Committee Summary for House Finance Division II (03/19/2025)

Bill/Time	Type	Title	Sponsor
HB115 114h 00:03:58.720 - 9:02:49 AM	General Working Session	(New Title) making temporary appropriations for the expenses and encumbrances of the state of New Hampshire.	McDonnell, Valerie(R)[B+]2025
HB2 114h 00:46:46.400 - 9:45:37 AM	General Working Session	relative to state fees, funds, revenues, and expenditures.	Weyler, Kenneth(R)[A-]2025
HB2 114h 02:09:03.440 - 11:07:54 AM	General Working Session	relative to state fees, funds, revenues, and expenditures.	Weyler, Kenneth(R)[A-]2025

HB115 114h: Chair Information Only00:03:58.720 - 9:02:49 AM; The Chair opened the Division 2 Finance Committee work session at 10:03 AM and introduced the topic of House Bill HB115.
HB115 114h: Representative Murray Information Only00:06:03.680 - 9:04:54 AM; Representative Murray introduced an amendment, 114h, to HB115. The amendment seeks to incorporate language from the governor's HB2 into HB115, focusing on university eligibility and maintaining the 350% federal poverty rate. It requires full-time enrolled students to have attended a charter or public school in grades K-12 the preceding year before being eligible for the voucher system. Murray emphasized the importance of public input and noted significant opposition to the expansion of the voucher system, mentioning public meetings and numerous emails received. Murray also listed several communities that have voted against expanding the voucher system, including Bradford, Grantham, Mount Vernon, Newbury, Newport, New Boston, New London, Salisbury, Sunapee, and Weare, highlighting a strong public opposition. Additionally, Murray referenced a letter from former Finance Chair Neil Kirk opposing the expansion of education freedom accounts, arguing that it is not the right time due to budget constraints.
HB115 114h: Representative Papich Oppose00:11:06.560 - 9:09:57 AM; Representative Papich expressed appreciation for the amendment's intent but noted that the committee should not consider policy changes as per the house's prior decisions. He mentioned that while he respects the beliefs of amendment supporters, he would not support the amendment due to its policy implications rather than fiscal adjustments.
HB115 114h: Representative Haen Phillips Support00:12:11.720 - 9:11:02 AM; Representative Haen Phillips discussed the fiscal responsibility of considering the amendment in the context of New Hampshire's budget crisis. He argued for the amendment as a way to control the potential expansion of the voucher program, aligning with the preferences of his constituents and the governor's wishes. He cautioned against the financial risks of universal vouchers, referencing the Arizona model, and urged a more cautious approach.
HB115 114h: Representative Murray Oppose00:15:33.120 - 9:14:24 AM; Representative Murray questioned the justification for cutting other programs while expanding the voucher program. He emphasized the need for a compromise and expressed concerns about the financial implications of the expansion, particularly in light of public support and opposition to vouchers.
HB115 114h: Representative Luno Oppose00:16:47.319 - 9:15:38 AM; Representative Luno discussed the history and assumptions of the EFA program, highlighting the low take-up rate among public school students and the high take-up rate among those not attending public schools. He raised concerns about the state's financial exposure and the need for accurate data to understand the program's impact on the state's budget, referencing the Arizona experience as a cautionary tale.
HB115 114h: Representative Papovich Oppose00:25:24.080 - 9:24:15 AM; Representative Papovich argued against restricting access to EFAs based on income, comparing it to public school enrollment. He emphasized the state's obligation to provide adequate education opportunities to all children, regardless of their parents' income, and criticized the inconsistency in educational funding policies.
HB115 114h: Representative Murray Oppose00:27:40.200 - 9:26:31 AM; Representative Murray reiterated the need for compromise and highlighted the significant budget gap, suggesting that maintaining the current EFA program without expansion was a reasonable approach given the financial climate and public sentiment against vouchers.
