Committee Summary for House Education Policy and Administration (11/05/2025)

Bill/Time	Type	Title	Sponsor
HB131 00:03:08.239 - 8:31:49 AM	Public Hearing	requiring school boards to develop and enact policies regarding personal cell phone use in schools.	Ladd, Rick(R)[B+]2024
HB121 3000H 03:05:29.680 - 11:34:10 AM	Public Hearing	establishing local school district special education parent advisory councils.	Cordelli, Glenn(R)[A-]2024
HB360 2025-3057H 05:24:30.080 - 1:53:11 PM	Executive Session	prohibiting public schools from performing diagnostic tests or surgical procedures, or prescribing pharmaceutical drugs.	Noble, Kristin(R)[A+]2024
HB360 05:27:53.200 - 1:56:34 PM	Executive Session	prohibiting public schools from performing diagnostic tests or surgical procedures, or prescribing pharmaceutical drugs.	Noble, Kristin(R)[A+]2024
SB33 2025-3079H 05:30:57.360 - 1:59:38 PM	Executive Session	relative to the regulation of public school materials.	Avard, Kevin(R)[C+]2024
SB33 05:37:15.760 - 2:05:56 PM	Executive Session	relative to the regulation of public school materials.	Avard, Kevin(R)[C+]2024
SB34 2025-3056H 05:40:14.718 - 2:08:55 PM	Executive Session	relative to parental consent for student participation in Medicaid to schools program.	Ward, Ruth(R)[C+]2024
SB34 05:48:17.520 - 2:16:58 PM	Executive Session	relative to parental consent for student participation in Medicaid to schools program.	Ward, Ruth(R)[C+]2024
SB211 05:49:18.878 - 2:17:59 PM	Executive Session	relative to biological sex in student athletics.	Avard, Kevin(R)[C+]2024
HB362 05:52:13.360 - 2:20:54 PM	Executive Session	granting the department of education rulemaking authority to require candidates to obtain passing scores on professional education assessments.	Ladd, Rick(R)[B+]2024
HB79 2025-3073h 05:55:39.920 - 2:24:20 PM	Executive Session	establishing a commission to study the privatization of the liquor commission.	Leishman, Peter(D)[D-]2024
HB564 06:01:55.760 - 2:30:36 PM	Executive Session	relative to the adoption of school administrative unit budgets.	Vose, Michael(R)[A]2024
HB748 0378h 06:12:34.400 - 2:41:15 PM	Executive Session	establishing a local education freedom account program.	Verville, Kevin(R)[B+]2024
HB131 3071h 06:22:22.480 - 2:51:03 PM	Executive Session	requiring school boards to develop and enact policies regarding personal cell phone use in schools.	Ladd, Rick(R)[B+]2024
HB121 3086h 07:27:32.240 - 3:56:13 PM	Executive Session	establishing local school district special education parent advisory councils.	Cordelli, Glenn(R)[A-]2024

HB131: Committee Chair Information Only00:03:08.239 - 8:31:49 AM; The chair welcomes attendees to the House Education Policy and Administration committee meeting, provides housekeeping information on restroom locations, announces the two non-germane bill hearings for HB131 at the start and HB121 at 10:30, leads the pledge of allegiance, notes substitutes for absent representatives, outlines the schedule including an executive session at 2:00 PM to execute the two bills and remaining retained bills, expresses hope to finish today without needing tomorrow, and turns the gavel over to Vice Chair Noble to commence the first hearing.
HB131: Representative Glenn Cordelli, Tuftonboro/Wolfeboro Support00:07:00.000 - 8:35:41 AM; Representative Cordelli introduces the non-germane amendment to HB131, which modifies the final version of last year's SB210 on bullying and cyberbullying prevention. He explains that the amendment addresses issues from the committee of conference where the Senate wanted only a study, but the House preferred action, building on prior cyberbullying measures from Representative McDonald's bill. The amendment adds language on retaliation against students and parents for reporting incidents. He walks through changes: on page one, correcting 'shall include' to 'may include' for communication methods like handbooks and websites. On page two, inserting procedures for reporting bullying, cyberbullying, and retaliation, requiring school staff and bus drivers to report to principals. In subsection H, adding measures to ensure student safety and prevent further bullying. In subsection J, mandating collaboration between principals across districts for investigations, drawn from McDonald's bill. He notes inclusion of retaliation in remediation and, in section L on page three, requiring a conference with the perpetrator and parents to discuss the incident.
HB131: Representative Glenn Cordelli, Tuftonboro/Wolfeboro Support00:16:28.000 - 8:45:09 AM; Representative Cordelli continues explaining the amendment to HB131. He notes that the amendment inserts 'perpetrator' into the language to ensure inclusion in conferences, improving communication about processes and policies. He discusses updating the date in Roman numeral 5 to January 1, 2027, requiring school districts to report on integrated policies. He adds new Roman numeral 7 on page four, subjecting students who admit to or are found engaging in harassment, intimidation, or retaliation to disciplinary action, and also disciplining false reporting. Section 4, a repeal, takes effect in 2027. The intent is to address lessons from last year, enhance awareness, and handle retaliation incidents.
