Committee Summary for House State-Federal Relations and Veterans Affairs (02/06/2026)

Bill/Time	Type	Title	Sponsor
Unclear 00:01:36.240 - 8:00:17 AM	General Working Session	Unclear
HB1287 0198H 00:04:47.360 - 8:03:28 AM	Public Hearing	adopting the federal definition of "veteran."	Corcoran, Travis(R)[A-]2025
Unclear 00:06:50.319 - 8:05:31 AM	General Working Session	Unclear
HCR13 00:15:09.360 - 8:13:50 AM	Public Hearing	requesting Congress to call a constitutional convention relative to implementing term limits for elected members of both houses of Congress.	Alexander, Joe(R)[A+]2025
HCR13 00:16:29.360 - 8:15:10 AM	Public Hearing	requesting Congress to call a constitutional convention relative to implementing term limits for elected members of both houses of Congress.	Alexander, Joe(R)[A+]2025
HR34 01:31:40.000 - 9:30:21 AM	Public Hearing	declaring that Sharia law and political Islam represent an existential threat to the state and country and that any deference to Sharia law by a government institution is prohibited.	Sabourin dit Choinière, Matt(R)[A-]2025
HCR16 02:52:38.640 - 10:51:19 AM	Public Hearing	applying for a convention of the states under Article V of the Constitution of the United States.	Gilmore, Gary(D)[F]2025
HB1287 0198H 04:06:35.279 - 12:05:16 PM	Executive Session	adopting the federal definition of "veteran."	Corcoran, Travis(R)[A-]2025
HCR16 04:14:55.359 - 12:13:36 PM	Executive Session	applying for a convention of the states under Article V of the Constitution of the United States.	Gilmore, Gary(D)[F]2025
HR20 04:19:17.600 - 12:17:58 PM	Executive Session	reaffirming the right for persons of all persuasions to keep and bear arms, and urging Congress and the President to cease infringement upon Second Amendment rights and to restore them where infringed.	McFarlane, Donald(R)[A]2025
HR21 0088H 04:22:30.159 - 12:21:11 PM	Executive Session	urging New Hampshire's congressional delegation to support the repeal of the 2001 and 2002 Authorizations for Use of Military Force.	Mannion, Tom(R)[A+]2025
HR23 04:28:47.520 - 12:27:28 PM	Executive Session	affirming the importance of digital literacy and access for older Americans.	Miller, Seth(D)[F]2025
HR26 0417H 04:43:59.120 - 12:42:40 PM	Executive Session	supporting peace and stability in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.	Georges, Mary(D)[D-]2025
HCR12 04:50:06.480 - 12:48:47 PM	Executive Session	calling upon the federal delegation from New Hampshire to support Medicare for All, a universal health insurance program that guarantees all people the health care they need.	LaMontagne, Jessica(D)[F]2025
HCR13 05:08:27.360 - 1:07:08 PM	Executive Session	requesting Congress to call a constitutional convention relative to implementing term limits for elected members of both houses of Congress.	Alexander, Joe(R)[A+]2025
HR32 2026-0419h 05:28:11.920 - 1:26:52 PM	Executive Session	urging the United States Congress to rescind President Donald Trump's tariffs.	Simpson, Alexis(D)[CT]2025

Unclear: Unidentified Committee Member Information Only00:01:36.240 - 8:00:17 AM; The speaker announces that the meeting will start in another minute and requests Representative Bennett to lead the pledge of allegiance once the meeting begins, asking him to get warmed up for it.
HB1287 0198H: Representative Manion Information Only00:04:47.360 - 8:03:28 AM; Representative Manion explained the purpose of the amendment to HB1287, which aligns the state's definition of a veteran with the federal standard by including those with a general discharge under honorable conditions. The amendment removes provisions that stripped proof requirements like the DD214 form, restoring the original RSA language. It also eliminates a questionable clause about issuing documents to World War II allied veterans, noting the improbability due to age and historical allies like the Soviet Union and China.
Unclear: Representative Foss Information Only00:06:50.319 - 8:05:31 AM; Representative Foss clarified for the record that she was not born during Ronald Reagan's presidency, explaining why she couldn't answer the trivia question about his birthday.
Unclear: Representative Bennett Information Only00:07:59.280 - 8:06:40 AM; Representative Bennett shared her background: she studied to be a math teacher but stayed home to homeschool her 13 children after her oldest disliked math. As her children grew, she became involved in community service, serving on the school board, currently as a library trustee, and on the ethics committee. She was approached to run for state representative and now teaches math at a Christian school, which accommodates her legislative duties.
Unclear: Representative Rollins Information Only00:09:06.720 - 8:07:47 AM; Representative Rollins shared a personal story about his son, killed in action in Samar, Iraq on March 5, 2007. The night before, his son discovered and helped deliver eight puppies from a dog he adopted at an Iraqi police station. After his son's death, the family requested one of the puppies as a memento, overcoming military restrictions through media attention. They kept the dog for 13.5 years as a tie to their son. Rollins used media appearances to advocate for soldiers bringing adopted dogs home, which led to policy changes allowing it and reducing the need for medication among returning veterans. This experience fuels his passion for veterans' affairs, leading him to serve on this committee. He also noted his son's Facebook post expressing a desire for Iraqi children to have freedoms like American children.
HCR13: Committee Chair Information Only00:15:09.360 - 8:13:50 AM; The chair welcomes Speaker Packard to the hearing and notes the presence of Honorable Linda Masamela, a former senator from Littleton, acknowledging the drive from the north country and engaging in light banter about whether Littleton is truly part of the North Country, referencing debate from Coosburg. The chair invites Masamela to testify if desired by using a pink card. At 9:15, the chair calls to order the hearing on HCR13, distinguishing it from HRs.
HCR13: Representative Joe Alexander, Gothtown Support00:16:29.360 - 8:15:10 AM; Representative Alexander introduces HCR13, explaining it calls for an Article 5 convention to propose term limits for Congress. He notes 12 states have passed similar resolutions, with 34 needed to trigger the convention. He highlights 84% support in New Hampshire across party lines and demographics, emphasizing the importance of representing the people.