HB115 114h: Representative Clerk Information Only00:29:35.360 - 9:28:26 AM; Representative Clerk corrected misinformation about a letter from Granite State Taxpayers, clarifying that it was not approved by the board and that Representative Kirk, who issued the letter, had resigned. He emphasized the importance of accurate representation of organizational positions.
HB115 114h: Representative Bean Information Only00:30:40.559 - 9:29:31 AM; Representative Bean moved to accept Amendment 114h to HB115, ensuring proper procedural steps were followed for the vote on the amendment and the underlying bill.
HB115 114h: Representative Wer Support00:34:18.639 - 9:33:09 AM; Representative Wer supported HB115 without the amendment, citing an analysis from the Josiah Bartlet Center that suggested the Education Freedom Accounts save money. He argued that parents using EFAs are still contributing through property taxes and taking on additional responsibilities, justifying the program's continuation without changes.
HB115 114h: Representative Papovich Oppose00:35:55.119 - 9:34:46 AM; Representative Papovich refuted the notion of educational funding as a giveaway, emphasizing that all children are entitled to adequate education support. He criticized the fiscal responsibility claims of Republican-led budgets, suggesting a comparative analysis with minority-led budgets would reveal different levels of fiscal responsibility.
HB115 114h: Representative Luno Oppose00:37:01.920 - 9:35:52 AM; Representative Luno challenged the Josiah Bartlet Center's analysis, pointing out the significant increase in EFA program costs when income eligibility was expanded. He argued that the assumptions used in the analysis were flawed, especially regarding take-up rates among different student groups, and stressed the need for accurate financial projections to manage the state's budget effectively.
HB2 114h: Mark Kavanaugh, Deputy Counsel and Compliance Officer, New Hampshire Retirement System Information Only00:46:46.400 - 9:45:37 AM; Mark Kavanaugh provided detailed information about the retirement system, specifically addressing sections 150 and 152 of House Bill 2. He explained that these sections aim to address recruitment and retention issues for positions that are typically filled by former group two members, such as firefighters and police officers, but do not qualify as group two due to their job descriptions. He clarified that if a retiree returns to a full-time position, their pension stops, and they are re-enrolled in the retirement system, either as group one or group two, depending on the position. He also discussed the differences in benefits between group one and group two, including the spousal survivor annuity. Kavanaugh addressed concerns about potential double dipping, explaining that full-time positions require pension cessation upon re-employment, and only certain exempt positions allow for simultaneous pension collection and employment.
HB2 114h: Rick Foro, Director of Communications and Legislative Affairs, New Hampshire Retirement System Information Only00:46:46.400 - 9:45:37 AM; Rick Foro supported Mark Kavanaugh's testimony by providing further clarification on the retirement system's rules and policies. He explained the concept of a 'split benefit' where service in both group one and group two is calculated separately but combined into one pension. He also discussed the policy behind exempt positions, which are typically high-level, fixed-term appointments that allow for pension collection while employed, due to recruitment needs for experienced individuals. Foro addressed the possibility of making the discussed positions exempt, noting it would require legislative action and could impact recruitment and contributions to the retirement system.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:15:10.440 - 10:14:01 AM; The speaker referred to an amendment discussed the previous day and noted new amendments available for consideration today. They mentioned moving to page 25 of House Bill 2, sections 21 and 22, discussing the Education Freedom Account expansion and the governor's proposal. They also referenced Representative Earth's amendment 1075, which would overwrite the governor's proposal with the House's EFA expansion policy.
HB2 114h: Ros Papovich Information Only01:16:29.520 - 10:15:20 AM; Ros Papovich moved to adopt amendment 1075h to HB2, which was seconded by Representative Bean. A show of hands vote was suggested and agreed upon, with the motion passing.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:17:19.080 - 10:16:10 AM; The speaker discussed the next amendment on page eight of the amendment packet, amendment number 113h, which pertains to section 51 of HB2. This amendment would reconsider a previously adopted amendment and incorporate new sections as discussed the previous day. A motion to reconsider the previous vote on amendment 0813 and replace it with 113h was made and seconded, passing unanimously.
