Committee Summary for House Municipal and County Government (01/20/2026)

Bill/Time	Type	Title	Sponsor
HB1690 00:05:10.720 - 8:33:31 AM	Public Hearing	relative to impact fees.	Perez, Kristine(R)[B+]2025
HB1461 00:30:03.440 - 8:58:24 AM	Public Hearing	encouraging municipalities with sewage systems to extend system service to neighboring communities.	Veilleux, Daniel(D)[F]2025
HB1344 00:56:50.319 - 9:25:11 AM	Public Hearing	relative to intermunicipal compacts.	Sweeney, Joe(R)[A]2025
HB1273 01:15:53.040 - 9:44:14 AM	Public Hearing	enabling municipal support and incentives for residential flood resilience improvements.	Muns, Chris(D)[CT]2025
HB1468 01:33:28.719 - 10:01:49 AM	Public Hearing	relative to municipal flood resilience planning and the use of planning grants.	Vail, Suzanne(D)[CT]2025
HB1759 01:42:54.560 - 10:11:15 AM	Public Hearing	relative to the disqualification of a member of a local land use board.	Fracht, David(D)[D-]2025
HB1497 01:59:42.159 - 10:28:03 AM	Public Hearing	relative to replacing members of local land use boards for certain conduct.	Aylward, Deborah(R)[B+]2025
HB1497 02:27:16.000 - 10:55:37 AM	Public Hearing	relative to replacing members of local land use boards for certain conduct.	Aylward, Deborah(R)[B+]2025
HB1246 02:33:44.080 - 11:02:05 AM	Public Hearing	relative to planning board members serving on other local boards.	Fracht, David(D)[D-]2025
HB1802 02:39:28.080 - 11:07:49 AM	Public Hearing	relative to training, testing, and certification of local land use board members and making an appropriations therefor.	Aylward, Deborah(R)[B+]2025
HB1479 03:19:30.960 - 11:47:51 AM	Public Hearing	repealing the motor vehicle registration permit fee.	Ankarberg, Aidan(I)[IN]2025
HB1690 05:32:42.798 - 2:01:03 PM	Executive Session	relative to impact fees.	Perez, Kristine(R)[B+]2025
HB1461 05:37:37.440 - 2:05:58 PM	Executive Session	encouraging municipalities with sewage systems to extend system service to neighboring communities.	Veilleux, Daniel(D)[F]2025
HB1344 05:43:21.280 - 2:11:42 PM	Executive Session	relative to intermunicipal compacts.	Sweeney, Joe(R)[A]2025
HB1468 05:46:06.160 - 2:14:27 PM	Executive Session	relative to municipal flood resilience planning and the use of planning grants.	Vail, Suzanne(D)[CT]2025
HB1497 05:49:34.878 - 2:17:55 PM	Executive Session	relative to replacing members of local land use boards for certain conduct.	Aylward, Deborah(R)[B+]2025
HB1246 05:53:13.680 - 2:21:34 PM	Executive Session	relative to planning board members serving on other local boards.	Fracht, David(D)[D-]2025
HB1802 05:57:16.878 - 2:25:37 PM	Executive Session	relative to training, testing, and certification of local land use board members and making an appropriations therefor.	Aylward, Deborah(R)[B+]2025
HB1479 06:04:43.200 - 2:33:04 PM	Executive Session	repealing the motor vehicle registration permit fee.	Ankarberg, Aidan(I)[IN]2025
HB1242 06:08:11.680 - 2:36:32 PM	Executive Session	requiring county convention budget estimates to delineate between funding used for operations of county government and funding used for other state or federal government purposes.	Murray, Alissandra(D)[D-]2025
HB1044 2026-000069h 06:12:36.240 - 2:40:57 PM	Executive Session	relative to the filling of vacancies in the office of a county commissioner.	Turcotte, Len(R)[B]2025
HB1296 2026-0152h 06:20:20.480 - 2:48:41 PM	Executive Session	relative to the conditions for, and procedures for the adoption of, the elderly tax exemption.	Kelly, Eileen(D)[F]2025
HB1278 06:28:15.360 - 2:56:36 PM	Executive Session	allowing municipalities, cities, and towns a grace period to adopt a simple-majority tax cap override procedure in perpetuity.	Turer, Eric(D)[F]2025
HB1383 06:32:45.680 - 3:01:06 PM	Executive Session	relative to methods for overriding local tax caps.	Turer, Eric(D)[F]2025
HB1227 06:39:10.798 - 3:07:31 PM	Executive Session	relative to the calculation of the local tax cap.	Gruber, James(D)[F]2025

HB1690: Representative Perez Support00:05:10.720 - 8:33:31 AM; Representative Perez introduced HB 1690, explaining that municipalities are facing financial pressures due to growth and need additional resources to manage increased demands on public safety services. The bill allows impact fees to be used for purchasing additional safety equipment for existing fleets, such as police cars, fire trucks, and emergency vehicles, to offset costs from new developments. She emphasized that this would help keep taxes down for citizens while ensuring safety for new residents. She addressed questions on definitions, regional impacts, and approvals, noting flexibility for municipalities.
HB1690: Chris Norwood, New Hampshire Association of Realtors Oppose00:22:22.400 - 8:50:43 AM; Chris Norwood testified in opposition, arguing that impact fees act as another form of taxation that increases development costs for both commercial and residential properties, exacerbating the housing affordability crisis with median home prices at $535,000. He noted that current laws already provide broad authority for impact fees, and adding provisions for fleet expansions could be arbitrary and hard to quantify compared to utilities like water. He highlighted that developments already contribute through property taxes and penalties for exiting current use, providing sufficient revenue without additional fees.
HB1461: Representative Dan Veu, Hillsboro 34, Amherst Support00:30:03.440 - 8:58:24 AM; Representative Veu introduced HB 1461, which facilitates intermunicipal cooperation for sewer extensions under existing RSA 53-A. The bill provides an expedited DES review process, prioritizes projects in state loan and grant programs, and allows cost recovery from developers or receiving communities to protect ratepayers. He explained that sewer access often hinders housing and economic development due to invisible municipal boundaries, and the bill enables efficient use of existing infrastructure for regional benefits. He cited examples like coordinating sewer planning with PFAS remediation projects.