HCR13: Representative Manion Information Only00:18:25.280 - 8:17:06 AM; Representative Manion asks about the historical Article 5 process and whether federal action might preempt state efforts on term limits.
HCR13: Representative Joe Alexander Support00:18:25.280 - 8:17:06 AM; Alexander responds that state momentum pressures Congress to act, noting Congress's reluctance to be regulated externally.
HCR13: Representative Cyber Information Only00:18:25.280 - 8:17:06 AM; Representative Cyber asks if Alexander would support term limits for state representatives.
HCR13: Representative Joe Alexander Support00:19:40.400 - 8:18:21 AM; Alexander explains his eighth year in the House, distinguishing the citizen legislature from Congress's career nature with pensions and high pay, deeming term limits more suitable for Congress.
HCR13: Representative Jones Information Only00:19:40.400 - 8:18:21 AM; Representative Jones inquires about last year's HCR3 on a constitutional convention and its fate.
HCR13: Representative Joe Alexander Support00:20:35.840 - 8:19:16 AM; Alexander clarifies HCR13 is for a single-purpose Article 5 convention on term limits, unlike the broader HCR3.
HCR13: Committee Chair Information Only00:20:35.840 - 8:19:16 AM; The Chair distinguishes HCR13's specificity to term limits from the broader Article 5 convention in HCR3.
HCR13: Representative Budataki Information Only00:21:33.840 - 8:20:14 AM; Representative Budataki asks if the resolution should include term limits for Supreme Court justices.
HCR13: Representative Joe Alexander Support00:21:33.840 - 8:20:14 AM; Alexander notes the Constitution allows lifetime Supreme Court service, unlike Congress, and there are checks like impeachment.
HCR13: Representative Budataki Information Only00:21:33.840 - 8:20:14 AM; Budataki follows up on whether term limits should apply to Supreme Court justices.
HCR13: Representative Joe Alexander Support00:21:33.840 - 8:20:14 AM; Alexander reiterates opposition due to existing checks and balances.
HCR13: Representative Bennett Information Only00:21:33.840 - 8:20:14 AM; Representative Bennett asks how many states have passed the resolution and the process involved.
HCR13: Representative Joe Alexander Support00:22:42.000 - 8:21:23 AM; Alexander confirms 12 states have passed it, needing 34 to force action, with Congress likely responding around 30-31.
HCR13: Honorable Linda Masamela, Littleton Support00:23:45.600 - 8:22:26 AM; Masamela provides historical context on the Constitution's creation, ratification, and Article 5's role as a self-correcting mechanism against corruption. She explains the 'prodding effect' where Article 5 threats prompted Congress to propose 15 of 27 amendments, citing examples like the 17th, 21st, 22nd, 25th, and 27th Amendments, and the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act from a balanced budget push.
HCR13: Unknown Speaker Support00:27:40.640 - 8:26:21 AM; The speaker urges New Hampshire to apply for an Article V convention due to Congress's failure to govern and listen to the people. They dismiss fears of a runaway convention, arguing that in times of government irresponsibility, it's time to let the people's voices be heard and impose term limits on Congress. The speaker emphasizes the need for preconvention solutions like rules for the convention and delegate selection, viewing the Article V process as a bold, innovative approach akin to the founding fathers' actions. They highlight two potential outcomes: either a convention occurs or it prompts Congress to act, and warn that fear of the government leads to tyranny.
HCR13: Former Ranking Member Mess Information Only00:30:29.360 - 8:29:10 AM; The speaker concludes their testimony with a quote: 'If the government fears the people it produces freedom and action.' No further substantive testimony is provided in this snippet.
HCR13: Deborah Childs, Dover, NH, representing U.S. Term Limits Support00:31:30.720 - 8:30:11 AM; Deborah Childs introduced herself as a lifelong New Hampshire resident from Dover in Strafford County and the new legislative director for U.S. Term Limits, noting she just registered as a lobbyist. She expressed strong support for HCR13, highlighting that 84% of New Hampshire voters favor term limits for Congress due to low confidence and trust in federal lawmakers. She argued that term limits would create open seats, allowing new candidates to compete without being discouraged by long-term incumbents. Childs emphasized the need for more young people, women (noting only 28% of federal elected officials are female), people of color, and diversity in office. She cited data showing that open seats attract more diverse candidates, enabling a broader pool of leaders that reflects America's diversity and rebuilds trust in Congress.
HCR13: Aaron Ducet, Berlin, NH, representing U.S. Term Limits Support00:34:28.560 - 8:33:09 AM; Aaron Ducet explains HCR13 as a single-topic Article 5 application for a constitutional convention to propose congressional term limits. He emphasizes the process where states apply pressure on Congress to act, citing historical examples like the 17th and 22nd Amendments. He highlights the bipartisan support, with 84% of New Hampshire residents favoring term limits across demographics. Ducet discusses human nature in power, the evolution of Congress from citizen legislators to career politicians, and the unfair incumbency advantage in DC compared to state legislatures like New Hampshire's. He argues term limits provide a nonpartisan solution, ensuring open seats, more competition, and benefits to voters similar to market competition. He references polling data, op-eds by bipartisan figures, and a letter from David Tone supporting term limits for a vibrant democracy. During Q&A, he addresses presidential term limits history, special interests' opposition, the need for fair elections beyond term limits, voter responsibility versus structural barriers, consecutive vs. non-consecutive limits, incumbency power through media and fundraising, and how term limits increase voter turnout and policy effectiveness.