HB131: Representative Murray Information Only00:20:10.960 - 8:48:51 AM; Representative Murray asks about the bill's requirement for communication between districts and charter schools, noting the absence of provisions for private schools. The sponsor responds that cyber bullying involving private schools is covered in last year's passed bill. Murray follows up on the prospective repeal, and the sponsor explains it was suggested by legislative drafting for a future date.
HB131: Representative Paul Information Only00:21:25.039 - 8:50:06 AM; Representative Paul asks for a definition of 'reasonable person' on page four. The sponsor explains it is common statutory language used in criminal and other matters.
HB131: Representative Selig Information Only00:22:48.000 - 8:51:29 AM; Representative Selig expresses confusion about repealing the definition of bullying without inserting a new one, questioning how bullying is now defined. The sponsor clarifies that it repeals 193-F:3, I(b), leaving in place the part about bullying occurring on school property or at school-sponsored activities, and that the definition is elsewhere in statute. Selig follows up on private or parochial schools in scenarios like sporting events, asking about repercussions for bullying by their students against public school students. The sponsor notes it covers school-sponsored events, private schools have their own policies, and such incidents would be reported, potentially involving athletic associations.
HB131: Representative Murray Information Only00:24:45.520 - 8:53:26 AM; Representative Murray questions the change from gross negligence to negligence on page 4, lines 21-22, noting the lower legal threshold and lack of input from judiciary or the Attorney General's office. The sponsor recalls the change was in SB210 last year, which passed the House but not the Senate. Murray follows up on striking 'deliberate indifference' and inserting a new definition, expressing confusion about implications without judiciary input.
HB131: Representative Damon Information Only00:26:31.760 - 8:55:12 AM; Representative Damon questions the repeal of 193-F:3, I(b), quoting the clause about bullying including actions motivated by an imbalance of power based on a pupil's actual or perceived personal characteristics.
HB131: Representative Cordelli Information Only00:28:01.679 - 8:56:42 AM; Representative Cordelli questions the removal of language from the bullying definition regarding actions motivated by an imbalance of power based on a pupil's actual or perceived personal characteristics, behaviors, or beliefs, or association with another person. He notes this was part of SB210 last year and asks if the committee understands why it was removed. He references page 601 and confirms the language.
HB131: Representative Han Oppose00:29:47.360 - 8:58:28 AM; Representative Timothy Han from Durham opposes the amendment due to its complexity and issues. He objects to deleting RSA 193-F:31B, arguing it narrows bullying scope to explicit threats, ignoring harassment based on identity like racism, anti-gay, or anti-trans sentiments. He believes retaining imperfect language is better than none. He notes SB210 passed on party lines without unanimous support and failed in conference. He criticizes additions to 193-F:5 as unnecessary, mandatory conferences even without parental participation, and including bus drivers without distinction. He supports anti-bullying efforts but finds the bill unready, suggesting reformatting for clarity to ease legislative review. He advises against advancing the amendment today.
HB131: Michelle Wongren, New Hampshire Legal Assistance Oppose00:38:09.920 - 9:06:50 AM; Michelle Wongren, Youth Law Project Director at New Hampshire Legal Assistance and part of the Youth Policy Advocacy Group, opposes the amendment due to rushed procedure without adequate notice, preventing preparation. She requests rejection to follow normal legislative process. Substantively, she highlights unnoted changes: undefined retaliation, reporting by vendors/contractors, increased notifications potentially conflicting with FERPA, mandatory conferences (which she partially supports for parental involvement), new educator misconduct definition, and mandatory discipline for bullying/harassment/intimidation regardless of age or circumstance, lacking distinctions for young children or disabilities. She notes deletion of power imbalance from bullying definition, crucial for disability-based bullying. She points out inconsistencies with current law on appropriate discipline, MTSSB framework, and graduated responses in RSA 193:13. She argues exclusionary discipline is ineffective, advocating evidence-based approaches like peer mediation and active bystanders. She recommends voting no and using a study committee for better tools on parental collaboration.
HB131: Emma Savini, New Futures Oppose01:02:25.280 - 9:31:06 AM; Emma Savini, Children's Behavioral Health Policy Coordinator at New Futures, acknowledges bullying as an issue and appreciates the bill's intent for safe schools but opposes the language, especially section 7 mandating discipline. She advocates evidence-based MTSSB framework under RSA 135-F, customizable per district, which reduced bullying incidents from 2016 until COVID. MTSSB tiers promote anti-bullying culture, teach bystander intervention, social norms, and involve parents for better outcomes. Federal data shows 20-23% bullying reduction. She warns exclusionary discipline like suspension/expulsion causes isolation, anxiety, depression, perpetuating cycles, especially for traumatized students. She suggests bolstering MTSSB via funding/coaching instead. She notes budget cuts reduced implementation support.