HB1461: Representative Dan Vue, Hillsboro 34, Amherst Support00:32:18.480 - 9:00:39 AM; The sponsor concludes his testimony emphasizing that the bill is practical, helps municipalities coordinate infrastructure projects, protects ratepayers, and reduces unnecessary friction. He offers to answer questions.
HB1461: Representative Colby Information Only00:32:18.480 - 9:00:39 AM; Representative Colby asks the sponsor about the definition of 'priority housing project' or 'state housing and infrastructure priority' referenced in the bill on specific lines, inquiring if it exists in statute and how it would be determined.
HB1461: Representative Dan Vue, Hillsboro 34, Amherst Information Only00:33:42.480 - 9:02:03 AM; The sponsor explains that priorities would be determined by regional planning commissions, the state housing authority, or the governor. It provides criteria to prioritize projects under a broader plan, preventing arbitrary decisions by local boards.
HB1461: Representative Frock Information Only00:33:42.480 - 9:02:03 AM; Representative Frock asks if the bill prioritizes new or expansion projects over maintenance and repair of existing projects, based on the fiscal note.
HB1461: Representative Dan Vue, Hillsboro 34, Amherst Information Only00:35:07.440 - 9:03:28 AM; The sponsor states that the bill gives priority to new projects but includes flexibility for DES to handle urgent repairs or upgrades if they pose health or contamination risks.
HB1461: Representative Stavis Information Only00:35:07.440 - 9:03:28 AM; Representative Stavis expresses concern about DES being understaffed and asks if DES supports the bill and can absorb the workload for expedited reviews, referencing the fiscal note.
HB1461: Representative Dan Vue, Hillsboro 34, Amherst Information Only00:35:07.440 - 9:03:28 AM; The sponsor defers to DES to confirm their endorsement and capacity.
HB1461: Representative Walker Support00:36:27.040 - 9:04:48 AM; Representative Walker shares an example from Rochester where the town of Milton sought to connect to their sewer system but lacked the mechanism; he states this bill enables such connections and expresses full support.
HB1461: Representative Gilman Information Only00:36:27.040 - 9:04:48 AM; Representative Gilman asks if the legislative body must be consulted in expansions into another town.
HB1461: Representative Dan Vue, Hillsboro 34, Amherst Information Only00:37:32.000 - 9:05:53 AM; The sponsor clarifies that there is no mechanism for legislative body involvement; it would be a RSA 53-A agreement between municipalities, approved through DES.
HB1461: Representative Colby Information Only00:37:32.000 - 9:05:53 AM; Representative Colby asks about page two, section B, regarding costs to existing taxpayers from extensions, and if it would force higher taxes in the extension area, noting the $1.5 million per mile cost.
HB1461: Representative Dan Vue, Hillsboro 34, Amherst Information Only00:38:50.880 - 9:07:11 AM; The sponsor explains that costs are typically covered by bonds with debt service recovered through fees in the extension area, or through budgets, grants, or loans, ensuring long-term economic benefits.
HB1461: Madam Chair Information Only00:38:50.880 - 9:07:11 AM; The Chair asks for clarification on the process for deeming a project as priority housing, comparing it to school building aid applications, and if there's an application process with regional planning commissions or others.
HB1461: Representative Dan Vue, Hillsboro 34, Amherst Information Only00:40:08.640 - 9:08:29 AM; The sponsor describes how regional planning commissions produce housing reports on needs; DES would use statistics and criteria to prioritize without randomness, providing flexibility to set standards.
HB1461: Representative Davis Information Only00:41:26.240 - 9:09:47 AM; Representative Davis asks about referencing the state fund under RSA 485-A:7 for wastewater facilities as a funding source to encourage municipalities.
HB1461: Representative Dan Vue, Hillsboro 34, Amherst Information Only00:42:44.880 - 9:11:05 AM; The sponsor notes the bill avoids specificity to accommodate future funding; he supports an amendment if it improves the bill, allowing DES discretion on priorities.
HB1461: Representative Guthrie Information Only00:42:44.880 - 9:11:05 AM; Representative Guthrie asks if passage would open a community to connections from neighbors or if it's limited to border developments.
HB1461: Representative Dan Vue, Hillsboro 34, Amherst Information Only00:44:07.920 - 9:12:28 AM; The sponsor says it's up to the communities; expansions would likely be incremental, starting at borders, and not necessarily cover entire areas, similar to existing limited systems.
HB1461: N. Graves, Business and Industry Association Support00:44:57.200 - 9:13:18 AM; Mr. Graves supports the bill for encouraging regional cooperation on sewer expansions in areas needing economic growth. He notes it empowers local officials and may need a technical amendment for terminology, but provides tools for initiatives.
HB1461: Representative Colby Information Only00:45:53.760 - 9:14:14 AM; Representative Colby asks what constitutes a 'substantial' amount for state or federal funding on page two, line one, to determine applicability.
HB1461: N. Graves, Business and Industry Association Information Only00:47:10.560 - 9:15:31 AM; Mr. Graves suggests at least 51%, but recommends clarifying with Tracy Wood at DES for insights on records and thresholds, targeting systems like those in Rochester.
HB1461: Sarah Burke Cohen, New Hampshire Municipal Association Oppose00:47:39.440 - 9:16:00 AM; NHMA opposes the bill but would not oppose an expedited DES review process for agreed intermunicipal extensions consistent with regional plans. They oppose DES overriding local decisions, citing high costs ($1.5M/mile), vague 'compelling necessity' standards, and potential forced agreements under RSA 53-A that could delay other projects.
HB1461: Representative Frock Information Only00:48:53.760 - 9:17:14 AM; Representative Frock asks if NHMA shares concerns that the bill prioritizes new extensions over maintenance, potentially delaying repairs if forced.
HB1461: Sarah Burke Cohen, New Hampshire Municipal Association Information Only00:50:23.680 - 9:18:44 AM; NHMA has concerns that forced extensions without mutual agreement could prioritize new projects and delay maintenance or upgrades.
HB1461: Representative Gilman Information Only00:50:23.680 - 9:18:44 AM; Representative Gilman asks where in the bill DES can force agreements between towns.