HB2 114h: Phillips Information Only01:19:14.440 - 10:18:05 AM; Phillips moved to adopt amendment 113h to HB2, which was seconded by Hacken. The motion passed unanimously.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:20:09.000 - 10:19:00 AM; The speaker discussed sections 145 and 146 on page 63 of HB2, which relate to the general fund lapse of fire standards into the Fire Fund. They explained that the governor's budget includes $4 million in fiscal year 26 to support the fire fund, and the sections ensure any unspent amount lapses to the fire fund instead of the general fund. A motion to adopt this language was made and seconded, passing unanimously.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:22:04.360 - 10:20:55 AM; The speaker discussed section 148 on page 63 of HB2, regarding federal agents' access to motor vehicle records. A motion to adopt this section was made and seconded, passing unanimously.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:23:41.560 - 10:22:32 AM; The speaker discussed section 149 related to the e911 fund, expressing a need for more time to gather information from the Department of Safety. They suggested removing this section from HB2 and amending HB1 to move the line item back into the operational budget, which typically includes a mix of general and highway funds. They noted the long-standing practice of funding these costs with the e911 fund and the potential need for an alternate funding source if the section were not adopted. A suggestion was made to wait until Friday for more data before deciding.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:26:35.280 - 10:25:26 AM; The speaker mentioned new amendments related to House Bill 675 and House Bill 649, which were available in the packet for consideration. They also noted the presence of the Department of Education to answer questions about HB2 and other requests.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:27:33.239 - 10:26:24 AM; The speaker clarified that amendment number 1082 includes the language from House Bill 675 to be put into HB2, related to local budget caps. A motion to adopt this amendment was suggested, but the speaker wanted to proceed one at a time to avoid confusion.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:28:21.920 - 10:27:12 AM; The speaker moved to adopt amendment 1082h to HB2, which was on page 12 of the packet.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:28:21.920 - 10:27:12 AM; The speaker was finishing their testimony related to the general topic of retirement and amendment 114h to HB2. The summary of their testimony is not provided in the transcript snippet.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:29:11.440 - 10:28:02 AM; A roll call vote was conducted on an unspecified motion, resulting in a 5 to 3 vote. The motion was approved.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:30:02.880 - 10:28:53 AM; A motion was made to adopt amendment 1092h to HB2, related to passenger vehicle inspection repeal. The amendment was discussed and confirmed to be already done.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:30:54.360 - 10:29:45 AM; The committee confirmed the bill number as HB649, related to passenger vehicle inspection repeal, and discussed amendment 1092h, which was already voted on.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:31:52.199 - 10:30:43 AM; The committee took a roll call vote on amendment 1092h, resulting in a 5 to 3 approval. The committee reviewed documents related to House Bill 2 draft language.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:33:52.719 - 10:32:43 AM; The committee discussed the availability of a document related to House Bill 2 on the Division 2 website and prepared for a presentation by Caitlyn Davis from the department.
HB2 114h: Caitlyn Davis Information Only01:35:35.480 - 10:34:26 AM; Caitlyn Davis explained the funding and assessment changes for chartered public schools, specifically sections 121 and 122 of House Bill 2. She clarified that the changes were technical and would not incur additional costs.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:43:15.280 - 10:42:06 AM; The committee discussed the document related to House Bill 2 and prepared to vote on sections 121 and 122, which were unanimously passed.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:44:11.560 - 10:43:02 AM; The committee reviewed a draft language packet from the Department of Education, discussing potential requests related to assessments. The department requested funding for a new assessment in high school.