HB131: Caitlyn Bernier, Merrimack Oppose01:13:20.480 - 9:42:01 AM; Caitlyn Bernier from Merrimack opposes the amendment to HB131. She emphasizes the importance of addressing bullying and cyberbullying to support students, families, and schools but is concerned that the bill's language does not adequately consider students with disabilities or those on a 504 plan. She argues that a uniform discipline approach is ineffective for all students, as some bullies may themselves be victims needing understanding rather than punitive measures. She references the latest New Hampshire bullying report showing a slight increase in documented cases, mostly in middle schools, and questions whether this reflects under-documentation elsewhere. As a parent whose child experienced bullying, she highlights the difficulties in reporting and the fear of consequences like records affecting children. She urges prioritizing student well-being over mere reporting. Additionally, she worries the new verbiage could facilitate easier claims of bullying to justify out-of-district placements at full district cost, increasing financial burdens.
HB131: Karen Rosenberg, Disability Rights Center Oppose01:16:45.920 - 9:45:26 AM; Karen Rosenberg, policy director and attorney at the Disability Rights Center, opposes the amendment to HB131. She notes improvements in bullying incidents based on Department of Education reports, with founded incidents rising from 0.5% to 4% but still problematic, especially repeated bullying targeting students with disabilities. Her office has seen fewer complaints about schools failing obligations this year, indicating positive trends, but stresses the need for appropriate solutions. She supports parental involvement but criticizes the amendment for not ensuring meetings with parents of perpetrators accommodate schedules, potentially occurring without them, which hinders buy-in and interventions. She opposes mandatory exclusionary discipline like suspension or expulsion for all involved students, arguing it fails to teach appropriate behavior, resolve underlying issues, or protect victims, as bullies return unchanged. She highlights decreases in cyberbullying but persistent middle school issues, suggesting a study. During Q&A, she discusses potential benefits of cell phone restrictions for cyberbullying, the need for efforts to involve parents in meetings, distinctions between bullying reports and civil rights violations, and school responsibilities for educating suspended students with disabilities under federal law.
HB131: Becky Wilson, New Hampshire School Boards Association Oppose01:30:15.360 - 9:58:56 AM; Becky Wilson from the New Hampshire School Boards Association opposes the amendment to HB131, noting many concerns already raised by prior speakers. She highlights conflicting timelines with existing processes like manifestation determinations and bullying investigations, vague definitions risking false claims, and potential chilling effects on reporting. She worries teachers could face private actions or license issues for reports believed true but later deemed false, and students might hesitate to report due to fear of discipline. This could confuse staff, students, and families seeking resolutions. Drawing from her experience as a school administrator, she notes middle schools' high volume of reports often not meeting statutory bullying definitions but still addressed. She cautions against adopting the amendment without further discussion to avoid confusion and under-addressing issues.
HB131: Annie Banfield, parent advocate Support01:35:18.560 - 10:03:59 AM; Annie Banfield, a parent advocate in New Hampshire, supports the amendment to HB131. She shares experiences working with parents facing school bullying, noting many have testified before the committee and some withdrawn children from public schools due to safety concerns. She argues current laws fall short, particularly in determining bullying incidents, often left to administrators who narrowly define it, leading to unreported cases despite suspensions or police involvement. She distrusts Department of Education reports for underreporting and sees power imbalances favoring districts over parents. Adding 'retaliation' and 'harassment' to the law would clarify definitions, prevent sidestepping responsibilities, and build family confidence. Addressing prior points, she clarifies discipline includes teaching and corrective measures beyond suspension/expulsion, calls for independent studies on MTSSB's effectiveness (citing Keene's issues), notes FERPA allows sharing non-identifying perpetrator info, and stresses addressing unreported harassment driving families from schools. She urges action to protect students.
HB131: Glenn Cordelli, representing Tuftonboro, Wolfeboro, and Ossipee Support01:56:35.119 - 10:25:16 AM; Glenn Cordelli introduces a non-germane amendment to House Bill 131 aimed at addressing financial mismanagement issues exemplified by the Claremont school district case. He describes Claremont as a case study of failures in auditing, communication, accountability, and transparency. He highlights that audits were not conducted for years despite legal requirements, and the Department of Revenue Administration (DRRA) commissioner has authority to impose fines but did not act. Local officials and the Department of Education (DOE) were not informed, receiving false and misleading information via the DOE-25 reporting form. The public was unaware, with no discussions in school board meetings, leading to a sudden revelation of a $5 million deficit. The amendment seeks to remedy these by shortening the audit timeline from one year to four months after the close of books and requiring audits to be posted on the governing body's website along with findings and recommendations. It covers sections of RSA 21-J for municipal and school district audits to enhance oversight and prevent future issues.
HB131: Glenn Cordelli Support02:01:50.000 - 10:30:31 AM; The speaker continues discussing the bill's provisions for enhancing audit transparency and accountability in government bodies, including school districts. He explains that audit reviews must occur at the next public meeting of the governing body, whether a town, city, or school district, emphasizing communication. He details changes allowing the DRA commissioner to initiate financial or forensic audits as needed, more frequently than every two years, and notes that a forensic audit should be performed in Claremont. If a school district is involved, the DRA must notify the Department of Education. The bill requires full audit reports, findings, and recommendations to be posted on government websites and addressed publicly for accountability.
HB131: Glenn Cordelli Support02:02:53.440 - 10:31:34 AM; The speaker addresses notification requirements for failure to complete audits, strengthening penalties from $250 to $500 per day, starting 60 days after notice instead of 90. He then moves to Department of Education statutes, highlighting requirements for school districts to report audits by September 1st, with potential funding withholding if delays are unreasonable. He references House Bill 752, which allows probation for charter schools, and argues that traditional public schools, like in Claremont, should also be eligible for probation under similar circumstances to ensure accountability.
