greater Nashua region as using bikes for essential transportation like work, medical appointments, and errands, even in winter. He shares anecdotes of low-income clients arriving by bike in extreme cold for laptop distributions. Affleberg hopes the bill goes to interim study or is found inexpedient, viewing it as a hodgepodge of motivations. He opposes fees for casual family biking and separates recreation funding from basic needs. He notes authorization from the Nashua Chamber of Commerce to oppose based on workforce needs.
HB1703: Paula Badard, Goffstown Oppose02:22:55.680 - 11:18:31 AM; Paula Badard from Goffstown, former board president of BikeWalk Alliance of New Hampshire, certified bike safety instructor, and member of the NH Traffic Safety Commission, opposes the bill. She advocates for investing tax dollars in bike and walking infrastructure over car-centric policies. Badard suggests viable alternatives like a bike-friendly license plate program or an optional 'Bike Safe Card' similar to the Hike Safe Card for funding. She urges partnering with bike advocacy organizations, including them in study committees, and notes the bill's opposition stems from their networks. She addresses e-bikes, emphasizing issues with 'out-of-class' e-bikes and ongoing legislation.
HB1703: Charles Redford, Keene, representing Pathways for Keene Oppose02:27:11.520 - 11:22:47 AM; Charles Redford from Keene, founder of Pathways for Keene and former city councilor, opposes the bill, focusing on tourism benefits of biking. He highlights the Great American Bike Tour company based in NH, which brings tourists for multi-day rides supporting inns and restaurants, and potential use of Keene's trails in the Monadnock region. Redford notes raising over $1 million for TAP grants matched by the city (10% local, 80% federal). He mentions World Atlas featuring Keene as a biking hidden gem, media coverage of northern trails, and homeless individuals relying on bikes for transportation due to affordability, with community bike racks supporting them.
HB1703: Aubrey Freriedman, self Oppose02:31:32.560 - 11:27:08 AM; Aubrey Freriedman opposes HB1703, appreciating the chair's candor on the bill's origins and shortcomings. She compares it to the recently eliminated car inspection program, arguing it would create unnecessary bureaucracy, requiring more DMV staff and diverting law enforcement from real crimes to ticketing. While not opposed to user fees in principle for road-wearing vehicles like cars and trucks, she finds them impractical for bicycles.
HB1703: Dave McFerson, Hooksett Oppose02:34:30.080 - 11:30:06 AM; Dave McFerson from Hooksett opposes the bill, noting it would deter out-of-state participants in NH events like the White Mountains Triathlon, Wallis Sands Triathlon, and Cross New Hampshire Adventure Trail, impacting tourism and local spending. He shares a personal story about his friend Joe Dombrowski, who died biking near Lake Massabesic, and how the cycling community honors him with annual memorial rides using the Strava app for route sharing. McFerson warns the bill would reduce participation in such rides.
HB1703: Donald Moyer, Friends of the Northern Rail Trail Oppose02:36:39.760 - 11:32:15 AM; Donald Moyer, president of Friends of the Northern Rail Trail, opposes HB1703 on behalf of the 11-member board. He promotes cycling as affordable, healthy, and environmentally responsible, criticizing the bill as a poor tactical solution to funding. He references the unimplemented 2022 DOT Rail Trails Plan and notes the Bureau of Trails is self-funded without taxpayer money. For their 59-mile trail connecting 10 towns from Boscawen to Lebanon, they see 100,000-150,000 users yearly, funded 80% by federal RTP grants (gas tax money) averaging $80,000/year for resurfacing, plus private donations (40-50%). He supports class 1 and 2 e-bikes (up to 20 mph) for accessibility but notes issues with faster e-motorcycles, addressed in separate bills. Responds to questions on costs, e-bike federal definitions, and rail trail development processes.
HB1703: Paul Suska, BikeWalk Alliance of New Hampshire Oppose02:44:39.279 - 11:40:15 AM; Paul Suska, board president of BikeWalk Alliance of NH, opposes the bill, summarizing that bicycling benefits NH economically and health-wise (see attached data), but HB1703 would harm it. In light of the sponsor's intent to ITL, he offers the organization as a resource for alternatives. He reviews funding options from PeopleForBikes, noting user fees like Hawaii's registration or Oregon's $15 new bike tax ($880,000/year) are rare and inefficient due to collection/enforcement costs, regressivity, and behavioral impacts like reduced exercise. Advocates for expanded bike infrastructure and safer streets for all users.