HB2 114h: Caitlyn Davis Information Only01:45:04.080 - 10:43:55 AM; Caitlyn Davis presented the department's request for $1.5 million to implement an additional assessment in high school, specifically the PSAT, to measure growth and performance.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:48:10.320 - 10:47:01 AM; The committee discussed the department's request for funding and the implications of the proposed assessments. They debated the use of specific vendors in law and the benefits of using the SAT and PSAT.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:50:26.920 - 10:49:17 AM; The committee continued discussing the department's request, considering the potential changes to the law regarding the use of specific vendors for assessments. They explored the benefits and drawbacks of the proposed changes.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:51:30.400 - 10:50:21 AM; The committee debated the funding for the proposed 10th grade assessment and whether to change the law to require the use of specific vendors like the SAT and PSAT. They discussed the implications of such a change.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:52:47.079 - 10:51:38 AM; The committee discussed the either-or nature of the proposed amendments and the need for funding to implement the 10th grade assessment. They considered the impact of not funding the assessment.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:53:41.159 - 10:52:32 AM; The committee discussed the department's request and the potential for drafting amendments. They considered the implications of not funding the proposed assessment and the need for clarity in the law.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:54:46.760 - 10:53:37 AM; The committee discussed alternative assessment options and the use of the SAT and PSAT. They debated the importance of using nationally norm-referenced tests for comparison purposes.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:55:15.840 - 10:54:06 AM; The committee decided to delay voting on the funding for the proposed assessment until a later date. They discussed the need for clarity in the law and the potential for drafting amendments.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:56:17.079 - 10:55:08 AM; The committee discussed the process for drafting amendments and the need for members to decide on supporting the proposed changes. They considered the implications of the department's requests.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:57:07.679 - 10:55:58 AM; The committee debated the funding for the proposed assessment and the need for drafting amendments. They considered the implications of not funding the assessment and the potential for future legislative changes.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:58:08.480 - 10:56:59 AM; The committee discussed the need for drafting both amendments related to the proposed assessment, with one requiring funding and the other not. They considered the implications of the department's requests.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:59:13.760 - 10:58:04 AM; The committee debated the use of specific vendors in law and the benefits of using the SAT and PSAT. They considered the implications of the proposed changes and the need for clarity in the law.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only02:00:14.159 - 10:59:05 AM; The committee discussed the need for flexibility in the law regarding the use of assessment vendors. They considered the implications of the proposed changes and the potential for future legislative updates.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only02:01:12.119 - 11:00:03 AM; The committee debated the value of using nationally norm-referenced tests and the need for clarity in the law. They considered the implications of the proposed changes and the potential for future legislative updates.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only02:02:19.679 - 11:01:10 AM; The committee discussed the need for descriptive language in the amendments and the potential for future legislative changes. They considered the implications of the proposed changes and the need for clarity in the law.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only02:03:36.360 - 11:02:27 AM; The committee debated the use of specific vendors in law and the need for flexibility. They considered the implications of the proposed changes and the potential for future legislative updates.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only02:04:37.480 - 11:03:28 AM; The committee discussed the need for descriptive language in the amendments and the potential for future legislative changes. They considered the implications of the proposed changes and the need for clarity in the law.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only02:05:46.880 - 11:04:37 AM; The committee decided to draft the amendments and continue the discussion after lunch. They considered the implications of the proposed changes and the need for clarity in the law.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only02:07:09.280 - 11:06:00 AM; The committee discussed the need for descriptive language in the amendments and the potential for future legislative changes. They considered the implications of the proposed changes and the need for clarity in the law.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only02:08:03.840 - 11:06:54 AM; The committee decided to draft the amendments and continue the discussion after lunch. They considered the implications of the proposed changes and the need for clarity in the law.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only02:09:03.440 - 11:07:54 AM; The committee discussed the need for descriptive language in the amendments and the potential for future legislative changes. They considered the implications of the proposed changes and the need for clarity in the law.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only02:09:03.440 - 11:07:54 AM; The speaker was discussing the continuation of a general working session on retirement and bill number HB2 with amendment number 114h. The discussion was ongoing, and the speaker was finishing their remarks.