HB131: Glenn Cordelli Support02:02:53.440 - 10:31:34 AM; The speaker continues explaining Section 7 of the bill, which allows districts to be placed on probationary status for up to 6 months under circumstances similar to those for charter schools, such as failure to meet fiscal management standards, material violations, financial instability, or non-compliance with reporting requirements. If problems are remedied, probation is unnecessary; otherwise, the Department of Education can impose it with written notice to the school board, legislature, and governor's office. The probation period provides time to address issues, emphasizing communication and involvement of the school board, contrasting with issues in Claremont where school boards were not properly involved.
HB131: Glenn Cordelli Support02:07:51.760 - 10:36:32 AM; If issues are not remedied during probation, the Department can appoint an administrator to oversee corrective actions, with the state board providing optional authorities such as overriding school board decisions, attending meetings, establishing implementation strategies, informing families and the public, supervising daily activities, reassigning personnel, authorizing student transfers to non-probation districts, appointing staff for superintendent services, and establishing fiscal guidelines and internal controls. The administrator must report to the department and state board, ensuring ongoing oversight post-term to address failures in communication, audits, transparency, and accountability, similar to the situation in Claremont.
HB131: Representative Murray Information Only02:14:48.320 - 10:43:29 AM; The representative asks a question about a reference in the bill to RSA 309A regarding auditing publications and reports, noting that it may have been repealed and replaced by 309B in public accountancy law, seeking clarification on whether this is correct.
HB131: Glenn Cordelli Information Only02:15:30.000 - 10:44:11 AM; The speaker asks for the specific line being referenced and agrees to check on the status of RSA 309A versus 309B.
HB131: Representative Murray Information Only02:15:45.000 - 10:44:26 AM; The representative follows up by asking about references to accountancy law and whether the bill also addresses sections in education law like 195 D18 regarding finance and auditing, mentioning biannual reports and audits under the red book, and expressing confusion about which areas of law are being changed.
HB131: Glenn Cordelli Information Only02:16:07.520 - 10:44:48 AM; The speaker explains that discussions with the Department of Revenue Administration and DOE focused on sections under 21J, and any additional sections under DOE law were not part of those discussions.
HB131: Representative Brookie Information Only02:17:34.959 - 10:46:15 AM; Representative Brookie comments on DOE25, stating it does not discuss the financial health of the district but only sets per pupil costs. She questions who would pay for the mandated forensic audit and the implications of the four-month window for audits given the limited number of auditing firms in New Hampshire, asking what happens if the timeline is not met due to availability.
HB131: Witness (Bill Sponsor) Information Only02:17:34.959 - 10:46:15 AM; The witness explains that under current law, the cost of the audit would be borne by the district. Regarding the four-month window, the witness notes conversations about extending it to six months and will consider that for the afternoon.
HB131: Representative Murray Information Only02:19:05.439 - 10:47:46 AM; Representative Murray seeks clarification on references to municipalities, counties, cities, and towns in the amendment, particularly regarding financial responsibility for reimbursements or payments on page three, line 10 under 1J21. He questions if counties are intended to be financially responsible.
HB131: Witness (Bill Sponsor) Information Only02:19:05.439 - 10:47:46 AM; The witness confirms that the reference to county, city, town, or district is existing law in the municipal section that also covers school districts. He notes he did not address counties specifically, as the focus is on school districts, though he has experience with county-level audits.
HB131: Representative Celig Information Only02:20:22.319 - 10:49:03 AM; Representative Celig questions page five, paragraph 12, regarding the state-appointed administrator's ability to cancel or renegotiate contracts other than those of certified teachers employed for more than one year prior to the appointment. She seeks clarification on whether this applies to long-term staff like an administrator with 20 years.
HB131: Witness (Bill Sponsor) Information Only02:20:22.319 - 10:49:03 AM; The witness clarifies that 'administrator' refers to the one appointed by the Department of Education, not staff. The provision allows renegotiation of certified teachers' contracts if they have been in the district for more than one year prior to the state appointment. He agrees to make this more explicit in the language.
HB131: Representative Terry Information Only02:21:30.240 - 10:50:11 AM; Representative Terry asks about the provision where the department appoints or hires an administrator under 1865A, questioning who pays for it—whether the state board of education, as they are effectively in charge during this time.
HB131: Witness (Bill Sponsor) Information Only02:21:30.240 - 10:50:11 AM; The witness states that the department would pay, and he has draft language allowing the department to draw a warrant for the administrator's payment.
HB131: Representative Damon Support02:22:30.800 - 10:51:11 AM; Representative Damon, representing Claremont, supports the bill and notes involvement in the district's financial concerns, describing Claremont as the 'canary in the coal mine' for broader issues. He supports extending the audit timeline to six months based on audit field feedback and raises concerns about lacking qualifications for the administrator, suggesting a strong financial background. He questions if education experience is necessary, emphasizing business experience over teaching background.
