Committee Summary for House Resources, Recreation and Development (04/16/2025)

Bill/Time	Type	Title	Sponsor
SB27 00:05:19.039 - 9:04:05 AM	Public Hearing	relative to dwellings over water.	Lang, Timothy(R)[B-]2025
SB241 00:53:40.160 - 9:52:26 AM	Public Hearing	relative to construction of a public pier on Hampton Beach and making an appropriation therefor.	Avard, Kevin(R)[B]2025
SB299 01:39:55.000 - 10:38:41 AM	Public Hearing	relative to penalties for contractors violating water pollution and waste disposal regulations.	Pearl, Howard (R)[B]2025
SB110 03:02:58.640 - 12:01:44 PM	Public Hearing	relative to terrain permitting.	Lang, Timothy(R)[B-]2025
SB110 03:04:42.600 - 12:03:28 PM	Public Hearing	relative to terrain permitting.	Lang, Timothy(R)[B-]2025
SB27 04:06:05.760 - 1:04:51 PM	Executive Session	relative to dwellings over water.	Lang, Timothy(R)[B-]2025
SB241 04:08:30.720 - 1:07:16 PM	Executive Session	relative to construction of a public pier on Hampton Beach and making an appropriation therefor.	Avard, Kevin(R)[B]2025
SB299 04:13:34.359 - 1:12:20 PM	Executive Session	relative to penalties for contractors violating water pollution and waste disposal regulations.	Pearl, Howard (R)[B]2025
SB110 04:15:33.159 - 1:14:19 PM	Executive Session	relative to terrain permitting.	Lang, Timothy(R)[B-]2025

SB27: Trisha Milo, Senate Majority Caucus Director Support00:05:19.039 - 9:04:05 AM; Trisha Milo, representing Senator Lang, introduced Senate Bill 27, which aims to align improvements to dwellings over water with the state building code. She mentioned that Attorney Cronin was present to answer any detailed questions about the bill.
SB27: John Cronin, Attorney Support00:07:17.840 - 9:06:03 AM; John Cronin, a land use attorney, discussed the origins and implications of Senate Bill 27. He explained that the bill was initiated due to a case involving older homes near water bodies, specifically mentioning Lake Winnipesaukee. He detailed a situation where homeowners, the Nukems, rehabilitated a home from the 1950s, which led to a dispute over state permits. Cronin argued that the improvements had no negative environmental impact and could benefit the community. He mentioned amendments made in the Senate, including a condition that no new structures be built in the water. He also discussed the potential for the Department of Environmental Services (DES) to have waiver power in appropriate circumstances to avoid unnecessary costs and to allow beneficial improvements.
SB27: Representative Gould Information Only00:13:48.480 - 9:12:34 AM; Representative Gould asked about the specifics of the improvements shown in the photographs, particularly whether the deck was the only part over the water, as the bill references 'overwater'.
SB27: Representative Nab Information Only00:15:22.639 - 9:14:08 AM; Representative Nab inquired about the definition of 'living space' in the context of the bill, expressing concern about the potential for misuse to add bedrooms to existing structures.
SB27: Representative Donnelly Information Only00:16:50.720 - 9:15:36 AM; Representative Donnelly asked about the number of homes that could potentially benefit from the bill's passage, to which Attorney Cronin responded that while he couldn't give an exact number, it would be a small percentage of the total properties in the state.
SB27: Representative Darby Information Only00:16:50.720 - 9:15:36 AM; Representative Darby raised concerns about the DES's need to be familiar with local building codes due to the bill's language. He also questioned the ownership of the water under the new deck, to which Cronin responded that it would typically be considered public water.
SB27: Baldwin Information Only00:19:47.080 - 9:18:33 AM; Baldwin provided context about the structure in question, explaining the previous setup with jealousy balconies and sliders. He responded to a question about Darlene Forst's letter regarding the expansion of decks under the bill, stating that DES still has the authority to approve or deny waivers, which would prevent unlimited expansion of decks.
SB27: Representative Nav Information Only00:23:08.720 - 9:21:54 AM; Representative Nav discussed the definition of 'footprint' as it relates to the bill, suggesting it refers to the foundation's perimeter. He expressed concern about DES's ability to deny deck expansions based on legal terms and questioned the bill's implications on deck size without new footings.