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:03:16.760 - 12:02:07 PM; The speaker announced the resumption of the HB2 Division 2 Finance work session. They mentioned that the committee had already voted on House Bill 115 and House Bill 2 related to EFA eligibility definition. The Department of Education had submitted additional prioritized needs in their agency budget request. The speaker then corrected themselves about the page number of the document, referring to page 12 and then page 13, which contained technical corrections related to special education aid. They confirmed that no further action was needed on the EFA discussion based on the morning's actions.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:04:36.160 - 12:03:27 PM; The speaker mentioned that the next page (page 13) of the document was related to special education aid, commonly known as catastrophic aid. They recommended holding off on this topic because the committee had not yet decided on what to do with catastrophic aid, as there was a retained bill pending. The Department proposed technical corrections that had no cost impact relative to current law, including changes to clarify that the State Board of Education does not make payments or interact directly with catastrophic aid, suggesting recodification of education law.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:06:36.319 - 12:05:27 PM; The speaker explained the proposed changes to the catastrophic aid calculation. Currently, the Department uses an estimated cost per pupil, but they proposed using the actual cost per pupil instead, citing that the estimated cost per pupil calculation is arbitrary and not used elsewhere in law. This change would be based on the actual cost available in December of the school year.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:07:37.040 - 12:06:28 PM; The speaker clarified the use of 'most current average expenditure' versus 'actual cost per pupil.' They explained that the most current cost per pupil would be used, which would technically be the previous year's cost per pupil, as the actual cost for the current year wouldn't be available until after the year ends.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:08:40.160 - 12:07:31 PM; The speaker further explained the current method of calculating the estimated cost per pupil, which involves totaling all school district submissions to the Department of Education and subtracting certain expenditures. They noted that the estimate is usually within a few hundred dollars but emphasized that using an actual number would be more accurate.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:09:32.920 - 12:08:23 PM; The speaker confirmed that federal dollars are included in the estimated cost per pupil calculation. They were asked if moving from estimated to most current costs would result in an increase or decrease, to which they replied it would depend on the department's estimates, but the variance is usually minimal.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:10:34.880 - 12:09:25 PM; The speaker recalled a previous discussion on special education funding, where the proposed change to use the most current actual costs was seen as a way to simplify and make the funding more predictable for school districts. They noted that there were no significant concerns raised during the education funding committee discussions.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:12:30.439 - 12:11:21 PM; The speaker addressed the purpose of special education aid, previously known as catastrophic aid, questioning whether it should focus on costs associated with students with the highest degree of need. They noted that the proposed change was more of a technical cleanup rather than a policy change.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:13:49.600 - 12:12:40 PM; The speaker clarified that the Department of Education had included certain changes in their original agency proposal, but these were not included in the governor's proposal. They noted that the document handed out was more of an internal document and explained the department's stance on lease aid and other items.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:15:35.600 - 12:14:26 PM; The speaker discussed the process for unexpended funds in state special education aid, explaining that currently, any surplus is used for court-ordered placements and other treatments. They proposed simplifying the process so that unexpended funds would lapse, and the department would draw a warrant for other programs as needed.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:17:20.279 - 12:16:11 PM; The speaker confirmed the technical nature of proposed changes, such as shifting responsibility from the State Board of Education to the Department of Education and using the most current state average cost instead of estimated costs. They also discussed the removal of the word 'factor' from the grant calculation, as it was no longer used.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:19:10.840 - 12:18:01 PM; The speaker explained the requirement for schools to use the state's portal for the naturalization examination, which is already mandated by law. They noted that schools currently have the option to use local assessments but must report through the state's portal.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:20:14.920 - 12:19:05 PM; The speaker discussed the use of the state's portal for administering the naturalization examination, clarifying that schools must use it to report scores but can use other assessment tools locally. They confirmed that the requirement for the examination was already in place.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:23:21.000 - 12:22:12 PM; The speaker explained that the Department of Education is currently being audited by the LBA for special education processes. They proposed using the LBA's audit as the required audit for special education, citing efficiency.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:25:33.960 - 12:24:24 PM; The speaker discussed the removal of the word 'factor' from the grant calculation, explaining that it would not change the grant determination but was a technical correction. They confirmed that the committee was moving forward with this change.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:28:40.160 - 12:27:31 PM; The speaker introduced a program at the Department of Education established last year, which encourages individuals with industry credentials to become computer science teachers. They mentioned a stipend program for these teachers and a partnership with the University System and Virtual Learning Academy to expand the use of these funds.