HB1703: Joseph Saragi (Savage), Lebanon Oppose02:48:05.680 - 11:43:41 AM; Joseph Savage from Lebanon, a bike commuter and Northern Rail Trail user, opposes HB1703, quoting Susan B. Anthony on bicycles' emancipatory role. He views bikes as tools for freedom, empowerment, transportation, leisure, and health. Concerns include disproportionate enforcement on low-income and people of color, proof-of-ownership challenges (e.g., his Soviet-made bike), and unusual involvement of National Guard/Border Patrol as 'papers please' overreach. He praises cycling for extending lifespan by a year, commuting efficiency, climate benefits (e-bikes reduce carbon more than EVs), and efficiency as the most effective transport. Ties to NH's 'Live Free or Die' motto, urging the bill's defeat.
HB1703: Craig Renie, New Hampshire Bureau of Trails Information Only02:50:59.120 - 11:46:35 AM; Craig Renie, chief of the Bureau of Trails at DNCR, provides background on managing 320 miles of state-owned rail trails, plus snowmobile/ATV trails, self-funded entirely by motorized registrations (no general funds). 75% funds trail maintenance/grants for clubs; 25% to Fish and Game for enforcement/education. HB1703's fees would go to DOT, which lacks staffing/funding for bike routes. Current funding: motorized fees, federal grants, donations; no non-motorized fees. Users include pedestrians, skaters, equestrians, e-bikes, etc. Partners with nonprofits for grants/volunteers. New donation program via website/QR codes. Refers to 2022 Rail Trail Plan for funding ideas. Responds to questions on remediation (covering ballast with stone dust), subsurface rights (manage surface only), utilities in easements (dig safe required; utilities sometimes aid repairs), co-use with rails/snowmobiles, and development processes.
HB1703: Donald Ross, farmer, Concord, New Hampshire Support03:04:52.000 - 12:00:28 PM; Donald Ross, a farmer from Concord, NH, owning several hundred acres under conservation easement for passive recreation (walking, hiking, skiing, snowshoeing), supports HB1703 for bicycle registration to identify trespassing mountain bikers on his property, which is not permitted under his easement as mountain biking causes erosion and harm. He describes difficulties in monitoring trails on private land, lack of enforcement by state and local organizations, and confrontations with adult bikers who refuse to provide names. He notes videos and pictures of violators, including some in the room, and the burden on landowners like farmers. Ross suggests amendments: require registration only for those 16 and older (or 12), as issues are with adults, not youth; include all bikes (electric, pedal, unicycle). He shares personal story of entering the easement to preserve the farm, but it's been problematic without help. During Q&A, he explains the perpetual easement involving federal, state, and local entities, his ability to close trails if unmonitored, and signs already in place but unenforced.
HB1703: Jennifer Olri, Registration Bureau Administrator, NH DMV Information Only03:19:47.840 - 12:15:23 PM; Jennifer Olri from the NH DMV provides information on the fiscal note for HB1703, addressing staffing and systems changes required. In response to a question on the high cost and potential fixes to the $50 fee, she suggests further discussion on whether DMV is the appropriate agency to handle bicycle registration, noting the fiscal note would stand if DMV proceeds.
HB1176 0197h: Representative Gaison Support04:43:34.400 - 1:39:10 PM; Moves to pass HB1176 with fiscal note, then moves amendment 0197h, which restricts single rear plate display to non-commercial vehicles not towing; requires both plates for commercial vehicles, CDL vehicles, and those towing. Explains it ensures DMV continues issuing two plates for transfers. Defends the bill citing precedents like motorcycles and special plates working without issues for identification, tolls, and out-of-state vehicles.
HB1176 0197h: Representative Veu Support04:45:23.280 - 1:40:59 PM; Supports the amendment, calling it an improvement and one of the best versions of the legislation in six years.