HCR13: Nick Tumblites, representing U.S. Term Limits Support01:05:27.760 - 9:04:08 AM; Nick Tumblites contrasts New Hampshire's citizen legislature, designed with small districts and volunteer service, to Congress's entrenched professional class. He argues term limits would approximate a citizen legislature by guaranteeing competitive open seats, making elections more accessible without millions in PAC money, bringing fresh ideas, and preventing bad actors from staying indefinitely. He addresses convention concerns by citing the 'prodding effect' in history, including the Bill of Rights, 17th Amendment, and presidential term limits, where state threats prompted Congress to act. In Q&A, he suggests shorter limits for the House (more democratic) and longer for the Senate, emphasizing any limit is better than 40-50 years in one seat.
HCR13: Deb Crusell, Pelham, NH, representing herself Oppose01:11:22.080 - 9:10:03 AM; Deb Crusell opposes HCR13 and a constitutional convention, arguing the core issues are untrustworthy elections and non-compliance with the existing Constitution, not term length. She advocates for hand-counted ballots, eliminating foreign election machines, and limiting mail-in voting to secure elections. She claims 84% support for term limits may stem from unaware voters believing in election fraud. She favors repealing the 17th Amendment to restore state legislatures' appointment of senators for better state representation and checks. Crusell warns that a convention risks unrestrained government ignoring new amendments, as it already violates the current Constitution through bureaucracies and overreach. She urges retaining constitutional mentors in Washington and fixing the system before changes. In Q&A, she expresses no specific solutions but trusts the founders' design, opposes conventions while open to repealing amendments like the 17th and income tax, and insists on securing elections first before partial fixes like term limits.
HCR13: Speaker Packard, Londonderry, NH Support01:20:02.239 - 9:18:43 AM; Speaker Packard, initially against term limits, now supports HCR13 after observing Washington dysfunction. He views it as a step to return power to states via federalism efforts with the National Conference of State Legislatures, citing meetings to restore 10th Amendment powers eroded by Congress's overreach and blackmail through funding. He sees term limits as twofold: limiting Congress while empowering states. In Q&A, he agrees long-serving members become donor-beholden, notes New Hampshire's low corruption risk due to minimal pay, and attributes his change of mind to cumulative Washington issues worsening over years.
HCR13: Unknown Information Only01:27:18.000 - 9:25:59 AM; The speaker announces that the next person will be on deck to speak.
HR34: Chair (unnamed) Information Only01:31:40.000 - 9:30:21 AM; The chair introduces the hearing on HR34, notes the prime sponsor Representative Dwiner (transcribed as Sabarend Schwaneer), and explains that due to the volume of testimony cards, speakers will be limited to two minutes to ensure everyone is heard. The chair also mentions options for written testimony and the ability to review video.
HR34: Representative Dwiner (prime sponsor) Support01:33:02.239 - 9:31:43 AM; Representative Dwiner introduces HR34 as a resolution condemning Sharia law and political Islam. He cites Texas legislation prohibiting Sharia law communities, federal efforts like the No Sharia Act, and the European Court of Human Rights stating Sharia is incompatible with democracy. He provides examples of Sharia enforcement in Minnesota, New York, and California through voluntary but non-withdrawable arbitrations, often without constitutional oversight. He urges support for an OTP motion to assert New Hampshire's common law tradition.
HR34: Representative Foss (questioning) Information Only01:34:52.719 - 9:33:33 AM; Representative Foss questions Representative Dwiner on whether mandatory arbitration in general is an example of Sharia, seeking clarification on contexts where it is enforced.
HR34: Representative Belchure (questioning) Information Only01:35:53.360 - 9:34:34 AM; Representative Belchure asks about voluntary tribunals using Sharia as binding guidelines and whether withdrawing from such arbitration is considered leaving the faith under Sharia principles, with penalties up to death. He notes the committee's recent vote against the death penalty.
HR34: Unnamed Representative (questioning) Information Only01:37:04.080 - 9:35:45 AM; An unnamed representative asks if Sharia law is already prohibited by the U.S. Constitution's establishment clause and why the measure is necessary if so. Representative Dwiner responds by supporting federal efforts and asserting New Hampshire's constitution.
HR34: Representative Buddhakei (questioning) Information Only01:38:26.239 - 9:37:07 AM; Representative Buddhakei questions the resolution's declaration of Islam as an existential threat, asking what prevents future resolutions targeting other faiths like Hinduism.
HR34: Representative Hagen from Pembroke Support01:41:43.840 - 9:40:24 AM; Representative Hagen supports HR34, emphasizing it concerns the establishment clause and deference to Sharia law by government, not the practice of Islam. He shares a personal experience of being jailed in Morocco for smuggling Gospel studies, highlighting enforcement of Sharia in Islamic states. He clarifies the resolution addresses accusations of Islamophobia as tools to shut down discussion and asserts it protects the U.S. Constitution without harming people of faith. He agrees the resolution could broadly state no religious law supersedes U.S. law.
HR34: Representative Foss (questioning Hagen) Information Only01:43:53.040 - 9:42:34 AM; Representative Foss points out language in the resolution linking Islamophobia to the Muslim Brotherhood and Marxist narratives, questioning if it contradicts claims that the bill is not about Islam.
HR34: Representative Khan from Seabrook Support01:45:55.520 - 9:44:36 AM; Representative Khan, born Muslim and practicing rituals, supports the resolution. He references a previous successful resolution that passed overwhelmingly. He states he is not an expert on Sharia but opposes certain parts of it while maintaining his faith.
HR34: Representative Khan from Seabrook Support01:47:12.800 - 9:45:53 AM; Representative Khan expresses concerns about extreme interpretations of Sharia law that undermine women's rights, such as prohibiting women from running for public office or participating in society. She highlights how different groups and countries misuse Sharia for their own purposes, giving the religion a bad name. She emphasizes the need to prevent such extremes in society and agrees with broadening the resolution to any religious-based law that threatens the state. She supports the resolution to raise awareness about protecting women's rights and preventing a divided society.