HB1461: Sarah Burke Cohen, New Hampshire Municipal Association Information Only00:51:29.920 - 9:19:50 AM; She references page two, lines 1-5, where the DES commissioner can require approval of a proposed extension notwithstanding local refusal if compelling necessity exists.
HB1461: Representative Guthrie Information Only00:51:29.920 - 9:19:50 AM; Representative Guthrie asks who in the community determines applying for sewer system changes, specifically which board makes the judgment.
HB1461: Sarah Burke Cohen, New Hampshire Municipal Association Information Only00:52:55.760 - 9:21:16 AM; For negotiated agreements under RSA 53-A, it's the governing body (e.g., board of selectmen). The bill gives DES authority to override if declined, not specifying who initiates but resting authority with DES for overrides.
HB1461: Representative Frock Information Only00:52:55.760 - 9:21:16 AM; Representative Frock asks if NHMA believes the legislative body, rather than the governing body, should decide on imposing additional taxes for costs not fully covered by grants.
HB1461: Sarah Burke Cohen, New Hampshire Municipal Association Information Only00:54:22.319 - 9:22:43 AM; NHMA would review amendment language to involve the legislative body in such decisions.
HB1461: Representative Gilman Information Only00:55:43.280 - 9:24:04 AM; Reports remote testimony: one in support, one opposed; on today's blue sheet, one in support.
HB1344: Representative Sweeney Support00:56:50.319 - 9:25:11 AM; The prime sponsor introduces the bill as allowing two or more contiguous municipalities, by vote of their legislative bodies, to voluntarily enter compacts for joint municipal services like public safety, water, sewer, etc. It emphasizes local control, efficiency, no mandates, limited powers, fiscal safeguards (no independent taxing, transparency under RSA 91-A), and easy withdrawal. It's not consolidation but a tool for cooperation, respecting local governance.
HB1344: Representative Colby Information Only00:59:46.880 - 9:28:07 AM; Representative Colby asks a technical question on how the bill works with existing water precincts or joint fire departments, specifically which governing body would create the new board.
HB1344: Representative Sweeney Information Only00:59:46.880 - 9:28:07 AM; The sponsor begins to respond that it would involve both, but the transcript cuts off.
HB1344: Representative Sweeney Support01:00:57.040 - 9:29:18 AM; Representative Sweeney explains the operation of the proposed intermunicipal compacts, drawing from his experience on the CART board which coordinates regional transport for senior citizens and bus services across towns like Derry, Londonderry, Chester, and Hampstead. He describes how representatives from each community would meet on a board to oversee the compact, but decisions require approval from governing and legislative bodies, including taxpayer votes for any tax impacts. He addresses questions on authority, budgeting, staff, and powers, emphasizing that all actions are contingent on local approvals to avoid unilateral decisions. He clarifies that the bill creates a new chapter 53-H for defined processes in areas like sewer, water, and transit, without affecting existing agreements under 53-A. He notes the compact's flexibility for housing and other services, and admits potential overlap with village districts under RSA 52-3 or 53-A, expressing willingness to revise if duplicative.
HB1273: Representative Chris Muns, Hampton Support01:15:53.040 - 9:44:14 AM; Representative Muns introduces HB 1273, highlighting the increasing frequency of flooding in New Hampshire due to climate change, with studies predicting heavier rainfall and sea level rise affecting coastal towns like Hampton, Seabrook, and Hampton Falls. He describes damages from recent floods in Hampton and the Monadnock region, noting impacts on smaller properties and potential $450 million in assessed value loss if sea levels rise. The bill expands RSA 79-E:4-a by removing 'coastal' from flood resilience zones to include inland areas, updates qualifying improvements, allows creation of a flood resilience incentive zone investment fund for below-market loans from public-private sources, enables a municipal flood resilience fee, and provides tax credits up to $1,000 for 5 years to offset improvement costs. He emphasizes public-private partnerships for resilience beyond public infrastructure.
HB1273: Representative Chris Muns, Hampton Information Only01:29:50.480 - 9:58:11 AM; The speaker discusses the distinction between the existing capital reserve fund and the proposed new revolving Fris Investment Fund. The revolving fund can accept municipal flood resilience fees, private contributions, and other public funds for flood resilience purposes, with a mechanism to replenish it.
HB1468: Representative Suzanne Vale, NH House District 3, Hillsborough County 6 Support01:33:28.719 - 10:01:49 AM; Representative Vale introduces HB 1468, which authorizes municipalities to include flood resilience planning in their master plans. She highlights the need for proactive planning to address repeated flooding events in areas like Antrim, Sullivan County, Monadnock region, Nelson, Stoddard, and Swanzey. She notes examples of severe flooding damaging roads and infrastructure. The bill avoids mandates and new spending, focusing on integrating flood planning into long-range municipal planning. She proposes an amendment to replace the entire bill with simpler language adding a local option section to RSA 674:3 without altering existing statutes or risking FEMA compatibility. This helps towns plan ahead post-emergency response.
HB1759: Representative Frock Support01:42:54.560 - 10:11:15 AM; Representative Frock introduces HB 1759 to make the disqualification vote for local land use board members binding rather than advisory when a conflict of interest exists. He explains the current RSA 673:14 inconsistency where a member must recuse if they have a direct personal or pecuniary interest, but an advisory vote may not compel recusal, leading to potential appeals and legal costs. The bill ensures impartial decisions by requiring recusal upon a majority vote, promoting fairness and public confidence without new costs. He addresses questions on voting procedures (the member does not vote, tie vote fails), lack of formal hearing (suggests discussion or opportunity to speak), due process concerns, and non-adversarial applications like self-initiated recusal queries.
HB1759: Representative Frock Support01:53:43.119 - 10:22:04 AM; Representative Frock explains that the bill addresses situations where a board member with relevant knowledge should bring it forth for a vote, emphasizing the need for proper procedures in planning and zoning boards. He notes that while there are state-provided rules of ethics, some individuals attempt to circumvent them, as he has observed in his own town.
HB1759: Representative Colby Information Only01:53:43.119 - 10:22:04 AM; Representative Colby asks if municipalities already have mechanisms for conflicts of interest through codes of ethics or similar documents.