SB27: Representative Dupont Information Only00:25:35.200 - 9:24:21 AM; Representative Dupont discussed the possibility of building a deck across water from land to land and questioned if the bill would allow such a structure to extend 12 feet from the house, emphasizing the need for DES approval.
SB27: Representative Sergeant Information Only00:27:04.080 - 9:25:50 AM; Representative Sergeant referenced the case of Robert Newcomb, discussing its relevance to the bill. He highlighted that the case involved maintenance, which is already covered under existing laws, and noted that without a change or this bill, structures like the one in question might need to be torn down.
SB27: Representative Taylor Information Only00:29:53.279 - 9:28:39 AM; Representative Taylor inquired if the bill should cover smaller bodies of water and streams. The response focused on ensuring no negative environmental impact from any improvements, suggesting that DES should evaluate such impacts.
SB27: Representative Nab Information Only00:32:01.760 - 9:30:47 AM; Representative Nab clarified that DES, like planning boards, must follow regulations and cannot deny projects based solely on personal opinion.
SB27: Representative Darby Information Only00:32:15.600 - 9:31:01 AM; Representative Darby confirmed details about the structure's previous state and the approval process for the new deck, noting that the building inspector had approved the cantilevered design.
SB27: Darlene Forest Information Only00:34:28.480 - 9:33:14 AM; Darlene Forest, Wetlands Bureau administrator at the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, expressed surprise at the bill's discussion, believing it was sent for interim study. She raised concerns about the bill's clarity and its potential impact on ongoing cases. Forest also discussed the legal and environmental implications of regulating structures over public waters, emphasizing the need for clear legislative guidance and expressing DES's reservations about being given waiver authority in this context.
SB27: Representative Sergeant, representing Newbury and New London Support00:43:04.800 - 9:41:50 AM; Representative Sergeant expressed support for the Department of Environmental Services' (DES) recommendation for an interim study on the bill. He mentioned discussing the issue with the Lake Sunapee Protective Association, who also supported the study. Additionally, he spoke with a constituent who owns one of the houses in question and asked a general question about reconstruction under current law if the house were destroyed, to which the answer was affirmative.
SB27: Representative (name not specified) Information Only00:44:18.640 - 9:43:04 AM; The representative raised a concern about life safety issues related to the living space of the houses, specifically questioning the structural integrity due to water exposure. The response clarified that current law allows for maintenance or even improvements in material for better longevity, ensuring the structures can be maintained safely.
SB27: Representative (name not specified) Information Only00:45:35.920 - 9:44:21 AM; The representative inquired about the steps and information needed for an interim study, focusing on the need to clarify terms and inconsistencies in the law regarding reconstruction, expansion, and conversion of commercial use. The discussion also touched on the historical context and potential legislative intent behind existing laws.
SB27: Representative (name not specified) Information Only00:46:53.680 - 9:45:39 AM; The representative asked about the implications of a dam failure on lake levels and property rights, particularly if the water level were to drop significantly. The response detailed the different scenarios based on whether the water body was naturally impounded or dammed, and the legal implications of such scenarios, including historical context and legislative limits.
SB27: Representative (name not specified) Information Only00:49:54.880 - 9:48:40 AM; The representative sought clarification on the waiver process used by DES, particularly how it applies to specific cases. The response explained that the waiver process is linked to a specific case in Portsmouth around 2007-2008, allowing conversion of commercial to living space based on reduced loading. It was noted that DES has not issued such waivers due to a lack of clear legislative authority and seeks further guidance.
SB27: Representative Taylor Information Only00:52:11.359 - 9:50:57 AM; Representative Taylor inquired about other cases pending legislation involving buildings over water. He was not aware of any specific cases that invoke the statute in question.
SB241: Senator Avard, District 12 Support00:53:40.160 - 9:52:26 AM; Senator Avard, the prime sponsor, expressed strong support for the bill to construct a public pier at Hampton Beach. He highlighted the bill's purpose to establish a dedicated fund for the pier's construction, emphasizing the use of private donations and grant money due to budget constraints. He shared personal anecdotes about the need for better beach access for handicapped individuals, citing the potential for the pier to extend the beach season, enhance tourism, and generate revenue. Avard also discussed safety concerns, suggesting that the pier could serve as a safer alternative to the jetty and a platform for quick rescues. He addressed concerns about the pier's durability against harsh weather, comparing it to successful piers in other states and expressing optimism about its feasibility and benefits for the state and disability community.