HR34: Lynn Lipett from Milford Oppose01:50:51.760 - 9:49:32 AM; Lynn Lipett, a concerned citizen with Muslim family and friends, opposes the bill, stating there is nothing to fear from Muslims. She argues the bill is unnecessary and unconstitutional, as it targets practices already illegal under US law, such as severe punishments. She compares it to extreme interpretations in Christianity like 'an eye for an eye,' questioning why only Sharia is targeted. She criticizes the undefined term 'political Islam' and its potential impact on Muslims' freedom of speech and political participation, drawing parallels to fears about John F. Kennedy's Catholicism. She believes the bill infringes on Muslims' constitutional rights to practice religion and speak freely, as it would unfairly scrutinize their motivations.
HR34: Mammad from Manchester Oppose01:53:56.719 - 9:52:37 AM; Mammad argues that HR34 violates the First Amendment by singling out Sharia law as a threat, which is unconstitutional. Sharia guides personal conscience for Muslims similarly to other religious codes and does not override U.S. law due to the Supremacy Clause. The resolution creates a constitutional problem without addressing any real issue and sets a precedent for condemning religious beliefs, urging rejection to protect religious freedom.
HR34: Mike Moore from Enfield Support01:56:06.880 - 9:54:47 AM; Mike Moore shares experiences from traveling to Islamic countries like Egypt, UAE, and Saudi Arabia, where he witnessed Sharia law in practice. He expresses concern over mass migration of Muslims to Europe leading to cultural changes and violence, seeing similar trends in the US. Sharia law mandates submission in all aspects of life with no separation of mosque and state, which is unacceptable in America. He dismisses the peaceful vs. terrorist Muslim distinction as false, noting peaceful Muslims pursue Sharia through other means in places like Texas and Minnesota. He urges passing HR34 to defend the constitutional republic, rejecting Islamophobia accusations.
HR34: Lisa Bowden representing New Hampshire Council of Churches from Concord Information Only01:59:30.880 - 9:58:11 AM; Lisa Bowden is introduced as representing the New Hampshire Council of Churches with written testimony, but her verbal testimony is not provided in the transcript.
HR34: Lisa Bodwin, Executive Director, New Hampshire Council of Churches, Concord Oppose02:00:10.239 - 9:58:51 AM; Lisa Bodwin opposes HR34, stating it undermines New Hampshire's commitment to religious liberty and constitutional governance. She notes no evidence of judges or agencies violating constitutional duties. She references the American Bar Association's criticism of anti-Sharia bills as discriminatory pretexts. The bill makes unsubstantiated allegations against Islam and Muslim communities, weakening legislative credibility. It sets a dangerous precedent for targeting other faiths. She urges voting it inexpedient to legislate, emphasizing religious freedom and love across differences. She cites the Good Samaritan parable from the Gospel of Luke to advocate recognizing dignity in foreign religious communities. During questioning, she addresses concerns about a referenced document, promising to verify, and stresses focusing on New Hampshire's religious tolerance rather than foreign theocracies. She warns against Christian nationalist ideologies that could lead to intolerance.
HR34: Patrick Binder, Manchester, representing himself Support02:07:51.840 - 10:06:32 AM; Patrick Binder supports the resolution, quoting Founding Fathers like Hamilton on being wary of disharmonious cultures. He emphasizes America's unique legal system and views Sharia as a foreign system opposing assimilation. He questions the motives of foreign influences seeking resources, influence, and power, seeing it as an existential threat to the American way of life. Referencing General Stark, he opposes foreign influence as tyranny. He argues the resolution sends a message to Islamists that Sharia will not be imposed in New Hampshire, protecting the state's way of life.
HR34: Beverly Woods, Wolfeboro, representing herself Oppose02:09:52.000 - 10:08:33 AM; Beverly Woods opposes the resolution, sharing her 50-year residency in New Hampshire and descent from pre-Revolutionary War ancestors who fought for the nation's ideals. As a person of faith rooted in Quaker and Unitarian Universalist traditions, she believes this resolution contradicts the truth-witnessing values of these faiths. She plans to submit written testimony later.
HR34: Unnamed Speaker Oppose02:11:26.079 - 10:10:07 AM; The speaker criticizes the resolution for containing falsehoods and not belonging in the legislature. They describe it as an attack on Islam that fosters suspicion toward Muslims, suggesting it implies Muslims are trying to take over the state. The speaker compares the threat of Sharia law to an irrelevant biblical prohibition, emphasizing it poses no real danger and serves only to incite worry about Muslims. They speak on behalf of their Muslim community members, friends, and family, expressing strong opposition.
HR34: Muay from Manchester Oppose02:12:55.280 - 10:11:36 AM; Muay, a resident of Manchester, testified in opposition to the bill. He stated that the resolution is unconstitutional and that the state does not have the right to legislate which law.
HR34: Muay, Manchester Information Only02:12:55.280 - 10:11:36 AM; The speaker explains that Sharia is a guide or code for Muslims covering personal life, morality, business, marriage, and divorce. They argue that the resolution attempts to legislate theology by defining Sharia. They emphasize that Islam requires Muslims to follow the law of the land, which is part of Sharia itself, and thus Sharia is not a threat.
HR34: Unknown Oppose02:14:03.920 - 10:12:44 AM; The speaker questions whether God is legal or illegal and criticizes the resolution for trying to define Sharia, which they describe as a guide for Muslims' personal life, morality, business, marriage, and divorce. They argue that such an attempt legislates theology and assert that Sharia is not a threat because Islam mandates Muslims to follow the law of the land.
HR34: Unknown Oppose02:14:50.159 - 10:13:31 AM; The speaker argues against HR34, stating that Sharia law requires following the law of the land. They point out that the resolution contains misinformation, such as claims about honor killings and hand cutting, which lack Islamic basis and sources, and are intended to fearmonger. They explain that Muslim families' use of Sharia in wills or contracts is an exercise of constitutional rights and subordinate to US laws via the supremacy clause. Passing the resolution would violate religious freedom by declaring divine law of one religion illegal, and they urge voting against it.