HB1759: Representative Deborah Elward, Representative, Merrimack District 5 (Andover, Danbury, Salisbury, Webster) Support01:55:33.520 - 10:23:54 AM; Representative Elward testifies in support of the bill, sharing her experience living in a town with overt conflicts of interest and bias on boards, leading to unnecessary appeals. She highlights the lack of conflict of interest statutes for select boards and the challenges for applicants without resources to appeal. She acknowledges the need for due process and praises dedicated volunteers but calls for mechanisms to control runaway boards in small rural towns, citing examples from her district.
HB1759: Representative Gilman Information Only01:58:12.239 - 10:26:33 AM; Representative Gilman reports on the blue sheets, noting one supporter and initially zero opposition, later corrected to one opposed and one in favor, before closing the public hearing.
HB1497: Representative Deborah Elward, Merrimack District 5 Support01:59:42.159 - 10:28:03 AM; Representative Elward introduced HB 1497, explaining that it clarifies and standardizes the process for removing members of local land use boards, municipal commissions, city councils, committees, and select boards for cause. She noted that current statutes have inconsistent terminology and procedures leading to confusion and conflict. The bill ensures due process with notice, hearing, findings of fact, and a recorded vote, without expanding removal authority. It promotes transparency and fairness by placing removal authority with the governing body to avoid conflicts of interest and require decisions based on clear and convincing evidence. Elward shared personal experience where a select board politicized a misconduct allegation instead of enforcing the law. She addressed concerns that the bill might discourage qualified members, arguing it protects ethical service by addressing misconduct and reassuring members against retaliation. She mentioned needing an amendment for corrections and offered to answer questions.
HB1497: Representative Majori Information Only02:05:07.920 - 10:33:28 AM; Representative Majori asked for clarification on Roman numeral 13, which supersedes conflicting provisions of RSA 43, questioning what sections are affected and if RSA 43 remains intact.
HB1497: Representative Elward (response) Information Only02:05:07.920 - 10:33:28 AM; In response to Representative Majori, Elward explained that RSA 43 is antiquated, involving outdated methods like posting notices on horseback, and the bill clarifies that such provisions do not apply to the removal procedure.
HB1497: Representative Walker Information Only02:07:09.119 - 10:35:30 AM; Representative Walker expressed confusion about whether the bill changes the law or just restates it, noting that changes are usually in italics.
HB1497: Representative Elward (response) Information Only02:07:09.119 - 10:35:30 AM; Elward clarified that it is a replacement bill that repeals and reenacts the section, requiring some amendments.
HB1497: Representative Grund Information Only02:07:55.040 - 10:36:16 AM; Representative Grund asked about page two, line eight, regarding 'upon written petition by any person for removal,' questioning if it means anyone from anywhere or specifically from the town.
HB1497: Representative Elward (response) Information Only02:07:55.040 - 10:36:16 AM; Elward addressed concerns about the phrase 'any person,' noting the statute has been on the books for decades without issues. It allows for situations like whistleblowers relying on others to file petitions, ensuring legitimate claims are not barred by residency status.
HB1497: Representative Stavis Information Only02:09:45.520 - 10:38:06 AM; Representative Stavis asked about Roman numeral 11, confirming that failure to carry out duties like scheduling hearings and providing findings constitutes official oppression under RSA 643:1, applying to the body members, not the accused.
HB1497: Representative Elward (response) Information Only02:09:45.520 - 10:38:06 AM; Elward confirmed that it applies to the body members and they would be punishable if not followed in good faith.
HB1497: Representative Colby Information Only02:11:02.719 - 10:39:23 AM; Representative Colby asked if the bill allows a non-resident to file a petition to remove an elected planning board member, and sought confirmation on providing clear and convincing evidence of malfeasance, neglect, or inefficiency. He followed up by asking if she had spoken to the Secretary of State's office regarding elected officials.
HB1497: Representative Elward (response) Information Only02:11:02.719 - 10:39:23 AM; Elward confirmed that non-residents can file with evidence. She noted it's already in statute, with other removal provisions under RSA 42 for violations of oath of office.
HB1497: Representative Grund Information Only02:11:51.599 - 10:40:12 AM; Representative Grund questions the phrasing on page two, line eight, regarding 'removal of a land use board or other member,' suggesting it should be clarified to 'land use board member.'
HB1497: Committee Member (unidentified) Information Only02:12:30.000 - 10:40:51 AM; The committee member explains that 'member' is defined on page one, line 15, and references current law under Roman numeral two allowing removal by city council, select board, etc., for enumerated causes. Notes that the line needs reworking as it applies to non-land use board members.
HB1497: Representative Oulery, Vice Chair, Hudson Planning Board Support02:14:29.599 - 10:42:50 AM; Representative Oulery testifies in support, citing incidents in Hudson where elected planning board members engage in verbal assaults and disruptive behavior, leading to potential lawsuits costing taxpayers millions. He argues the bill provides a methodology for removal of elected members, protecting towns from disruption and frivolous suits. He notes issues occur in planning, zoning, and conservation boards, and emphasizes the need for clear standards like clear and convincing evidence from videotaped meetings. He urges the committee to refine the language to enable action against disruptive individuals.
HB1497: Representative Frock Information Only02:17:35.120 - 10:45:56 AM; Representative Frock questions whether the electoral process would address disruptions, given low attendance at meetings.
HB1497: Representative Oulery (response) Information Only02:18:30.000 - 10:46:51 AM; Oulery responds that meetings are not well attended but are broadcast on cable TV and watched by many. He notes public awareness through media and social platforms, and mentions a petition to switch from elected to appointed boards due to such issues, leaving the decision to voters.
HB1497: Representative Colby Information Only02:20:04.800 - 10:48:25 AM; Representative Colby questions why communities aren't applying existing RSA statutes for removal and what this bill changes.
HB1497: Representative Oulery (response) Information Only02:20:30.000 - 10:48:51 AM; Oulery explains that elected members are in a different category than appointed ones, requiring specific removal methodology to reverse the voters' choice. He compares it to removing non-attending executive board members and notes the bill provides a clear process with clear and convincing evidence standards, applicable to growing numbers of elected planning board members.