SB241: Representative Vale Information Only01:02:10.880 - 10:00:56 AM; Representative Vale sought clarification on the bill's language regarding the governor's authorization to draw funds from the treasury. Senator Avard confirmed that the appropriation mentioned was only a dollar, as per the amended bill.
SB241: Representative Nab Information Only01:03:38.720 - 10:02:24 AM; Representative Nab asked about the intended design and length of the pier. Senator Avard explained that several designs were considered, with the pier likely to extend about 1,000 feet from the shoreline, accommodating wheelchairs and potentially including indented areas for relaxation. He highlighted the pier's potential to extend the beach season and positively impact local businesses.
SB241: Representative Donnelly Information Only01:05:41.920 - 10:04:27 AM; Representative Donnelly raised concerns about the pier's maintenance and funding in the event of damage by natural disasters. Senator Avard responded that existing mechanisms and potential state involvement could fund repairs, citing other successful piers as examples.
SB241: Representative Lonnie Information Only01:06:59.280 - 10:05:45 AM; Representative Lonnie inquired about projections of revenue the pier could bring to local businesses. Senator Avard mentioned that while specific studies were not available, the pier's potential as a tourist destination could positively impact local hospitality and potentially support a casino.
SB241: Representative Gold Information Only01:08:33.520 - 10:07:19 AM; Representative Gold asked for clarification on the pier's location. Senator Avard explained that it would extend from an alleyway near the state park bathrooms, avoiding the jetty due to restrictions by the Army Corps of Engineers.
SB241: Representative Derby Information Only01:08:33.520 - 10:07:19 AM; Representative Derby expressed concerns about the feasibility of the pier's construction within the bill's timeframe and funding structure. Senator Avard clarified that construction would only proceed if sufficient funds were raised, otherwise, the funds would be used for accessibility improvements at the beach.
SB241: Representative from Hampton Information Only01:12:06.640 - 10:10:52 AM; The representative expressed concerns about the bill, focusing on the potential impact on the state park fund. They highlighted the risk of the fund being depleted due to catastrophic storm damage to the proposed pier. They appreciated the advocacy for the beach but were concerned about the state's financial ability to maintain such a project. They questioned the funding mechanism and suggested additional fees for pier access or parking as a potential solution. They also mentioned their personal connection to Hampton Beach, emphasizing its value to the community and the need for a strong structure to withstand storms.
SB241: Chris Muns, State Representative from Rockingham District 29, Hampton Oppose01:18:01.080 - 10:16:47 AM; Representative Muns opposed the bill, citing it as the fourth attempt since 2021 to construct a pier at Hampton Beach. He detailed the history of previous bills and studies, none of which were sponsored by anyone from Hampton. He expressed concerns from his constituents about the lack of awareness and perceived necessity of the pier, potential traffic and parking issues, and the burden on local infrastructure. He criticized the high cost and moderate public support as per a recent study, suggesting alternative, lower-cost solutions for accessibility. He urged the committee to recommend the bill as inexpedient to legislate, emphasizing the need to address more pressing local issues like flooding instead.
SB241: Vanessa Blae, Director of Policy and Planning, New Hampshire Council on Developmental Disabilities Support01:31:44.120 - 10:30:30 AM; Vanessa Blae expressed the New Hampshire Council on Developmental Disabilities' support for the project, emphasizing the importance of making recreation accessible in New Hampshire. She highlighted the council's previous funding for projects like all-access trails and an accessible boat launch in the lakes region. Blae discussed the economic benefits of making the state more welcoming to people with disabilities, who travel and spend money in areas where they can enjoy accessible facilities. She addressed concerns about the project, acknowledging the environmental study done and expressing satisfaction with the recommendations. Blae pointed out limitations of current accessibility tools at the beach, such as the seasonal mats and limited availability of recreational wheelchairs, which do not allow for independent access to the water. She supported the state's efforts to continue such projects and answered questions about the accessibility from parking areas to the proposed pier and the council's involvement in reviewing broader accessibility studies for the state park.