HB1176 0197h: Representative Sinclair Oppose04:45:23.280 - 1:40:59 PM; Supports amendment but opposes the bill, emphasizing need for two plates per public safety experts for Amber Alerts, safety, and identification; questions CDL reference and clarifies commercial usage includes vehicles over 10,000 lbs or towing.
HB1176 0197h: Representative Fo Oppose04:48:04.638 - 1:43:40 PM; Supports amendment but votes against the bill due to caucus concerns on safety, Amber Alerts, and stolen vehicles identification.
HB1176 0197h: Representative (unnamed, owns 1989 Cadillac Allante) Support04:49:11.360 - 1:44:47 PM; Supports single rear plate, noting front plate ruins classic car aesthetics and law enforcement can easily identify unique vehicles like his.
HB1176 0197h: Representative Sykes Oppose04:50:03.040 - 1:45:39 PM; Supports amendment but firmly opposes single plates, citing public safety needs for two plates from professionals, beyond just tolls.
HB1176 0197h: Representative London Oppose04:51:23.120 - 1:46:59 PM; Supports amendment but opposes passage, highlighting safety benefits of two plates for BOLOs, alerts, stolen vehicles, tolls; notes opposition from police, all New England states require two (Vermont specials), Massachusetts reverted; no fiscal benefit as two plates still issued; mentions snow-covered rear plates visibility issue.
HB1176 0197h: Representative St. Clear Support04:53:43.680 - 1:49:19 PM; Supports bill, questioning police concerns given existing special plates (bicentennial, county fair) without front identification issues.
HB1176 0197h: Chairman (unnamed) Support04:54:50.480 - 1:50:26 PM; Agrees with Representative St. Clear on existing single plate precedents; notes front plates not lit at night per NHTSA; mentions upcoming 250th anniversary plate; suggests benefit of passing to avoid future similar bills.
HB1176 0197h: Representative Bond Information Only04:55:50.320 - 1:51:26 PM; Responds that Nashua bicentennial plate was a special limited-time dispensation, not standard rule.
HB1111 0342h: Representative Gaison Information Only05:02:56.000 - 1:58:32 PM; Moved ought to pass on HB1111. Then moved amendment 0342h, explaining it allows one support person with current documentation for persons with IEPs or learning disabilities, creates DMV code of conduct and liability waiver, prohibits influence on testing, removes suspension references, and introduces a 3-month administrative waiting period after three consecutive failures to allow retraining without increased fees.
HB1111 0342h: Representative Johnson Information Only05:04:56.400 - 2:00:32 PM; Asked clarifying questions about the amendment's retest procedure, confirming that after three consecutive failures, there's a 3-month wait before any further retesting, not resetting the count. Later asked if IEPs survive graduation, noting they may extend to age 21 in some cases.
HB1111 0342h: Representative Miller Oppose05:06:00.240 - 2:01:36 PM; Expressed concerns about the documentation for support personnel, questioning who provides and verifies it, whether it's from the IEP or a parent's note, and how it's regulated for relevance to driving tests.
HB1111 0342h: Unidentified Representative (experience with IEPs) Information Only05:07:20.638 - 2:02:56 PM; Explained that IEPs are detailed, specific to the child's needs, developed by a team, and can address testing anxiety or accommodations in classroom settings.
HB1111 0342h: Representative Fox Oppose05:09:18.160 - 2:04:54 PM; Noted that IEPs are specific but may not detail needs for a driving test accompaniment, and raised issues with IEPs for English as a second language potentially opening further complications.
HB1111 0342h: Representative Crawford Oppose05:10:15.840 - 2:05:51 PM; Pointed out that some students have 504 plans, which are also specific, and the amendment doesn't mention them, potentially creating additional issues.
HB1111 0342h: Representative Hill Oppose05:11:02.240 - 2:06:38 PM; Drew from experience on education committee, stating IEPs and 504s are individualized but applying education language to DMV could cause problems without DOE experts; unwilling to support the amendment due to complexity.
HB1111 0342h: Representative Val Oppose05:12:13.760 - 2:07:49 PM; Described administrative requirements as murky, questioned who decides IEP relevance for vehicle accompaniment, and worried about altering the testing environment for stressed applicants, risking road safety.