HB1497: Unidentified Representative (follow-up) Information Only02:22:33.840 - 10:50:54 AM; The representative follows up on whether the bill's provisions are already permissible under current law, questioning if passage would ensure compliance if existing laws are ignored.
HB1497: Representative Oulery (response) Information Only02:23:56.640 - 10:52:17 AM; Oulery notes that the bill includes penalties for administrative bodies not following the law, encouraging compliance by governing bodies. It provides cover from political accusations by requiring clear and convincing evidence, treating hearings as procedural steps.
HB1497: Representative Sabourin D. Schworer Support02:25:08.000 - 10:53:29 AM; Representative Schworer speaks in support of the bill and mentions an upcoming amendment related to excavations and driveways on page three, line 21, but is corrected that the hearing is only on HB 1497 and non-germane amendments require separate notice. She acknowledges her mistake as a freshman legislator and offers to return later.
HB1497: Ms. Bert Cohen Information Only02:26:23.760 - 10:54:44 AM; The chair recognizes Ms. Bert Cohen to speak next, but no testimony is provided in the transcript.
HB1497: Sarah Burke Cohen, New Hampshire Municipal Association Oppose02:27:16.000 - 10:55:37 AM; Sarah Burke Cohen testified in opposition to HB1497, arguing that the bill's broad definitions of inappropriate behavior could make it difficult to determine appropriate conduct and might allow removal even for legal actions like remote participation under RSA 91A. She highlighted that the bill gives anyone a cause of action for removal, potentially including out-of-state individuals upset with board decisions, leading to costly hearing processes. This could undermine the independence of land use boards in making quasi-judicial decisions without political pressure.
HB1246: Representative David Frack, Grafton 16, Town of Enfield Support02:33:44.080 - 11:02:05 AM; Representative David Frack introduced HB1246, a companion to last year's HB92, allowing individuals to serve on both planning boards and zoning boards of adjustment but requiring recusal from cases heard by both to avoid conflicts. He provided examples: a planning board member must recuse from a zoning board appeal of their own decision; a zoning board member cannot participate in a planning board review of the same project; and a planning board member cannot sit on a subsequent zoning variance for a conditioned subdivision. The bill addresses procedural issues in land use decisions, preserves impartiality, and reduces appeal risks without prohibiting dual service.
HB1802: Representative Elward Information Only02:39:28.080 - 11:07:49 AM; Representative Elward began introducing HB1802FN-A, noting it dovetails with other land use board matters and focuses on recognizing planning boards and zoning boards of adjustment, though the testimony snippet cuts off before full details.
HB1802: Representative Elward Support02:40:14.240 - 11:08:35 AM; Representative Elward continues explaining the importance of HB1802FN-A, emphasizing that land use board members act in a quasi-judicial capacity affecting property rights and need baseline training on statutes, procedures, and due process. The bill requires uniform, no-cost, web-based training, an open-book competency assessment, and certification by the Office of Planning and Development (OPD), using existing resources without creating new programs. It promotes transparency, accountability, and better decision-making while preserving local control and supporting rural board members who may lack experience. The bill ensures decisions are based on law and evidence, not misunderstandings or bias, and helps identify statutory authority. Elward addresses questions from committee members on certification requirements, potential impacts on small town participation, exclusion for appointed boards, OPD duties, bill errors, and comparisons to other governance roles, clarifying that the bill is non-punitive, requires only three attempts at certification, and aims to protect property rights without mandating passage.
HB1802: Representative Walker Information Only02:43:42.960 - 11:12:03 AM; Representative Walker questions whether requiring certification would limit the pool of people serving on small town boards and if the requirement should exclude appointed planning boards, noting self-policing in places like Rochester.
HB1802: Representative Elward (response) Support02:44:28.479 - 11:12:49 AM; Elward responds that certification discourages only those not committed, stresses necessity for mandating training to protect reputations, praises communities like Rochester for voluntary training but notes smaller rural areas lack such practices, and clarifies that only three attempts are needed, with non-certification falling under neglect of duty only if attempts are not made.
HB1802: Unnamed Representative Information Only02:44:28.479 - 11:12:49 AM; The unnamed representative follows up to confirm that individuals do not need to pass the test, just attempt it three times.
HB1802: Representative Gilman Information Only02:45:49.359 - 11:14:10 AM; Representative Gilman asks about Roman numeral six regarding OPD duties and the process for submitting letters of interest, noting current practice is to the governing body.
HB1802: Representative Elward (response) Support02:47:06.399 - 11:15:27 AM; Elward explains Roman six is independent of OPD requirements in Roman three, provides his own fiscal analysis correcting overstatements, and notes OPD's minimal duties include refreshing tests and posting names.
HB1802: Representative Davis Information Only02:48:04.240 - 11:16:25 AM; Representative Davis points out a reference error to non-existent paragraph 8 on page two, line 18, and questions a reference to dismissal under RSA 67:3 and 673:13.
HB1802: Representative Elward (response) Support02:48:04.240 - 11:16:25 AM; Elward acknowledges the error in the bill reference.
HB1802: Representative Majori Information Only02:48:04.240 - 11:16:25 AM; Representative Majori references HB1497 and asks if failure to certify would qualify as neglect of duty or cause for removal under that bill.
HB1802: Representative Elward (response) Support02:49:26.399 - 11:17:47 AM; Elward states the bill is not punitive, aims to educate for property rights protection, uses existing OPD infrastructure, and certification is voluntary but encouraged.
HB1802: Representative Gilman Information Only02:50:42.960 - 11:19:03 AM; Representative Gilman asks why testing is required only for land use boards and not other governance areas, per an online question.
HB1802: Representative Elward (response) Support02:51:30.080 - 11:19:51 AM; Elward suggests it could be addressed in other bills.
HB1802: Representative Grunt Information Only02:51:30.080 - 11:19:51 AM; Representative Grunt expresses concern that using 'shall' implies mandatory certification, potentially leading to negligence claims if HB1497 passes.
HB1802: Representative Elward (response) Support02:52:32.800 - 11:20:53 AM; Elward clarifies the bill uses 'shall' for taking the test, not obtaining the certificate, and it's voluntary.