SB299: Senator Howard Pearl, District 17, Loudon Support01:39:55.000 - 10:38:41 AM; Senator Howard Pearl introduced Senate Bill 299, explaining that the current penalty provisions in the Shoreland Protection Act do not sufficiently address violations by contractors who work without necessary permits or ignore permit criteria. He highlighted that such practices give these contractors an unfair advantage and leave property owners to deal with the consequences of violations. Pearl noted that while most contractors follow the law, some bad actors cause violations without their clients' knowledge. He pointed out a loophole where, if a property owner restores a site after being notified of a violation, the state has no mechanism to penalize the contractor responsible for the violation. The senator emphasized that this bill aims to close this loophole and mentioned that it passed the Senate without objection. He offered members of the DEES team to answer specific questions about the Shoreland Protection Act.
SB299: Andrea Lamaro, President, New Hampshire Lakes Support01:43:00.639 - 10:41:46 AM; Andrea Lamaro, representing New Hampshire Lakes, expressed support for Senate Bill 299. She explained that the bill is seen as common sense and crucial for closing a loophole in the Shoreland Protection Act. Lamaro emphasized the importance of the bill in protecting lakes from contractors who do not follow the law and in safeguarding homeowners who might inadvertently hire non-compliant contractors. She noted that 250 members of their community also signed in support of the bill.
SB299: Andrea Lamaro, President, New Hampshire Lakes Support01:43:00.639 - 10:41:46 AM; Andrea Lamaro, President of New Hampshire Lakes, supported the bill, stating the importance of contractors adhering to regulations to protect shoreland. She emphasized that without mechanisms to penalize contractors, the burden falls on the homeowner for restoration, and she deferred specifics to Darlene Force from DEES.
SB299: Darlene Force, Wetlands Bureau Administrator, New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Support01:47:15.040 - 10:46:01 AM; Darlene Force, from the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, supported the legislation, explaining that the current law does not adequately address repeat offenders among contractors. She highlighted the need for the bill to provide a tool for encouraging contractors to adhere to regulations through education and potential fines. She mentioned the difficulties faced by homeowners when contractors do not follow the necessary permits and regulations, and the department's efforts to educate contractors through various means.
SB299: Representative Taylor Support01:51:51.239 - 10:50:37 AM; Representative Taylor expressed hope that DEES would take action if the bill passes, increasing penalties for administrative fines, and viewed the proposal positively.
SB299: Representative Darby Information Only01:51:51.239 - 10:50:37 AM; Representative Darby asked Darlene Force about opportunities for contractors to be educated on best practices. Darlene Force responded by detailing various educational efforts and outreach strategies by DEES, including workshops, events, and online resources.
SB299: Representative Information Only01:54:31.760 - 10:53:17 AM; A representative inquired about the definition of 'contractor' in the bill, noting it was not defined in the broader chapter or the bill itself. Darlene Force mentioned that DEES would not be opposed to defining the term either in statute or through rulemaking during the readoption of shoreland rules in 2026.
SB110: Peter O'Neal, Senate Communications Director Support03:02:58.640 - 12:01:44 PM; Peter O'Neal, representing Senator Tim Lang, introduced Senate Bill 110FN, which establishes fees for terrain alteration applications and requires DEES to adopt rules for certain projects. He noted that the bill's effective date is 60 days after passage and mentioned that he would not be taking questions, referring the committee to subsequent speakers for more detailed information.
SB110: Matt Mayberry, CEO of the New Hampshire Homebuilders Association Support03:04:42.600 - 12:03:28 PM; Matt Mayberry testified in support of the bill, emphasizing the potential benefits for addressing New Hampshire's housing crisis. He highlighted that the bill would not cost taxpayers any money but would facilitate a private-public partnership with the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (DES). Mayberry explained that the bill would allow developers to fast-track terrain alteration permits, proposing an increase in the alteration of terrain (AOT) threshold from 100,000 to 150,000 square feet. This change would enable developers to build more homes without waiting for formal DES approval, specifically noting that this adjustment would be suitable for developments with about six homes. He also mentioned that this is part of a broader set of bills aimed at reducing red tape and bureaucracy to improve housing development.