HB1111 0342h: Unidentified Representative Information Only05:13:11.680 - 2:08:47 PM; Sought clarification on the amendment's wording for failures 'three or more times,' noting potential ambiguity in counting after the waiting period.
HB1111 0342h: Representative Gaison (response) Information Only05:13:11.680 - 2:08:47 PM; Clarified that after three consecutive failures, the fourth attempt follows a 3-month wait, emphasizing protections for DMV and noting similarity to original bill's IEP language.
HB1111 0342h: Representative Petaro Oppose05:16:25.280 - 2:12:01 PM; Argued the bill misses the point of driving tests for safety, citing public hearing testimony and DMV concerns that they already adequately license capable drivers.
HB1111 0342h: Representative Be Oppose05:17:34.560 - 2:13:10 PM; Expressed empathy for the sponsor's experience and appreciation for efforts to improve the bill, but stated it falls short of safety standards.
HB1111 0342h: Representative Gaison Information Only05:18:40.560 - 2:14:16 PM; Acknowledged not being a subject matter expert, sought chair's advice on retaining the bill via interim study, ad hoc meeting, or ITL, noting time constraints before February 12th.
HB1111 0342h: Chairman Walsh Information Only05:19:39.280 - 2:15:15 PM; Outlined options like interim study (until next fall, requiring return vote) or ad hoc/ITL, but noted both delay action to next year and create extra work; recommended against interim study.
HB1111 0342h: Representative Phil Information Only05:20:38.480 - 2:16:14 PM; Pointed out that interim study or ad hoc options would mean the bill comes up next year, nothing this year.
HB1111 0342h: Representative Gaison (motion) Vote05:21:40.320 - 2:17:16 PM; Moved inexpedient to legislate on HB1111 FN after ought to pass failed.
HB1421 0309h: Representative Coker Information Only05:30:52.400 - 2:26:28 PM; Moved to pass HB1421 with amendment 0309h. Explained that the subcommittee changed the titling exemption from a rolling 15-year to a 20-year period to reduce financial impact while meeting the bill's intent. The amendment allows elective titling for vehicles in the 20-year window if not mandated and not yet antique, providing security for ownership, chain of custody, or out-of-state sales, with required documentation to DMV.
HB1421 0309h: Representative Hill Information Only05:31:51.600 - 2:27:27 PM; Questioned the phrasing 'the current year' in the amendment, noting it's bolded and italicized, suggesting it might not align with existing RSA language. Asked if there's a better way to express a rolling exemption and inquired about DMV's typical language for such provisions.
HB1421 0309h: Jennifer Olirri, DMV Registration Bureau Administrator Information Only05:34:04.400 - 2:29:40 PM; Suggested mimicking RSA 259:4 language for antique vehicles, which uses 'over 25 years old' or 'over 20 years old' for fire apparatus, to replace 'current year'. Offered alternatives like 'model year 20 years old or older'. Expressed preference for 'over' but noted the proposed language might not cause confusion. Later clarified that under current law, vehicles 2000 or newer require titles, antiques (2000 or older) may apply optionally, and there was previously a gap where titling wasn't allowed.
HB1421 0309h: Representative Miller Information Only05:35:09.680 - 2:30:45 PM; Raised concern about potential confusion with '20 years before the current year', using a 2006 vehicle example in 2026 qualifying but not in prior months, highlighting timing issues with model years.
HB1421 0309h: Representative Gen (unidentified) Information Only05:36:18.878 - 2:31:54 PM; Suggested taking a break to research prior terminology from 2013 law on 15-year exemptions.
HB1421 0309h: Unidentified Representative Information Only05:37:13.680 - 2:32:49 PM; Asked if current law allows voluntary titling for untitled old cars, confirming with DMV that antiques may apply if documentation is provided, addressing past gaps.
HB1421 0309h: Jennifer Olirri, DMV Information Only05:52:00.878 - 2:47:36 PM; After break, referenced 2013 RSA 261:3 using 'manufacturer's model year is older than 15 years', counted as calendar years from January 1, entering the 16th year for exemption. Confirmed use of 'model year' and that 'or older' would align with antique statutes for consistency, noting prior consistent interpretation without 'or older'.