HB131: Witness (Bill Sponsor) Information Only02:22:30.800 - 10:51:11 AM; The witness explains he did not specify qualifications, leaving it to the Department of Education to appoint someone internal or external with a strong financial background. He agrees financial expertise is key, noting deficiencies in financial training for superintendents and administrators, and references discussions with the national teacher quality council.
HB131: Representative Bricky Information Only02:25:43.359 - 10:54:24 AM; Representative Bricky asks the chair if they will hear from the New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration, as a document was received from them.
HB131: Chair Information Only02:25:43.359 - 10:54:24 AM; The chair confirms they will hear from the Department of Revenue Administration.
HB131: Representative Damon Information Only02:26:51.680 - 10:55:32 AM; Representative Damon suggests modifying the requirement on page three for publishing the audit report in the annual report and on the website to only include summary findings in print due to costs for distressed districts. He also questions the newspaper publication requirement, noting many areas lack local newspapers.
HB131: Witness (Bill Sponsor) Information Only02:26:51.680 - 10:55:32 AM; The witness asks for the specific line on the newspaper requirement.
HB131: Representative Damon Information Only02:28:11.200 - 10:56:52 AM; Representative Damon seeks explanation of 'probation' for school districts, including criteria, impacts on accreditation, and operations.
HB131: Witness (Bill Sponsor) Information Only02:28:11.200 - 10:56:52 AM; The witness notes that in HB752 charter school law, probation can lead to revocation, but he did not address accreditation here, seeing it as a separate issue for the accrediting agency.
HB131: Representative Murray Information Only02:29:27.680 - 10:58:08 AM; Representative Murray questions page three, subsection 4, lines 17-23, on withholding state aid, asking if it includes federal pass-through monies.
HB131: Witness (Bill Sponsor) Information Only02:29:27.680 - 10:58:08 AM; The witness clarifies the intent is for state funds, not federal, and references existing statutes where the department withholds funds for non-compliance, such as emergency plans.
HB131: Senator Bricky Information Only02:30:22.560 - 10:59:03 AM; Senator Bricky questions page five, section 12, line 8, on canceling or renegotiating contracts, confirming teachers are protected but others can be canceled, and notes most contracts have cancellation clauses.
HB131: Unidentified Speaker Information Only02:33:02.560 - 11:01:43 AM; The speaker discusses concerns about the financial burden of canceling a superintendent's contract under the bill, noting that districts would still be responsible for paying the superintendent even if canceled, potentially costing up to three years' salary. They question how to navigate this and emphasize it as an undue burden on already strained districts.
HB131: Unidentified Responder Information Only02:33:54.800 - 11:02:35 AM; The responder agrees that canceling a contract would only occur under severe circumstances and views the provision as an option rather than a mandate.
HB131: Representative Celig Information Only02:33:54.800 - 11:02:35 AM; The representative asks if someone from the department will be available to answer clarifying questions about the process.
HB131: Madam Chair Information Only02:33:54.800 - 11:02:35 AM; The chair confirms that someone from the department is present and available.
HB131: Representative Murray Information Only02:35:08.479 - 11:03:49 AM; The representative inquires about the impact on collective bargaining agreements and benefits when contracts are canceled or renegotiated, noting that the bill does not address this.
HB131: Representative Cordelli Information Only02:35:58.800 - 11:04:39 AM; The chair thanks the previous speaker and calls on Representative Han.
HB131: Representative Timothy Han, Durham Oppose02:35:58.800 - 11:04:39 AM; Representative Han, representing Strafford County District 10 in Durham, expresses concerns that the bill, particularly the section on administrator powers to cancel contracts, grants too much unilateral authority and is unworkable. He highlights odd wording about appointing 'competent' administrators and notes that school districts are governmental subdivisions like cities or towns, making takeovers problematic. He discusses the Claremont situation as stemming from revenue shortfalls rather than overspending, a broader issue affecting many entities, and while acknowledging the bill's valid motivation, criticizes its implementation and anticipates amendments but doubts support for the final version.
HB131: Jennifer Ramsey, Department of Revenue Administration Information Only02:41:09.520 - 11:09:50 AM; Jennifer Ramsey, tax policy counsel for DRA, accompanied by Bruce Canor, thanks Representative Cordelli for incorporating their feedback on drafts. She shares a bill analysis and raises technical concerns: 1) Inserting 'school districts' into statutes may create confusion since they are already covered; suggests a full review. 2) Repealing the local elected auditor option without making professional auditors mandatory could leave a loophole. 3) Adjusting report deadlines to September 1 conflicts with rate-setting timelines. She also discusses implementation challenges with compressed audit deadlines affecting rate-setting, recommending keeping the one-year deadline or specifying prior-year audits for review, and changing 'may' to 'shall' for disallowing fund balances when financial data is suspect. She estimates costs for portal updates at around $75,000 and provides data on non-compliance rates (5% for FY2022, 15% for FY2023, 35% for FY2024 as of August) with no fines issued to school districts yet.
HB131: Representative Damon Information Only02:49:21.840 - 11:18:02 AM; The representative thanks the DRA representatives, asks if a fiscal note was requested (it was not), and inquires about financial impacts, learning about potential $75,000 portal update costs. Follows up on non-compliance incidence and fines.