HB1802: Representative Colby Information Only02:52:32.800 - 11:20:53 AM; Representative Colby asks for examples of other municipal roles requiring certification and compares to legislative training.
HB1802: Representative Elward (response) Support02:53:56.800 - 11:22:17 AM; Elward notes no such requirements exist, highlights issues in rural towns lacking self-education, and agrees legislative training could be mandated separately. He provides evidence of a planning board chair improperly inserting into an appeal process, leading to a malfeasance allegation.
HB1802: Representative Savas Information Only02:53:56.800 - 11:22:17 AM; Representative Savas asks for documentary evidence prompting the bill, questioning claims that the system is a mess.
HB1802: Representative Gilman Information Only02:55:24.880 - 11:23:45 AM; Representative Gilman asks the sponsor to explain the enforcement provisions on line 14 of the bill, which aim to promote transparency and accountability through public reporting of training completion and clear enforcement for non-compliance.
HB1802: Sponsor (Unnamed) Information Only02:56:48.640 - 11:25:09 AM; The sponsor explains that the bill references neglect of duty under 673:13 if three attempts to complete training are not made. Currently, the statute motivates attempts but does not require certification. Public reporting at hearings creates peer pressure to obtain certification, allowing the public and applicants to know who is certified.
HB1802: Representative Colby Information Only02:57:35.120 - 11:25:56 AM; Representative Colby asks how the 60-day training requirement and annual renewal would apply to existing board members upon the bill's passage—whether they get 60 days from passage or follow the annual cycle. The sponsor notes that prior voluntary certificates remain valid, but the specific provision may have been removed by OS.
HB1802: Representative Dolan Information Only02:58:26.000 - 11:26:47 AM; Representative Dolan suggests restricting voting rights until training is complete as a remedy. The sponsor opposes this as too punitive, potentially unconstitutional, and disruptive to elected authority, especially distinguishing between alternate and elected members.
HB1802: Representative David Frock, Grafton 16, Chair of Enfield Planning Board Support03:00:31.040 - 11:28:52 AM; Representative Frock, with extensive experience chairing planning boards in Enfield, NH and Vermont, supports the bill as a motivational step beyond the current basic 100-page open-book training manual. He notes it takes new members about a year to get up to speed without prior experience. The bill promotes certification, reduces emotional decision-making, and ensures adherence to procedures and ordinances, helping local land use boards handle strange situations effectively.
HB1802: Jordan Olery, Vice Chair, Hudson Planning Board Support03:06:01.120 - 11:34:22 AM; Jordan Olery testified about the importance of training for planning and zoning board members, drawing from Hudson's history as the most sued town due to ignorance and personal preferences overriding law. He emphasized that trained members avoid costly lawsuits and ensure developments follow minimum requirements set by courts if errors occur. He noted that planning and zoning boards operate quasi-judicially, requiring knowledge of rules for smooth processes. Olery mentioned existing training from the New Hampshire Municipal Association and warned that without mandatory training, lawsuits will increase in a litigious society.
HB1802: Representative Grunt Information Only03:09:32.960 - 11:37:53 AM; Representative Grunt asked if failing to obtain or pass the certification test constitutes negligence, to which Olery responded yes, suggesting it might stem from computer literacy issues or personal agendas.
HB1802: Representative Gilman Information Only03:10:24.399 - 11:38:45 AM; Representative Gilman inquired why the bill targets only planning and zoning boards but not historic district commissions, which have less training materials. Olery explained that historic commissions administer existing ordinances created through planning or zoning processes, making them less regulatory in the same way.
HB1802: Chris Norwood, New Hampshire Association of Realtors Support03:12:02.880 - 11:40:23 AM; Chris Norwood strongly supported the bill, highlighting the dedication of board members despite late meetings and the need for a basic training floor to prevent misinterpretations leading to lawsuits. He cited recent cases: Shadex vs. Francestown (2021) where the Housing Appeals Board ruled against the town for relying on ordinance spirit over specifics; a Supreme Court case in Franklin where denial based on aesthetics (not in ordinance) cost the town legally; and Raymond vs. Plaistow (2023) where the Supreme Court ruled boards cannot deny permits based on distrust of applicants. Norwood argued the bill could mitigate such issues and noted the Housing Appeals Board as a cost-effective alternative to higher courts.
HB1802: Representative Majori Information Only03:16:17.520 - 11:44:38 AM; Representative Majori asked if the bill's passage would eliminate the need for the Housing Appeals Board. Norwood responded that while it addresses some misapplications, not all cases are due to board errors, and the board handles other statutory issues more affordably than superior or supreme courts.
HB1802: Representative Gilman Information Only03:17:17.040 - 11:45:38 AM; Representative Gilman reported on the blue sheets for HB1802, noting one for and one against in the room, later corrected to two opposed and two in support including remote testimony, before closing the public hearing.
HB1479: Stephanie Grund Information Only03:19:30.960 - 11:47:51 AM; Introduces HB1479FN, explaining that the bill repeals the authority for municipalities to impose and collect motor vehicle registration permit fees.
HB1479: Joan Dargy, Town Clerk, Milford, on behalf of New Hampshire City and Town Clerks Oppose03:20:33.760 - 11:48:54 AM; Expresses confusion about the bill's scope regarding waste management fees and excise taxes, but opposes eliminating motor vehicle registration permit fees, noting it would result in a $4 million revenue loss for Milford, shifting the burden to property taxpayers.
HB1690: Representative Karazinski Oppose05:32:42.798 - 2:01:03 PM; Moves for inexpedient to legislate, arguing that impact fees for capital projects should not extend to vehicles and equipment. Notes that current law limits impact fees to long-lifespan capital items like those bonded over 20 years, and the bill's vague language on 'safety equipment' including but not limited to fleet items contradicts existing statutes.
HB1461: Representative Stavis Oppose05:37:37.440 - 2:05:58 PM; Moves for inexpedient to legislate, acknowledging the bill's good policy for addressing housing shortages but citing complexity in multi-municipal sewage systems and lack of time this session to refine it. Encourages refiling in the next biennium.
HB1461: Representative Grund Information Only05:39:48.638 - 2:08:09 PM; Thanks Representative Stavis, emphasizes the bill's importance for housing, growth, and business in towns like hers.