HR34: David Williams, Manchester, New Hampshire Support02:17:02.559 - 10:15:43 AM; David Williams from Manchester, New Hampshire, supports HR34, which addresses preventing Sharia law from influencing U.S. government and laws. He shares his experience living and working in Middle Eastern Muslim countries for over 16 years, noting that his Muslim friends and family would not want Sharia law to affect U.S. governance. He argues that English common law and Sharia law, derived from the Quran and Hadiths, are fundamentally incompatible systems. He compares this to expecting English common law to apply in Turkey, emphasizing that immigrants must abide by the host country's laws upon becoming U.S. citizens. Quoting Elliot Carrington, he highlights the competing visions of religious, political, and social order rooted in differing worldviews. He provides a humorous anecdote from his time in Saudi Arabia about a Saudi friend's perspective on traffic accidents, illustrating cultural and legal differences. In conclusion, he fully supports the bill if needed to prevent Sharia influence, believing even his Muslim acquaintances would agree.
HR34: Mohammad Sal, Keene, New Hampshire Oppose02:20:35.359 - 10:19:16 AM; Mohammad Sal, a Muslim American from Bangladesh who has been a U.S. citizen for 30 years, opposes HR34. He emphasizes that he loves America for its lack of religious preference, contrasting it with his home country. He argues that issues with women's rights in some Muslim societies are cultural, not religious, and points to Bangladesh's history of female leadership. He shares that his sisters are successful professionals, countering the resolution's allegations as fabricated. Singling out Muslims undermines safety, trust, and equality, weakening New Hampshire. He explains Sharia as personal principles like prayer and charity, which respect the law of the land, and criticizes HR34 for creating a double standard. Muslims are law-abiding contributors deserving equal protection, and he urges rejection of the bill.
HR34: Francisco Puchella, Keene, New Hampshire Oppose02:26:57.520 - 10:25:38 AM; Francisco Puchella, a New Hampshire native born in Nashua in 1991, who lived in New York City for 15 years and now resides in Keene, opposes the resolution. He shares positive experiences living in predominantly Muslim neighborhoods in New York, particularly among West African communities from Senegal, Mali, and Burkina Faso, describing them as peaceful and communal, similar to New Hampshire's values. He highlights feeling accepted despite being a white man in those areas. In light of Black History Month, he warns against legislation that dehumanizes groups, drawing parallels to historical racial injustices that started small but escalated. He argues that opposing new cultures is anti-American and contrary to the bravery of veterans who faced unfamiliar environments. Religion guides morality, not legal conduct, and distortions exist in all faiths, including Christianity. He references ongoing issues like KKK recruitment in the U.S. to counter concerns about extremism elsewhere, advocating for America to set a positive example.
HR34: Annette Tuttle, Manchester Support02:36:50.720 - 10:35:31 AM; Annette Tuttle from Manchester expressed strong support for the resolution opposing Sharia law. She has studied Islam and Sharia law for over a year and rebuked the idea that the KKK represents Christianity. She argued that Sharia law violates the First Amendment by establishing religion and prohibiting free exercise. She clarified she is not anti-Muslim, having hosted a Muslim woman, but is concerned about her rights as a Christian woman and those of Jewish people. She described Islam as anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, and anti-constitution, with the goal of all worshipping Allah, citing examples from Iran to illustrate the oppression of women. She emphasized the need to protect religious freedoms and urged the committee to pass the resolution to ban Sharia law in the state, stating that if it's not a problem, banning it has no consequence.
HR34: Hamdan, Manchester Oppose02:45:14.720 - 10:43:55 AM; Hamdan, a concerned citizen, student at UNH, and Muslim from Manchester, opposes HR34. He emphasizes that the US is not a Christian or Jewish country and has no state religion, founded on principles of religious liberty due to persecution in Europe. He addresses a question from Representative Bennett by citing Surah Maida from the Quran, which instructs believers to fulfill contracts and abide by the law of the land. He argues that HR34 targets only Islam as an existential threat, lacking neutrality, and questions why it does not name other religions like Jewish, Hindu, or Christian. He explains that Sharia requires governance under a single Muslim ruler (Khalifa), which hasn't existed for over 100 years, so no true Sharia exists today. The bill's selective targeting prejudices Muslims, portraying them as threats or terrorists, creating a narrative of suspicion that damages religious freedom, legitimizes discrimination, and contradicts constitutional principles of neutrality and equal protection. He urges rejection of the bill to uphold principles over prejudice.
HR34: Charlene van Dorne Support02:48:21.200 - 10:47:02 AM; Charlene van Dorne supports HR34, agreeing with previous testimonies in favor. She clarifies that the bill is not against Muslims' freedom of religion or worship but targets Sharia law and political Islam's goal of taking over constitutions in countries they infiltrate, as seen elsewhere. She argues that the bill protects the US and state constitutions by ensuring no other laws, like Sharia, supersede them, preventing political Islamic control. She emphasizes looking beyond the current situation to their long-term plans and ongoing infiltration, advocating for protections now.
HR34: Charlene van Dorne Oppose02:48:21.200 - 10:47:02 AM; The speaker continued her testimony on the infiltration of radical Islam, referencing examples from Texas, Minnesota, Europe, and the UK where such groups have allegedly taken over. She emphasized the need to protect the U.S. Constitution from being overtaken by Sharia law or other foreign influences.
HR34: Unidentified Speaker Oppose02:51:07.520 - 10:49:48 AM; The speaker, responding to a question from Representative Fos, clarified that 'they' refers to radical Islamists, not regular Muslims. She described their goal as slow infiltration leading to takeover, citing examples from other countries like Europe and the UK. She stressed the importance of preventing Sharia law from taking over in the U.S. and protecting the Constitution, warning about global trends.
HCR16: Unidentified Speaker Oppose02:52:38.640 - 10:51:19 AM; The speaker clarified their position, stating they have no issue with Muslims living in New Hampshire, attending mosques, or practicing their prayers, but they oppose radical elements attempting to impose Sharia law on everyone else.