HB1421 0309h: Representative Hill Information Only05:53:18.480 - 2:48:54 PM; Confirmed assumption that it refers to manufacturer's model year and supported using 'or older' for consistency with title 21 statutes.
HB1421 0309h: Representative Hamlin Oppose05:54:32.000 - 2:50:08 PM; Expressed confusion with the language similar to Representative Hill, concerned about multiple interpretations by town clerks dealing with customers, emphasizing need for clarity.
HB1421 0309h: Representative Miller Oppose05:55:34.000 - 2:51:10 PM; Noted literal reading of 'is 20 years before the current year' exempts only exactly 20-year-old vehicles, not older, potentially problematic legally despite intent, recommending addition of 'or older'.
HB1421 0309h: Representative Gen Support05:55:34.000 - 2:51:10 PM; Defended the amendment as clear enough and urged sending it to avoid further delays and risks of missing details in revisions.
HB1421 0309h: Chairman Walsh Information Only05:56:26.320 - 2:52:02 PM; Preferred clean work, proposed voting down amendment 0309h, recessing session until next Tuesday for a corrected version with consistent language, noting time availability before deadline.
HB1430: Representative Miller Oppose05:59:45.520 - 2:55:21 PM; Moved inexpedient to legislate (ITL) on HB1430 FN, explaining it's superfluous after productive subcommittee on related titling bills like HB1421 and HB1466, making this unnecessary.
HB1430: Vice Chairman Gorski Vote06:00:40.558 - 2:56:16 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1430: Representative Hill Vote06:00:40.558 - 2:56:16 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1430: Representative Foot Vote06:00:40.558 - 2:56:16 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1430: Representative (unidentified) Vote06:00:40.558 - 2:56:16 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1430: Representative Coker Vote06:00:40.558 - 2:56:16 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1430: Representative Gison Vote06:00:40.558 - 2:56:16 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1430: Representative Hamlin Vote06:00:40.558 - 2:56:16 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1430: Representative Vu Vote06:00:40.558 - 2:56:16 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1430: Representative Miller Vote06:00:40.558 - 2:56:16 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1430: Representative Sykes Vote06:00:40.558 - 2:56:16 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1430: Representative Sinclair Vote06:00:40.558 - 2:56:16 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1430: Representative Fox Vote06:00:40.558 - 2:56:16 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1430: Representative Johnson Vote06:00:40.558 - 2:56:16 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1430: Representative Pondan Vote06:00:40.558 - 2:56:16 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1430: Chairman Walsh Vote06:00:40.558 - 2:56:16 PM; Voted yes on ITL. Motion for consent adopted unanimously, 16-0.
HB1445: Representative Johnson Oppose06:02:46.080 - 2:58:22 PM; Moved ITL on HB1445 FN, acknowledging issues from public hearing on cost, demand, and technology logistics. Noted current statute allows DMV to issue enhanced licenses and suggested informal DMV work for next session.
HB1445: Vice Chairman Gsky Vote06:04:42.000 - 3:00:18 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1445: Clerk Vote06:04:42.000 - 3:00:18 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1445: Representative Hill Vote06:04:42.000 - 3:00:18 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1445: Representative Foot Vote06:04:42.000 - 3:00:18 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1445: Representative (unidentified) Vote06:04:42.000 - 3:00:18 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1445: Representative Coker Vote06:04:42.000 - 3:00:18 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1445: Representative Gasen Vote06:04:42.000 - 3:00:18 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1445: Representative Hamlin Vote06:04:42.000 - 3:00:18 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1445: Representative Veo Vote06:04:42.000 - 3:00:18 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1445: Representative Miller Vote06:04:42.000 - 3:00:18 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1445: Representative Sykes Vote06:04:42.000 - 3:00:18 PM; Voted reluctantly yes on ITL.
HB1445: Representative Sinclair Vote06:04:42.000 - 3:00:18 PM; Voted reluctantly yes on ITL.