HB131: Representative Murray Information Only02:52:04.560 - 11:20:45 AM; The representative asks if the August non-compliance data differentiates between calendar and fiscal year reporters, learning that school districts all use fiscal years ending June 30.
HB131: Representative Dry Information Only02:53:04.499 - 11:21:45 AM; The representative seeks clarification on the 'may' and 'shall' language in the amendment (page 2, lines 14-20), receiving an explanation on suggested changes for imposing fines and disallowing fund balances.
HB131: Representative Sally Information Only02:53:51.359 - 11:22:32 AM; The representative, seeking concrete examples, asks for a walkthrough of the process for a hypothetical non-compliant school district like ABC, including how non-compliance is detected, notifications, waivers, and fines.
HB131: Bruce Canor, Department of Revenue Administration Information Only02:54:50.479 - 11:23:31 AM; Bruce Canor explains the non-compliance process for audits due June 30 following the fiscal year end, involving municipal advisors contacting districts, official late notices starting a 90-day clock for waivers and potential fines under new 2022 legislation. He notes the disconnect between audit submission and property tax rate-setting using unaudited MS-25 reports, and that the process is gradual, not abrupt, with no retrospective application.
HB121 3000H: Brian Hawkins, NEA New Hampshire Oppose03:05:29.680 - 11:34:10 AM; Brian Hawkins from NEA New Hampshire opposes the non-germane amendment 3000H, supporting stronger audit requirements but arguing the amendment is too broad and complex for a rushed process. He notes LSRs are filed for next year and urges thorough vetting. He highlights concerns about the administrator's broad powers, including overriding management decisions, supervising staff, reassigning duties, authorizing transfers without agreements, and cancelling contracts without clear standards or fiscal backing. He recommends studying other states' laws, narrowing to fiscal issues, and addressing funding needs.
HB121 3000H: Barry Christina, New Hampshire School Boards Association Oppose03:15:11.439 - 11:43:52 AM; Barry Christina from the New Hampshire School Boards Association supports transparency in audits but opposes the amendment's probationary provisions, which he sees as overly broad and not limited to fiscal issues. He clarifies the audit timeline change from 12 to 4 months likely means engaging an auditor, not completing the audit, due to capacity limits. He argues charter school precedents don't apply to public schools, notes potential for non-fiscal triggers like bullying investigations leading to receivership, and raises concerns about state board discretion, interactions with other bills like SB57, student transfer rights, administrator qualifications, contract renegotiations, and the need to hear all Claremont-related bills together for comprehensive review.
HB121 3000H: Caitlyn Bernier, Merrimack resident and budget committee member Oppose03:28:06.640 - 11:56:47 AM; Caitlyn Bernier from Merrimack opposes the amendment as an overreach that undermines local control and special education voices, attaching it sneakily to a bill for parent councils. She confirms her district's compliance with audits but criticizes state takeover powers like firing staff and non-renewing teachers. She highlights unaddressed fiscal impacts, including costs for new auditing administration amid 35% non-compliance, loss of local autonomy, and taxpayer burdens. She supports annual audits and public meetings but calls for appropriate, non-overreaching consequences, accusing the majority of dismantling public education funding.
HB121 3000H: Diana Fenton, Department of Education Attorney Information Only03:33:02.880 - 12:01:43 PM; Diana Fenton, an attorney with the Department of Education, provides information on the amendment without taking a position. She notes unclear fiscal impacts for appointing administrators, defers to the Attorney General on overriding elected boards and withholding adequacy payments, expresses concern over cancelling/renegotiating contracts as a third-party intervention, and highlights vagueness in 'reasonable notice' needing legislative definition. She is unfamiliar with probation/receivership durations beyond charter schools (RSA 194-B) and commits to clarifying RSAs like 309A vs. 309B. She supports seeking AG opinions before executive sessions to avoid legal issues.
HB360 2025-3057H: Representative Noble Support05:24:30.080 - 1:53:11 PM; Moved ought to pass with amendment 2025-3057H, which removes diagnostic testing from the original bill to simplify it and focus on preventing surgical procedures and prescribing pharmaceutical drugs on school grounds.
HB360 2025-3057H: Representative Terry Information Only05:25:17.200 - 1:53:58 PM; Seconded the motion and asked for the amendment number.
HB360 2025-3057H: Unidentified Representative (opposing) Oppose05:26:35.600 - 1:55:16 PM; Commented that there are no surgical procedures or pharmaceutical drugs prescribed on school grounds by school physicians or nurses in New Hampshire, and will vote no.
HB360 2025-3057H: Representative Noble (response) Support05:26:35.600 - 1:55:16 PM; Responded that while not yet in New Hampshire, it is happening in school-based health clinics elsewhere, making this a preventative bill.
HB360: Committee Clerk Information Only05:27:53.200 - 1:56:34 PM; Conducted roll call vote on the amendment, resulting in 10 yes, 8 no.
HB360: Representative Noble Support05:27:53.200 - 1:56:34 PM; Moved ought to pass as amended.
HB360: Committee Clerk Information Only05:28:52.320 - 1:57:33 PM; Conducted roll call vote on ought to pass as amended, resulting in 10 yes, 8 no. Discussed minority report to be prepared by Representative Cornell.