HCR16: Representative Belchure Information Only02:53:45.120 - 10:52:26 AM; The chair directs Representative Belchure, as a co-sponsor, to introduce HCR 16 for the record after the current testimony, noting she doesn't need to speak extensively but can say what she'd like.
HCR16: Committee Chair Information Only02:53:45.120 - 10:52:26 AM; The chair outlines procedural plans: calling Megan to testify next as she has been waiting; asking the prime sponsor to stay briefly before lunch; scheduling a quick red team caucus in the room and a blue team lunch caucus in the cafeteria; and planning a short chat with the ranking member after lunch.
HCR16: Canard Sain Information Only02:54:50.000 - 10:53:31 AM; The chair calls Canard Sain to testify, noting it was by random selection.
HCR16: Kennard Solden, Londonderry Oppose02:55:25.439 - 10:54:06 AM; Kennard Solden, an immigrant who moved to the US in 1960, opposes the bill defining Sharia as it is a fundamental religious concept in Islam representing God's code, the same God as in Judaism and Christianity. He explains Sharia encompasses ethical standards and behaviors, subject to interpretation like legal systems. The bill violates First Amendment principles. He argues the US Constitution incorporates Sharia-like elements, quoting the Declaration of Independence and Pledge of Allegiance. He suggests rendering the resolution inexpedient to legislate, recommends education on Islam via UNH or interfaith councils, and poses a rhetorical question about applying similar legislation to other religions like Presbyterianism or Mormonism. He shares his Christian background teaching Sunday school.
HCR16: Representative Belchure Information Only02:59:24.960 - 10:58:05 AM; Representative Belchure introduces HCR 16, a concurrent resolution making an application to Congress to propose a congressional term limits constitutional amendment. He notes it is not his bill but introduces it for the record.
HCR16: Megan Schmidt, Concord Oppose03:00:39.040 - 10:59:20 AM; Megan Schmidt opposes HCR 16, similar to HCR 13. She notes the founding fathers debated and rejected term limits in Article 5 of the Articles of Confederation, favoring frequent elections. Alexander Hamilton warned term limits weaken government, increasing reliance on bureaucrats. Term limits shift power from voters, reduce citizen accountability, muffle opinions, prevent experienced legislators from educating peers, and allow lame-duck officials to influence successors. The presidential example shows power shifting to unelected administrators. She sees term limits as a workaround for dissatisfaction with current results rather than addressing root issues. She mentions moving to NH six years ago and hearing calls for term limits due to upset with legislators.
HB1287 0198H: Committee Chair Information Only04:06:35.279 - 12:05:16 PM; The chair opens the executive session and defers action on HCR 16 (Sharia Law), HB 37 (Gaza), and HCR 14 (Charlie Kirk resolution) for further review and verification, to be determined later. Acknowledges guests and substitutes including Representatives Long, Osborne, Gison, and Kofalt. Notes birthdays of Ronald Reagan and Representative Gison.
HB1287 0198H: Representative Manion Support04:09:59.840 - 12:08:40 PM; Moves for Ought to Pass with amendment 0198H to HB 1287. Explains that the amendment addresses issues in the original bill by narrowing the definition of veteran to include general discharge under honorable conditions, aligning with the bill's intent, and restores the verification process for veteran status that was inadvertently removed.
HB1287 0198H: Representative Belchure Information Only04:11:08.560 - 12:09:49 PM; Seconds the motion to amend HB 1287 with amendment 0198H.
HB1287 0198H: Committee Clerk Information Only04:11:08.560 - 12:09:49 PM; Calls the vote on the amendment 0198H to HB 1287.
HB1287 0198H: Vice Chairman Rollins Vote04:11:08.560 - 12:09:49 PM; Votes yes on the amendment.
HB1287 0198H: Representative Osborne Vote04:11:08.560 - 12:09:49 PM; Votes yes on the amendment.
HB1287 0198H: Representative Gison Vote04:11:08.560 - 12:09:49 PM; Votes yes on the amendment.
HB1287 0198H: Representative Gagy Vote04:11:08.560 - 12:09:49 PM; Votes yes on the amendment.
HB1287 0198H: Representative Manion Vote04:11:08.560 - 12:09:49 PM; Votes yes on the amendment.
HB1287 0198H: Representative Belchure Vote04:11:08.560 - 12:09:49 PM; Votes yes on the amendment.
HB1287 0198H: Representative Bennett Vote04:11:08.560 - 12:09:49 PM; Votes yes on the amendment.
HB1287 0198H: Representative Hemingway Vote04:11:08.560 - 12:09:49 PM; Votes yes on the amendment.
HB1287 0198H: Representative Kofalt Vote04:11:08.560 - 12:09:49 PM; Votes yes on the amendment.
HB1287 0198H: Committee Vote Vote04:12:34.560 - 12:11:15 PM; The committee voted 17-0 to pass amendment 0198H. Subsequent motion for Ought to Pass as Amended (OTPA) also passed 17-0.
HCR16: Representative Hemingway Information Only04:14:55.359 - 12:13:36 PM; Explained the motion for interim study on HCR16, noting it is duplicative of another bill (HCR13) and rescheduled to allow the other bill to be heard on its merits without signaling opposition.
HCR16: Representative Belchure Information Only04:16:02.319 - 12:14:43 PM; Added that interim study avoids accidentally opposing the duplicative bill on principle, emphasizing optics.
HCR16: Committee Vote Vote04:17:03.840 - 12:15:44 PM; Motion for interim study passed 17-0, placed on consent calendar with a report.
HR20: Representative Belchure Support04:19:17.600 - 12:17:58 PM; Moved Ought to Pass (OTP), explaining the resolution affirms the natural right to keep and bear arms for all persons, not derived from government. Clarified it excludes criminals based on historical precedent, alleviating concerns.
HR20: Committee Vote Vote04:20:10.800 - 12:18:51 PM; Motion for OTP passed 16-1, placed on consent calendar without minority report.