HB1461: Unidentified Representative (co-sponsor) Information Only05:39:48.638 - 2:08:09 PM; Echoes support for the bill's importance but notes concerns from testimony requiring revisions, encourages sponsor to rework nebulous sections based on committee feedback for next session.
HB1461: Representative Stavis Information Only05:41:08.400 - 2:09:29 PM; Suggests sponsor consult municipalities like Lebanon and Enfield already implementing such systems to understand intricacies.
HB1344: Representative Colby Oppose05:43:21.280 - 2:11:42 PM; Moves for inexpedient to legislate due to concerns about adding another layer of government; notes existing statutes already enable intermunicipal agreements, making the bill unnecessary.
HB1344: Clerk and Committee Members Vote05:45:11.360 - 2:13:32 PM; The committee conducted a roll call vote on the motion for inexpedient to legislate on HB1344. All members voted yes, resulting in an 18-0 vote in favor.
HB1468: Representative Stavis Support05:46:06.160 - 2:14:27 PM; Moved ought to pass on HB1468, emphasizing that adding flood resilience planning and the use of planning grants to a municipality's master plan is a good and timely idea, based on the original bill, not the amendment.
HB1468: Clerk and Committee Members Vote05:47:27.680 - 2:15:48 PM; The committee conducted a roll call vote on the motion for ought to pass on HB1468. All members voted yes, resulting in an 18-0 vote in favor.
HB1497: Representative McDonald Oppose05:49:34.878 - 2:17:55 PM; Moved inexpedient to legislate (ITL) on HB1497, noting that while appreciating the sponsor's efforts, the bill expands beyond removal and appointment of elected local land use board members, affecting various officials and needing more focus and work.
HB1497: Representative Elward Information Only05:50:47.760 - 2:19:08 PM; Acknowledged the need for more work on the bill and agreed to rework it.
HB1497: Chair Information Only05:50:47.760 - 2:19:08 PM; Encouraged the sponsor to rework the bill and file it in the future.
HB1497: Clerk and Committee Members Vote05:52:13.040 - 2:20:34 PM; The committee conducted a roll call vote on the motion for inexpedient to legislate on HB1497. All members voted yes, resulting in an 18-0 vote in favor.
HB1246: Representative Stavis Support05:53:13.680 - 2:21:34 PM; Moved ought to pass on HB1246, stating that having served on a planning board for many years, the bill adds a guardrail to ensure no conflicts of interest in the planning process.
HB1246: Representative Gilman Support05:54:32.718 - 2:22:53 PM; Supported the bill as it clarifies good practices for zoning and planning boards, making explicit what active boards may already do.
HB1246: Clerk and Committee Members Vote05:55:39.200 - 2:24:00 PM; The committee conducted a roll call vote on the motion for ought to pass on HB1246. All members voted yes, resulting in an 18-0 vote in favor.
HB1802: Representative Majori Oppose05:57:16.878 - 2:25:37 PM; Moved inexpedient to legislate (ITL) on HB1802-FN-A, acknowledging the value of available training for land use board members but raising concerns about implementation, such as the requirement for three attempts at certification within 60 days, which could stigmatize members. Emphasized that elected members should serve if they engage with training, and the bill does not effectively meet its goals.
HB1802: Representative Elward Support05:59:22.400 - 2:27:43 PM; Thanked the committee for interest and comments, noted that testimony confirmed the real problem with land use outcomes, and plans to continue working on the bill.
HB1802: Representative Colby Information Only05:59:22.400 - 2:27:43 PM; Recognized and thanked the prime sponsor for listening to constituents and making a valiant effort to be a good representative.
HB1802: Representative Guthrie Oppose06:00:44.638 - 2:29:05 PM; Commented on experience as an ex officio planning board member, noting that dedicated volunteers are willing to get educated, and towns are well-served by boards with staff support like counsel and engineers.
HB1802: Unidentified Representative Oppose06:01:42.000 - 2:30:03 PM; Respected the sponsor's diligence but expressed concern that no other municipal boards in New Hampshire require training and certification, leading to support for ITL.
HB1802: Representative Elward Support06:01:42.000 - 2:30:03 PM; Appreciated feedback, explaining that land use boards act in a quasi-judicial capacity like a court, unlike other municipal boards.
HB1802: Committee Chair Information Only06:03:10.400 - 2:31:31 PM; The committee proceeds to vote on the motion for inexpedient to legislate (ITL) on HB1802-FN-A after concluding discussion.
HB1479: Representative Dolan Oppose06:04:43.200 - 2:33:04 PM; The language in the bill was confusing and unclear, and the sponsor failed to appear before the committee, leaving clarifying information unavailable.
HB1479: Committee Chair Information Only06:05:56.558 - 2:34:17 PM; The committee votes unanimously to recommend inexpedient to legislate on HB1479-FN, noting the fiscal note but allowing it on the consent calendar.
HB1242: Representative Majori Oppose06:08:11.680 - 2:36:32 PM; The bill has deficiencies and requires an amendment that is not yet available. Sponsors and stakeholders agree to ITL and plan to refile or introduce the language later.
HB1242: Committee Member Oppose06:09:16.558 - 2:37:37 PM; There are technical issues with the bill needing significant work, and the prime sponsor is not responding. Supports ITL and encourages fixes for refiling next term.
HB1242: Committee Chair Information Only06:10:31.680 - 2:38:52 PM; The committee votes unanimously to recommend inexpedient to legislate on HB1242.
HB1044 2026-000069h: Committee Chair Support06:12:36.240 - 2:40:57 PM; Introduces and explains amendment 2026-000069h, which clarifies the bill's impact on RSA sections, addresses confusion from varying county term lengths (two and four years), and ensures vacancies are filled by district representatives. The amendment aligns with the sponsor's intent and fixes unclear wording.
HB1044 2026-000069h: Committee Chair Information Only06:16:16.718 - 2:44:37 PM; The committee votes unanimously to accept the amendment 2026-000069h.
HB1044 2026-000069h: Committee Member Support06:17:45.520 - 2:46:06 PM; Makes motion for ought to pass as amended (OTPA) and states that the amendment makes the bill much clearer.