HB1445: Representative Fox Vote06:04:42.000 - 3:00:18 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1445: Representative Johnson Vote06:04:42.000 - 3:00:18 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1445: Representative Flamandon Vote06:04:42.000 - 3:00:18 PM; Voted yes on ITL.
HB1445: Chairman Walsh Vote06:04:42.000 - 3:00:18 PM; Voted reluctantly yes on ITL, noting agreement on concept but fiscal note issues likely prevent passage in second committee. Consent adopted, 16-0.
HB1078: Representative Gison Support06:08:51.600 - 3:04:27 PM; Moved ought to pass on HB1078 FN. Explained it extends respect to Gold Star fathers and immediate family members with three plate options: mother, father, family. Emphasized solidarity and mourning with families for their sacrifice.
HB1078: Representative Hamlin (second) Support06:08:51.600 - 3:04:27 PM; Seconded the motion.
HB1078: Unidentified Representative Support06:09:47.040 - 3:05:23 PM; Learned Gold Star dads lacked plates, called it egregious, fully supported the bill.
HB1078: Representative B. Support06:09:47.040 - 3:05:23 PM; Wished more could be done but supported the bill 100% as a great cause.
HB1078: Representative Foot Support06:09:47.040 - 3:05:23 PM; Called it a no-brainer, the least that can be done for families' big sacrifice, supported 100%.
HB1078: Chairman Walsh Vote06:10:40.878 - 3:06:16 PM; Noted potential effective date change in finance committee. All voted yes unanimously, 16-0. Discussed consent vs. regular calendar to allow floor recognition; decided on regular calendar for potential speeches honoring families. Representative (unidentified) explained vote against consent to emphasize importance, shared personal family history of Gold Star losses to advocate recognition.
HB1078: Vice Chair Gorski Vote06:10:40.878 - 3:06:16 PM; Voted yes on ought to pass.
HB1078: Representative Hill Vote06:10:40.878 - 3:06:16 PM; Voted yes on ought to pass.
HB1078: Representative Foot Vote06:10:40.878 - 3:06:16 PM; Voted yes on ought to pass.
HB1078: Representative Petero Vote06:10:40.878 - 3:06:16 PM; Voted yes on ought to pass.
HB1078: Representative Coker Vote06:10:40.878 - 3:06:16 PM; Voted yes on ought to pass.
HB1078: Representative Gasen Vote06:10:40.878 - 3:06:16 PM; Voted yes on ought to pass.
HB1078: Representative Hamlin Vote06:10:40.878 - 3:06:16 PM; Voted yes on ought to pass.
HB1078: Representative Au Vote06:10:40.878 - 3:06:16 PM; Voted yes on ought to pass.
HB1078: Representative Miller Vote06:10:40.878 - 3:06:16 PM; Voted yes on ought to pass.
HB1078: Representative Sykes Vote06:10:40.878 - 3:06:16 PM; Voted yes on ought to pass.
HB1078: Representative Sinclair Vote06:10:40.878 - 3:06:16 PM; Voted yes on ought to pass.
HB1078: Representative Fox Vote06:10:40.878 - 3:06:16 PM; Voted yes on ought to pass.
HB1078: Representative Johnson Vote06:10:40.878 - 3:06:16 PM; Voted yes on ought to pass.
HB1078: Representative Pomandon Vote06:10:40.878 - 3:06:16 PM; Voted yes on ought to pass.
HB1078: Chairman Walsh Vote06:10:40.878 - 3:06:16 PM; Voted yes on ought to pass.

Walsh, Thomas(Chairman)(R)[B-]2025	Crawford, Karel(Clerk)(R)[C+]2025	Gorski, Ted(V Chairman)(R)[B+]2025
Sykes, George(D)[F]2025	Hill, Gregory(R)[A-]2025	Plamondon, Marc(D)[F]2025
Veilleux, Daniel(D)[F]2025	Pitaro, Matthew(R)[A-]2025	Coker, Matthew(R)[C]2025
St. Clair, Charlie(D)[D-]2025	Fox, Dru(D)[F]2025	Foote, Charles(R)[B]2025
Johnson, Erik(D)[F]2025	Miller, Seth(D)[F]2025	Hamblen, Joseph(R)[B]2025
Giasson, Henry(R)[A+]2025