HR21 0088H: Representative Manion Support04:22:30.159 - 12:21:11 PM; Moved Ought to Pass with Amendment (OTPA). Amendment 0088H removes reference to the 2002 AUMF, already repealed. Explained the 2001 AUMF has been misused for operations beyond its scope, especially post-Bin Laden.
HR21 0088H: Chairman Moffett Information Only04:25:38.960 - 12:24:19 PM; Noted resolutions raise awareness and value in educating on issues like AUMF.
HR21 0088H: Committee Vote Vote04:23:40.960 - 12:22:21 PM; Amendment passed 17-0; OTPA passed 16-1, placed on consent calendar with report from Representative Manion.
HR23: Representative Belchure Oppose04:28:47.520 - 12:27:28 PM; Moved Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL), arguing the bill redefines literacy as political engagement per Paulo Freire, smuggles in media bias education, and increases elder vulnerability to fraud by promoting devices without safeguards.
HR23: Representative Cybert Support04:31:44.319 - 12:30:25 PM; Opposed ITL, noting elders already use devices and need help; emphasized fraud risks but saw the bill as solving a real problem without political conspiracy; highlighted internet necessity for bills.
HR23: Representative Bennett Oppose04:32:48.159 - 12:31:29 PM; Supported ITL due to fraud risks and temptation for young helpers; suggested family monitoring and more parameters, citing examples of elder scams.
HR23: Representative Lloyd Support04:35:12.480 - 12:33:53 PM; Opposed ITL, explaining the resolution from a Nashua high schooler aims to recognize digital literacy importance for healthcare access and civic engagement, not partisan; it's non-binding.
HR23: Representative Mandelbaum Support04:36:20.160 - 12:35:01 PM; As co-sponsor, clarified intent to affirm scam protection and digital literacy for elders without political intent.
HR23: Representative Foss Support04:37:23.359 - 12:36:04 PM; Opposed ITL, arguing 'civic engagement' isn't politicization; supports politically engaged seniors.
HR23: Representative Gagny Oppose04:38:34.000 - 12:37:15 PM; Supported ITL, concerned about third-party interference in elder tech help; prefers family involvement.
HR23: Representative Jones Support04:39:40.718 - 12:38:21 PM; Opposed ITL, citing federal recognition of digital equity for seniors and guardrails in Tech Pals; it's a supportive resolution.
HR23: Representative Bennett (additional) Oppose04:40:49.120 - 12:39:30 PM; Supported ITL, noting technology discriminates against elders; some prefer traditional methods without forcing digital adoption.
HR23: Representative Cybert (closing) Support04:42:00.080 - 12:40:41 PM; Added that not all elders have family support; some need alternatives like flip phones.
HR23: Committee Vote Vote04:42:47.200 - 12:41:28 PM; ITL passed 10-7; majority report by Belchure, minority by Mandelbaum.
HR26 0417H: Representative Cybert Support04:43:59.120 - 12:42:40 PM; Proposed amendment 0417H to update with recent US-DRC strategic partnership and ongoing violence by Rwanda-backed militias; calls for accountability. Shared personal family connection to Congo missions.
HR26 0417H: Chairman Moffett Information Only04:47:14.320 - 12:45:55 PM; Deferred action to ensure diligence and review amendment; sympathetic but wants to avoid unintended issues; will revisit later.
HCR12: Representative Belchure Oppose04:50:06.480 - 12:48:47 PM; Moved ITL, arguing no country achieves quality universal care; costs underestimated, leading to provider shortages like in UK/Canada; favors competition over more regulation.
HCR12: Representative Cybert Support04:54:07.440 - 12:52:48 PM; Opposed ITL, noting US rationing via costs; supports preventive care; resolution calls for alternatives, not strict Medicare model.
HCR12: Representative Mandelbaum Oppose04:56:05.200 - 12:54:46 PM; Opposed due to specific 'Medicare for all' mention; supports competition and preventive care but sees it as unfeasible without private network.
HCR12: Representative Gison Oppose04:57:13.040 - 12:55:54 PM; As VA user, warned government-run care leads to delays and bureaucracy; cites Community Care Act success with private providers.
HCR12: Representative Rollins Oppose04:59:02.958 - 12:57:43 PM; Shared Danish example where cash speeds care, putting wealthy ahead in universal systems.
HCR12: Representative Foss Support05:00:12.638 - 12:58:53 PM; Cited personal uninsured experiences; referenced compelling testimony from former Rep. Coffey.
HCR12: Representative Lloyd Support05:01:33.040 - 1:00:14 PM; Opposed ITL, noting 50,000 annual deaths from underinsurance; personal story of father's death due to cost fears.
HCR12: Representative Budasaki Support05:02:47.200 - 1:01:28 PM; Shared emergency care billing experience ($2,000+ despite insurance); system broken, needs alternative.
HCR12: Representative Jones Support05:03:52.718 - 1:02:33 PM; Opposed ITL; resolution sends message for change, away from stockholder-driven care; personal insurance issues.
HCR12: Representative Budasaki (additional) Support05:04:55.920 - 1:03:36 PM; Insurance covered $0 for emergency as not included.
HCR12: Representative Lloyd (additional) Support05:05:59.680 - 1:04:40 PM; Resolution calls for universal program, not strictly Medicare; Americans can design better system.
HCR12: Committee Vote Vote05:07:16.240 - 1:05:57 PM; ITL passed 11-6; majority by Belchure, minority by Lloyd.
HCR13: Representative Manion Support05:08:27.360 - 1:07:08 PM; Moved OTP, explaining term limits combat entrenched interests and donor focus in DC via Article V convention.
HCR13: Representative Rollins Support05:09:30.560 - 1:08:11 PM; Seconded, concurring with Manion.
HCR13: Representative Cybert Oppose05:10:28.080 - 1:09:09 PM; Opposed, agreeing on problem but arguing core issue is money in politics; term limits won't address it, affects both sides.