SB110: Meredith Hatfield, The Nature Conservancy Oppose03:15:16.359 - 12:14:02 PM; Meredith Hatfield expressed concerns about the bill on behalf of The Nature Conservancy. While acknowledging the Senate's efforts to improve the bill, she raised issues about its broad application, suggesting it should be limited to housing projects. Hatfield questioned whether the increased fees in the bill would be sufficient to cover the additional staff time needed at DES for the increased number of projects under the permit by notification (PBN) process. She also discussed the implications of increasing the AOT threshold from 100,000 to 150,000 square feet, noting the reduction from the original bill's proposal.
SB110: Philip Trobridge, Manager of the Land Resources Management Program at New Hampshire DES Information Only03:17:49.279 - 12:16:35 PM; Philip Trobridge provided detailed information about the alteration of terrain permitting process and its objectives, which include erosion control, maintaining site hydrology, and groundwater recharge. He explained the implications of the bill, which aims to expedite permitting processes in response to the housing crisis, aligning with initiatives in HB2. Trobridge noted the bill's amendment by the Senate to implement a permit by notification process for projects between 100,000 and 150,000 square feet, not subject to the Shoreland Protection Act, and the associated fee increases. He also addressed concerns raised by the Regional Management Advisory Committee (RMAC) about the review timeframes and proposed that these could be managed through rules requiring consultation before PBN submissions.
SB110: Representative Darby Information Only03:24:03.120 - 12:22:49 PM; Representative Darby asked for clarification on whether the language in the Senate amended version of HB2 matches the original version, confirming it does.
SB110: Philip Trobridge, Manager of the Land Resources Management Program at New Hampshire DES Information Only03:25:08.080 - 12:23:54 PM; Philip Trobridge responded to Representative Darby's question, confirming the language check. He then addressed a question about the recourse if the DES finds issues with submitted plans. He explained that they plan to implement a compliance assurance auditing process, which includes random auditing to ensure accuracy in project execution. If work does not meet permit conditions, they have a progressive discipline process starting with requests for correction and escalating to formal enforcement if necessary.
SB110: Representative Nab Information Only03:25:38.000 - 12:24:24 PM; Representative Nab asked about the breakdown of permits between housing and commercial projects. Philip Trobridge responded that approximately 30% of alteration of terrain projects are for housing, though it's challenging to categorize projects due to multi-use developments.
SB110: Representative Nab Information Only03:26:45.080 - 12:25:31 PM; Representative Nab questioned the necessity of SB110FN if similar language is already included in HB2 as amended by 1488H. Philip Trobridge noted that SB110FN was introduced first and needs to complete its legislative process.
SB27: Representative Donnelly Vote04:06:05.760 - 1:04:51 PM; Representative Donnelly moved to retain SB27 FN.
SB27: Representative Bridal Vote04:06:05.760 - 1:04:51 PM; Representative Bridal seconded the motion to retain SB27 FN.
SB27: Representative Davis Information Only04:07:07.520 - 1:05:53 PM; Voted yes on retaining SB27.
SB27: Representative Gould Information Only04:07:07.520 - 1:05:53 PM; Voted yes on retaining SB27.
SB27: Representative Donnelly Information Only04:07:07.520 - 1:05:53 PM; Voted yes on retaining SB27.
SB27: Clerk Information Only04:07:07.520 - 1:05:53 PM; Voted yes on retaining SB27.
SB27: Representative Bridle Information Only04:07:07.520 - 1:05:53 PM; Voted yes on retaining SB27.
SB27: Representative Dupont Information Only04:07:07.520 - 1:05:53 PM; Voted yes on retaining SB27.
SB27: Representative Lenny Information Only04:07:07.520 - 1:05:53 PM; Voted yes on retaining SB27.
SB27: Representative Taylor Information Only04:07:07.520 - 1:05:53 PM; Voted yes on retaining SB27.
SB27: Representative Nab Information Only04:07:07.520 - 1:05:53 PM; Voted yes on retaining SB27.
SB27: Representative Vale Information Only04:07:07.520 - 1:05:53 PM; Voted no on retaining SB27.
SB27: Representative Baldwin Information Only04:07:07.520 - 1:05:53 PM; Voted on retaining SB27, response not recorded.
SB27: Representative Darby Information Only04:07:07.520 - 1:05:53 PM; Voted yes on retaining SB27.