HB2 114h: Lauren Banker, University System of New Hampshire Information Only03:30:48.319 - 12:29:39 PM; Lauren Banker discussed the goals of the computer science credential program, including increasing access to high-quality college experiences for academically motivated high school students, accelerating progress towards higher education degree completion, and supporting college readiness across the state. They confirmed that the program does not overlap with other offerings.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:32:43.199 - 12:31:34 PM; The speaker discussed the process for individuals with industry credentials to become computer science teachers, explaining that they would need to go through credentialing and then receive stipends after teaching for a year. They acknowledged the challenge of utilizing retired professionals in schools but supported the program.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:35:43.800 - 12:34:34 PM; The speaker proposed using the October 1st count instead of the November 1st count for making payments to charter schools, citing minimal variance in enrollment and the need to save time and energy for both the department and the schools.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:38:54.080 - 12:37:45 PM; The speaker discussed public school infrastructure grants, known as SAFE grants, which are used for school safety projects. They proposed removing the requirement for these grants to go through the fiscal committee, noting that this would expedite the process and that the grants are approved by a legislative commission.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:42:01.760 - 12:40:52 PM; The speaker addressed a funding issue for a state assessment administrator position, explaining that the position was previously split between state and federal funds, but an error led to the removal of the state funding portion. They requested the restoration of the state funding to maintain the position's funding balance.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:45:56.640 - 12:44:47 PM; The speaker discussed charter school funding, explaining that the Department of Education had provided estimates for existing, new, and pending charter schools. They noted the governor's budget and the department's estimates differed, and the committee needed to consider how to handle the funding.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:48:21.840 - 12:47:12 PM; The speaker explained the enrollment estimates for charter schools, detailing the projected number of students for the upcoming years and the funding implications. They confirmed that the estimates included all existing and new charter schools, including the Virtual Learning Academy.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:52:00.960 - 12:50:51 PM; The speaker addressed concerns about the impact of charter school growth on public school funding, explaining that the department's estimates for public school enrollment decline already account for students moving to charter schools. They noted that the funding would be adjusted based on actual enrollment.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only04:00:06.159 - 12:58:57 PM; The speaker discusses the budget adjustments based on new March numbers, explaining that the governor's budget was prepared before the school year started and was adjusted for a payment on March 1st. They mention a slight increase in charter school students, around 200-250, and note the approval of new schools by the state board and applications submitted to the Department of Education.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only04:01:00.040 - 12:59:51 PM; The speaker addresses the phase-out grants, explaining that one more year of calculations is needed for students taking an EFA this year, and after that, no new cohorts will be added to the phase-out grant calculations. The grants will be paid through fiscal year 28.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only04:02:02.720 - 1:00:53 PM; The speaker discusses line 17 of the budget, which is related to Bedford starting kindergarten. They clarify that the line for 2027 is still an estimate and not locked in, and it is specifically related to Bedford's addition of kindergarten, not assuming more programs coming on board.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only04:03:07.040 - 1:01:58 PM; The speaker concludes the discussion on education lines and thanks Miss Davis for her input, hoping not to need her on Friday but ensuring they know how to reach her if necessary.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only04:03:58.560 - 1:02:49 PM; The speaker outlines the plan for Friday, mentioning reconsideration of bills from work sessions and the need for a confirmed list of items to be discussed. They mention potential topics like motor vehicle fees, highway fund, vehicle inspection repeal, fishing and game, and amendments related to the education trust fund.
HB2 114h: Unknown Speaker Information Only04:05:47.840 - 1:04:38 PM; The speaker discusses the inclusion of public transportation in the Friday agenda, specifically the transit match, and the need for amendments to be confirmed and included in a single package for easier handling. They also mention ongoing discussions about e911 allocations and the need to contact Amy and Mr. McIntyre.