HB1044 2026-000069h: Committee Chair Support06:17:45.520 - 2:46:06 PM; The amendment supports changes from a previous bill by the prime sponsor.
HB1044 2026-000069h: Committee Chair Information Only06:19:08.638 - 2:47:29 PM; The committee votes unanimously for OTPA on HB1044 with amendment.
HB1296 2026-0152h: Representative Majori Support06:20:20.480 - 2:48:41 PM; Moves to accept amendment 2026-0152h, which adds one word 'only' to clarify that towns or cities previously adopting the provisions are not required to readopt following updated threshold amounts, applying only to increases not decreases. Moves for OTPA, noting the language unchanged since 2003, importance for aging population, and allowing seniors to age in place with updated income limits.
HB1296 2026-0152h: Committee Chair Information Only06:21:26.638 - 2:49:47 PM; The committee votes unanimously to accept amendment 2026-0152h.
HB1296 2026-0152h: Committee Member Support06:23:52.638 - 2:52:13 PM; Concurs with Representative Majori, notes dollar amounts unchanged for 30 years since 1996 enactment, updates for inflation are overdue, and supports the motion.
HB1296 2026-0152h: Representative [Unnamed] Support06:25:46.080 - 2:54:07 PM; The representative makes a personal comment noting that their town recently increased the exemption amount as proposed in the bill and expresses gladness for the bill, hoping for additional increases in the future.
HB1278: Representative German Oppose06:28:15.360 - 2:56:36 PM; Moves for inexpedient to legislate (ITL), arguing that the legislature cannot create opt-outs every time a new bill passes, as it contradicts previous municipal votes.
HB1278: Representative Grund Support06:29:32.320 - 2:57:53 PM; Opposes the ITL motion, highlighting the timing issue for SB2 towns: public hearings in January, deliberatives in February, voting in March, but the law change was announced February 27th, leaving no time to inform voters about the shift to a three-fifths requirement.
HB1278: Unnamed Representative Oppose06:30:25.520 - 2:58:46 PM; Agrees with the motion for ITL, stating it's improper to respond to a passed bill one dislikes; finds the bill's language vague, onerous, confusing, and chaotic, making it not good law.
HB1383: Representative Frans Oppose06:32:45.680 - 3:01:06 PM; Moves for ITL, feeling the bill is unnecessary; the only testimony cited counting written ballots at town meetings as too time-consuming, which is not sufficient reason for new law on this important issue, advocating for time to think.
HB1383: Unnamed Representative Information Only06:33:51.840 - 3:02:12 PM; Notes that law changes prompt multiple responsive bills to last year's tax cap law; SB2 (official ballot referendum) enacted in 1995 has been amended 13 times without litanies of bills each time. The bill strikes ballot procedures for overrides; emphasizes maintaining paper secret ballots for accurate vote calculation in traditional town meetings, as discussed by the sponsor, to ensure threshold achievement.
HB1227: Representative Walker Oppose06:39:10.798 - 3:07:31 PM; Moves for ITL, stating it aligns with other tax cap bills and involves confusing language that is unnecessary.
HB1227: Unnamed Representative Oppose06:40:34.320 - 3:08:55 PM; Adds that the bill manipulates prior year's spending to accommodate bond payments (small first-year interest, larger subsequent principal and interest), which contradicts the tax cap's purpose; understands payment structures but believes hard spending decisions are required, ultimately up to the legislative body.
HB1227: Representative Majori Oppose06:41:23.840 - 3:09:44 PM; Representative Majori opposes the motion to find the bill inexpedient to legislate (ITL). He argues that the budget process must be transparent and that in the first year of bond payments, municipalities cannot accurately calculate the full cost against the tax cap because interest rates may not be locked in. He supports including the bond payments in the calculation starting in year two, when repayments begin, to provide specificity that taxpayers deserve. He will support an Ought to Pass (OTP) recommendation if possible.
HB1227: Committee Chair Information Only06:42:28.798 - 3:10:49 PM; The Chair announces the vote on the motion for inexpedient to legislate (ITL) on HB 1227, explains the voting procedure, and calls for the roll call.
HB1227: Clerk Information Only06:43:25.520 - 3:11:46 PM; The Clerk calls the roll and records the votes: Yes votes from Vice Chairman McDonald, Representative Guthrie, Dolan, Elward, Fron, Kerazinski, Murphy, Walker, Gerard, and the Chair (11 yes); No votes from Representatives Stavis, Gilman, Majori, Frock, Colby, German, and Grunt (7 no). The motion passes 11-7, recommending ITL for HB 1227.
HB1227: Committee Chair Information Only06:44:29.280 - 3:12:50 PM; The Chair announces the motion passes 11-7, states the committee recommendation is inexpedient to legislate on HB 1227 to go on the regular calendar, volunteers to write the majority report, assigns the minority report to Representative Majori, and closes the executive session on HB 1227. She notes that all previously heard bills have been exeunted except two, announces the next meeting on Friday, January 23rd at 9:00 a.m., reminds members to submit reports by midnight Sunday, January 25th, thanks the committee, and adjourns the meeting.
HB1227: Representative Majori Information Only06:44:29.280 - 3:12:50 PM; Representative Majori volunteers to write the minority report.
HB1227: Unnamed Speaker Information Only06:45:54.558 - 3:14:15 PM; The speaker confirms they will handle the reports as assigned.

Pauer, Diane(Chairman)(R)[A]2025	Bjelobrk, Marie Louise(Clerk)(R)[B+]2025	MacDonald, John(V Chairman)(R)[B+]2025
Germana, Dylan(D)[D-]2025	Fracht, David(D)[D-]2025	Guthrie, Joseph(R)[C]2025
Gilman, Julie(D)[D-]2025	Grund, Stephanie(D)[F]2025	Stavis, Laurel(D)[CT]2025
Karasinski, Sly(R)[B]2025	Maggiore, Jim(D)[CT]2025	Dolan, Tom(R)[B]2025
Aylward, Deborah(R)[B+]2025	Walker, David(R)[B+]2025	Colby, Eleana (D)[F]2025
Girard, Dale(D)[C-]2025	Franz, Linda(R)[B]2025	Murphy, Denis(R)[B+]2025