SB33 2025-3079H: Representative Noble Support05:30:57.360 - 1:59:38 PM; Moved ought to pass with amendment 2025-3079H, which incorporates definitions and criteria from HB 324 for clarity, strikes language requiring challenged materials to be placed at the front reception desk, clarifies applicability to higher education by removing K-12 exemption, and eliminates appeal to the state board of education to keep decisions local.
SB33 2025-3079H: Representative Celig Oppose05:33:37.440 - 2:02:18 PM; Opposes the amendment and bill as it fundamentally bans books and suppresses free speech.
SB33 2025-3079H: Unidentified Representative Support05:34:43.760 - 2:03:24 PM; Thanked Representative Noble for bringing forward the bill to keep age-appropriate materials in schools.
SB33 2025-3079H: Representative Damon Oppose05:34:43.760 - 2:03:24 PM; Opposes the bill, quoting the governor's veto message on HB 324 that current law allows parents to address inappropriate materials locally, and the state should not intervene.
SB33 2025-3079H: Unidentified Representative (response) Information Only05:35:46.320 - 2:04:27 PM; Noted that the veto message related to curriculum but not libraries, and curriculum can include library materials.
SB33 2025-3079H: Representative Noble Support05:35:46.320 - 2:04:27 PM; Emphasized that samples of materials provided show they are inappropriate for minors, explaining why the issue persists.
SB33: Committee Clerk Information Only05:37:15.760 - 2:05:56 PM; Conducted roll call vote on the amendment, resulting in 10 yes, 8 no.
SB33: Representative Noble Support05:38:07.280 - 2:06:48 PM; Moved ought to pass as amended.
SB33: Committee Clerk Information Only05:38:07.280 - 2:06:48 PM; Conducted roll call vote on ought to pass as amended, resulting in 10 yes, 8 no. Assigned minority ITL report to Representative Celich.
SB34 2025-3056H: Unidentified Representative Support05:40:14.718 - 2:08:55 PM; Moved ought to pass with amendment 2025-3056H, which renumbers sections to align with HB2 without substantive changes.
SB34 2025-3056H: Representative Marie Oppose05:41:33.680 - 2:10:14 PM; Will vote no because federal law requires only one signature for Medicaid access, adding more could prevent reimbursements and increase costs to districts while services must still be provided.
SB34 2025-3056H: Representative Noble Support05:41:33.680 - 2:10:14 PM; Clarified that parental consent is already required for services outside school, and schools as providers need the same to maintain consistency.
SB34 2025-3056H: Unidentified Representative (response) Oppose05:42:41.760 - 2:11:22 PM; Federal law requires only one signature for benefits access, adding more creates reimbursement problems; services must be provided regardless.
SB34 2025-3056H: Representative Dry Information Only05:42:41.760 - 2:11:22 PM; Asked who can sign if not the parent.
SB34 2025-3056H: Unidentified Representative Information Only05:42:41.760 - 2:11:22 PM; Current requirement is one-time parental signature for admission.
SB34 2025-3056H: Representative Selli Oppose05:43:51.680 - 2:12:32 PM; Cited recommended amendment from state agencies to avoid re-signing for billing code changes, which would burden schools with administrative efforts for the same services.
SB34 2025-3056H: Representative Hall Information Only05:43:51.680 - 2:12:32 PM; Questioned if new services align with IEP/504 meetings where parents already sign.
SB34 2025-3056H: Representative Murray Oppose05:45:59.840 - 2:14:40 PM; Current law requires one-time annual release; the bill would require signatures for each new service, contradicting federal law.
SB34 2025-3056H: Representative Damon Oppose05:45:59.840 - 2:14:40 PM; Noted ongoing work in the other committee to maximize Medicaid reimbursements, suggesting this bill is premature.
SB34 2025-3056H: Unidentified Representative (sponsor response) Support05:47:05.920 - 2:15:46 PM; Has not seen a federal one-signature requirement and offered to provide documentation.
SB34: Committee Clerk Information Only05:48:17.520 - 2:16:58 PM; Conducted roll call vote on the amendment, resulting in 10 yes, 8 no.
SB34: Unidentified Representative Support05:48:17.520 - 2:16:58 PM; Moved ought to pass as amended.
SB34: Committee Clerk Information Only05:49:18.878 - 2:17:59 PM; Conducted roll call vote on ought to pass as amended, resulting in 10 yes, 8 no. Assigned ITL to Representative Murray.
SB211: Unidentified Representative Oppose05:49:18.878 - 2:17:59 PM; Moved inexpedient to legislate (ITL), noting a Senate bill is coming to address this, and existing law covers K-12 while this is for collegiate athletics.
SB211: Committee Clerk Information Only05:50:46.798 - 2:19:27 PM; The clerk calls the vote on SB 211 for Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL).
SB211: Vice Chairman Noble Vote05:51:00.000 - 2:19:41 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
SB211: Representative Terry Vote05:51:05.000 - 2:19:46 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
SB211: Representative Dry Vote05:51:10.000 - 2:19:51 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
SB211: Representative Pernell Vote05:51:15.000 - 2:19:56 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
SB211: Representative Lichfield Vote05:51:20.000 - 2:20:01 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
SB211: Representative McDonald Vote05:51:25.000 - 2:20:06 PM; Votes no on ITL.