SB27: Representative Ryan Information Only04:07:07.520 - 1:05:53 PM; Voted yes on retaining SB27.
SB27: Representative Buco Information Only04:07:07.520 - 1:05:53 PM; Voted yes on retaining SB27.
SB27: Representative Sergeant Information Only04:07:07.520 - 1:05:53 PM; Voted yes on retaining SB27.
SB27: Chair Information Only04:07:07.520 - 1:05:53 PM; Voted yes on retaining SB27. Confirmed the retention of SB27 and mentioned that it would be added to the list of retained bills.
SB241: Representative Bridal Support04:08:30.720 - 1:07:16 PM; Moved to pass SB241 as is (OTP). Explained that the investment in projects that bring people together is important and the appropriation of $1 allows future opportunities without finalizing the project.
SB241: Representative Dupant Support04:08:30.720 - 1:07:16 PM; Seconded the motion to pass SB241 as is and agreed with Representative Bridal's reasoning.
SB241: Representative Darby Oppose04:09:45.040 - 1:08:31 PM; Expressed concerns about SB241, citing three reasons: the bill should fund all accessibility improvements recommended in the recent Hampton Beach State Park accessibility feasibility study, not just the pier; the high maintenance costs of the pier, estimated between $150,000 and $350,000 annually, with unclear funding sources; and the 10-year fund closure date, which may not be sufficient to complete the pier project due to its estimated construction time and fundraising needs.
SB241: Representative Vale Oppose04:11:26.399 - 1:10:12 PM; Voted against the ought to pass motion for SB241. Mentioned concerns about regional planning, environmental accessibility, bicycle access, and traffic impact, and the lack of testimony from the Chamber of Commerce or DNCR. Felt the bill was premature and lacked detail on how it interfaces with other involved parties.
SB241: Representative Davis Support04:12:41.840 - 1:11:27 PM; Voted yes on SB241 ought to pass.
SB241: Representative Gould Support04:12:41.840 - 1:11:27 PM; Voted yes on SB241 ought to pass.
SB241: Representative Donnelly Support04:12:41.840 - 1:11:27 PM; Voted yes on SB241 ought to pass.
SB241: Clerk Roach Support04:12:41.840 - 1:11:27 PM; Voted yes on SB241 ought to pass.
SB241: Representative Bridle Support04:12:41.840 - 1:11:27 PM; Voted yes on SB241 ought to pass.
SB241: Representative Dupon Support04:12:41.840 - 1:11:27 PM; Voted yes on SB241 ought to pass.
SB241: Representative Lenny Support04:12:41.840 - 1:11:27 PM; Voted yes on SB241 ought to pass.
SB241: Representative Taylor Support04:12:41.840 - 1:11:27 PM; Voted yes on SB241 ought to pass.
SB241: Representative Nab Oppose04:12:41.840 - 1:11:27 PM; Voted no on SB241 ought to pass.
SB241: Representative Vale Oppose04:12:41.840 - 1:11:27 PM; Voted no on SB241 ought to pass.
SB241: Representative Baldwin Support04:12:41.840 - 1:11:27 PM; Voted yes on SB241 ought to pass.
SB241: Representative Derby Oppose04:12:41.840 - 1:11:27 PM; Voted no on SB241 ought to pass.
SB241: Representative Ryan Oppose04:12:41.840 - 1:11:27 PM; Voted no on SB241 ought to pass.
SB241: Representative Buco Oppose04:12:41.840 - 1:11:27 PM; Voted no on SB241 ought to pass.
SB241: Representative Sergeant Support04:12:41.840 - 1:11:27 PM; Voted yes on SB241 ought to pass.
SB241: Chair Support04:12:41.840 - 1:11:27 PM; Voted yes on SB241 ought to pass. Closed the executive session on SB241.
SB299: Representative Dupont Support04:13:34.359 - 1:12:20 PM; Moved to pass SB299 as is, stating it's a good bill that protects homeowners and reigns in bad actors.
SB299: Representative S Support04:13:34.359 - 1:12:20 PM; Seconded the motion to pass SB299, describing it as a great bipartisan bill.
SB299: Representative Davis Support04:14:55.199 - 1:13:41 PM; Voted yes on SB299 ought to pass.