HCR13: Chairman Moffett Support05:12:23.520 - 1:11:04 PM; Supports based on hearing testimony; evolved views on Article V, no longer sees scare tactics as valid.
HCR13: Representative Foss Support05:13:26.160 - 1:12:07 PM; Opposed letting perfect be enemy of good; term limits could indirectly reduce money influence via relationships.
HCR13: Representative Belchure Support05:14:34.878 - 1:13:15 PM; Supports Article V effort despite seeing process as weak; doesn't want to block good-faith attempts.
HCR13: Representative Cyber Support05:15:04.400 - 1:13:45 PM; Supports term limits if applied to state offices as well.
HCR13: Representative Lloyd Oppose05:15:30.000 - 1:14:11 PM; Supports term limits but has concerns about the Article 5 convention process, including delegate selection and risk of it not being limited to the intended topic.
HCR13: Representative Jones Oppose05:16:17.200 - 1:14:58 PM; Agrees with concerns about Article 5; quotes former Chief Justice Warren Burger on the inability to control a constitutional convention.
HCR13: Representative Kofalt Support05:17:23.040 - 1:16:04 PM; Addresses runaway convention concerns; believes calling for a convention will pressure Congress to act on term limits without actually convening, based on historical precedents.
HCR13: Representative Bennett Support05:18:28.400 - 1:17:09 PM; Appreciates testimony from former representative and speaker; supports giving the resolution a try.
HCR13: Representative Lloyd Oppose05:19:42.718 - 1:18:23 PM; Acknowledges intent to force congressional action but concerned about the risk if Congress does not act, unwilling to risk the constitution.
HCR13: Chairman Moffett Information Only05:20:55.520 - 1:19:36 PM; Notes sympathy for term limits; suggests focusing on term limits vote separately from broader convention debate.
HCR13: Representative Osborne Support05:20:55.520 - 1:19:36 PM; Supports due to broad public bipartisan agreement on term limits; argues delegate selection is less concerning on this issue; shares anecdote on benefits of term limits for fresh representation.
HCR13: Representative Hemingway Support05:22:01.600 - 1:20:42 PM; Supports term limits citing long tenures in Congress leading to radical decisions; references public approval in NH and other states.
HCR13: Representative Cybert Support05:24:00.000 - 1:22:41 PM; Wishes for more public testimony over lobbyists; expresses trust issues but supports.
HCR13: Representative Manion Support05:25:07.040 - 1:23:48 PM; Notes only opposition from local GOP chair; heard support for term limits during door-knocking in Pelham.
HR32 2026-0419h: Representative Lloyd Support05:28:11.920 - 1:26:52 PM; Introduces amendment to make resolution more inclusive of tariffs across multiple administrations; highlights NH revenue loss due to tariffs and need to re-examine policies.
HR32 2026-0419h: Representative Foss Support05:29:24.638 - 1:28:05 PM; Supports amendment; views tariffs as sales tax, contrary to NH traditions; hopes removal of targeted language aids agreement.
HR32 2026-0419h: Chairman Moffett Support05:30:31.440 - 1:29:12 PM; Supports amendment as an improvement; removes president's name for broader consideration; plans discussion after amendment vote.
HR32 2026-0419h: Representative Lloyd Support05:32:34.558 - 1:31:15 PM; Recommends OTPA; emphasizes affordability issues exacerbated by tariffs in complex economy.
HR32 2026-0419h: Representative Foss Support05:33:49.920 - 1:32:30 PM; Seconds OTPA; constituents cannot afford tariff-induced price increases on essentials like rice and natural gas from Canada.
HR32 2026-0419h: Representative Belchure Oppose05:34:55.760 - 1:33:36 PM; Torn but opposes; acknowledges amendment improvement but sees tariffs positively for negotiating better deals and national security, including reshoring manufacturing; believes they lower costs overall.
HR32 2026-0419h: Representative Manion Support05:35:57.760 - 1:34:38 PM; Opposes additional tariffs like opposing income or sales tax in NH; notes tariffs have not replaced income tax.
HR32 2026-0419h: Chairman Moffett Support05:36:50.558 - 1:35:31 PM; Acknowledges economic impacts on NH like reduced Canadian tourism; views tariffs as consumer tax; praises amendment for broadening to multiple administrations, including Reagan, Biden; supports OTPA for raising awareness without personalization.
HR32 2026-0419h: Representative Foss Support05:41:08.638 - 1:39:49 PM; Responds that constituents suffer short-term from high prices on essentials; cannot wait for potential long-term trade benefits.
HR32 2026-0419h: Representative Lloyd Support05:42:16.958 - 1:40:57 PM; Shares family concerns about tariffs during holiday trip to McPherson, Kansas; notes bipartisan worries and desire to address issues across administrations.
HR32 2026-0419h: Representative Jones Support05:43:32.558 - 1:42:13 PM; Highlights resolution's call to terminate president's unilateral tariff use under emergencies, requiring congressional approval for better checks and balances.
HR32 2026-0419h: Chairman Moffett Support05:43:32.558 - 1:42:13 PM; Emphasizes reviewing efficacy of tariff policies as a broad, healthy engagement; supports OTPA.

Moffett, Michael(Chairman)(R)[B+]2025	Mandelbaum, Jennifer(Clerk)(D)[D]2025	Rollins, Skip(V Chairman)(R)[A-]2025
Jeudy, Jean(D)[D]2025	Budathoki, Suraj(D)[D-]2025	Foss, Lily(D)[D-]2025
Gagne, Larry(R)[B+]2025	Lundgren, David(R)[C+]2025	Leavitt, John(R)[B-]2025
Belcher, Mike(R)[B+]2025	Plante, Raymond(R)[B+]2025	Hemingway, Wayne(R)[B]2025
Mannion, Tom(R)[A+]2025	Lloyd, Christal(D)[F]2025	Seibert, Christine(D)[CT]2025
Jones, Philip(D)[CT]2025	Manohar, Sanjeev(D)[D-]2025	Bennett, Cindy(R)[B+]2025