SB299: Representative Gold Support04:14:55.199 - 1:13:41 PM; Voted yes on SB299 ought to pass.
SB299: Representative Donnelly Support04:14:55.199 - 1:13:41 PM; Voted yes on SB299 ought to pass.
SB299: Clerk Support04:14:55.199 - 1:13:41 PM; Voted yes on SB299 ought to pass.
SB299: Representative Bridle Support04:14:55.199 - 1:13:41 PM; Voted yes on SB299 ought to pass.
SB299: Representative Dupont Support04:14:55.199 - 1:13:41 PM; Voted yes on SB299 ought to pass.
SB299: Representative Lenny Support04:14:55.199 - 1:13:41 PM; Voted yes on SB299 ought to pass.
SB299: Representative Taylor Support04:14:55.199 - 1:13:41 PM; Voted yes on SB299 ought to pass.
SB299: Representative Nab Support04:14:55.199 - 1:13:41 PM; Voted yes on SB299 ought to pass.
SB299: Representative Vale Support04:14:55.199 - 1:13:41 PM; Voted yes on SB299 ought to pass.
SB299: Representative Baldwin Support04:14:55.199 - 1:13:41 PM; Voted yes on SB299 ought to pass.
SB299: Representative Darby Support04:14:55.199 - 1:13:41 PM; Voted yes on SB299 ought to pass.
SB299: Representative Ryan Support04:14:55.199 - 1:13:41 PM; Voted yes on SB299 ought to pass.
SB299: Representative Buco Support04:14:55.199 - 1:13:41 PM; Voted yes on SB299 ought to pass.
SB299: Representative Sergeant Support04:14:55.199 - 1:13:41 PM; Voted yes on SB299 ought to pass.
SB299: Chair Support04:14:55.199 - 1:13:41 PM; Voted yes on SB299 ought to pass. Closed the executive session on SB299.
SB110: Representative Donnelly Support04:15:33.159 - 1:14:19 PM; Moved to pass SB110 as is, explaining that it came from the Senate but was also passed in House Bill HB2, making it somewhat redundant but necessary to ensure passage.
SB110: Representative Darby Support04:15:33.159 - 1:14:19 PM; Seconded the motion to pass SB110 as is, reaffirming Representative Donnelly's points and emphasizing the importance of a strong House position on the issue.
SB110: Unnamed Speaker Information Only04:16:41.760 - 1:15:27 PM; The speaker discussed the example of HB2, suggesting that it shows how regulations can be scaled back while still protecting the environment and enabling the government to work effectively for its citizens. They highlighted this as a great example of promoting housing development within the state.
SB110: Clerk Information Only04:17:00.000 - 1:15:46 PM; The clerk conducted a roll call vote on SB110. The results were as follows: Representative Davis - Yes, Representative Gould - Not recorded, Representative Donnelly - Yes, Clerk - Yes, Representative Bridle - Yes, Representative Dupont - Yes, Representative Lenny - Yes, Representative Taylor - Yes, Representative Nab - Yes, Representative Vale - No, Representative Baldwin - Not recorded, Representative Darby - Yes, Representative Ryan - Yes, Representative Buco - Yes, Representative Sergeant - Yes, and the Chair - Yes. The final vote count was 15-1 in favor of SB110 passing.
SB110: Chair Information Only04:18:06.159 - 1:16:52 PM; The Chair announced that SB110 FN will go on consent without a minority report. They then closed the executive session on SB110 FN and stated that it concluded all the bills for the session. They also mentioned closing the exact session for the day and turning off the microphone as reminded by Christie.

Harb, Robert(Chairman)(R)[B+]2025	Taylor, Brian(Clerk)(R)[C]2025	Dunn, Ron(V Chairman)(R)[A]2025
Buco, Thomas(D)[D]2025	Vail, Suzanne(D)[CT]2025	Gould, Linda(R)[B+]2025
Tremblay, Marc(R)	Ryan, Linda(D)[D-]2025	Darby, Will(D)[CT]2025
Donnelly, Tanya(R)[B+]2025	Knab, Allison(D)[CT]2025	Sargent, Gregory(D)[D-]2025
Baldwin, Heather(D)[F]2025	Dupont, Pierre(R)[B]2025	Davis, Arnold(R)[B+]2025
Bridle, Nicholas(R)[C]2025