SB211: Representative Tenzor Vote05:51:30.000 - 2:20:11 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
SB211: Representative Morse Vote05:51:35.000 - 2:20:16 PM; Votes no on ITL.
SB211: Representative Nato Vote05:51:40.000 - 2:20:21 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
SB211: Representative Cornell Vote05:51:45.000 - 2:20:26 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
SB211: Representative Murray Vote05:51:50.000 - 2:20:31 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
SB211: Representative Krchen Vote05:51:55.000 - 2:20:36 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
SB211: Representative Hall Vote05:52:00.000 - 2:20:41 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
SB211: Representative Ricky Vote05:52:05.000 - 2:20:46 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
SB211: Representative Celic Vote05:52:10.000 - 2:20:51 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
SB211: Representative Damon Vote05:52:15.000 - 2:20:56 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
SB211: Representative Snodgrass Vote05:52:20.000 - 2:21:01 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
SB211: Chairman Cordelli Vote05:52:25.000 - 2:21:06 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
SB211: Committee Chair Information Only05:52:30.000 - 2:21:11 PM; The vote is 16 yays, 2 nays. No minority report. Consent.
HB362: Committee Chair Information Only05:52:13.360 - 2:20:54 PM; Moves to House Bill 362. Representative McDonald moves ITL.
HB362: Representative Morris Vote05:52:30.000 - 2:21:11 PM; Seconds the motion.
HB362: Representative McDonald Information Only05:53:00.000 - 2:21:41 PM; Explains that HB 440 passed earlier, making HB 362 unnecessary, so ITL is appropriate.
HB362: Vice Chairman Noble Vote05:53:40.000 - 2:22:21 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
HB362: Representative Terry Vote05:53:45.000 - 2:22:26 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
HB362: Representative Dry Vote05:53:50.000 - 2:22:31 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
HB362: Representative Pernell Vote05:53:55.000 - 2:22:36 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
HB362: Representative Lichfield Vote05:54:00.000 - 2:22:41 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
HB362: Representative McDonald Vote05:54:05.000 - 2:22:46 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
HB362: Representative Tenzar Vote05:54:10.000 - 2:22:51 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
HB362: Representative Morse Vote05:54:15.000 - 2:22:56 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
HB362: Representative Nato Vote05:54:20.000 - 2:23:01 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
HB362: Representative Cornell Vote05:54:25.000 - 2:23:06 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
HB362: Representative Murray Vote05:54:30.000 - 2:23:11 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
HB362: Representative Hall Vote05:54:35.000 - 2:23:16 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
HB362: Representative Bricky Vote05:54:40.000 - 2:23:21 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
HB362: Representative Celic Vote05:54:45.000 - 2:23:26 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
HB362: Representative Damon Vote05:54:50.000 - 2:23:31 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
HB362: Representative Snodgrass Vote05:54:55.000 - 2:23:36 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
HB362: Chairman Cordelli Vote05:55:00.000 - 2:23:41 PM; Votes yes on ITL.
HB362: Committee Chair Information Only05:55:05.000 - 2:23:46 PM; The vote is 18 yays, 0 nays. Consent calendar.
HB79 2025-3073h: Representative McDonald Support05:55:39.920 - 2:24:20 PM; Moves Ought to Pass (OTP). Moves amendment 2025-3073h to address concerns about commercial properties and out-of-state families by adding language requiring parents to reside in New Hampshire. Explains it adds guardrails without prohibiting small business owners from using nearby schools.
HB79 2025-3073h: Representative Lichfield Support05:55:50.000 - 2:24:31 PM; Seconds the motion and the amendment.
HB79 2025-3073h: Representative Hall Oppose05:57:00.000 - 2:25:41 PM; Opposes as it moves toward open enrollment, which they do not support, and notes a future commission on the topic.
HB79 2025-3073h: Representative McDonald Information Only05:57:45.000 - 2:26:26 PM; Clarifies that the bill and amendment are not full open enrollment but provide guardrails if the legislature moves in that direction.
HB79 2025-3073h: Representative Murray Oppose05:58:00.000 - 2:26:41 PM; Expresses concern about confusion in enrollment predictions, billing, and planning for districts, especially with families owning multiple properties.
HB79 2025-3073h: Committee Clerk Vote05:59:00.000 - 2:27:41 PM; Calls vote on amendment: 10 yes, 8 no. Amendment adopted.
HB79 2025-3073h: Representative McDonald Support05:59:45.000 - 2:28:26 PM; Moves OTP as amended.
HB79 2025-3073h: Committee Chair Information Only06:00:34.958 - 2:29:15 PM; Vote on OTPA: 11 yes, 7 no. Minority report by Representative Hall.
HB564: Committee Clerk Support06:01:55.760 - 2:30:36 PM; Moves Ought to Pass (OTP) to promote transparency and accountability in SAU budgets, citing personal experience.
HB564: Representative Tenzor Support06:02:00.000 - 2:30:41 PM; Seconds the motion.
HB564: Unidentified Representative Information Only06:03:09.200 - 2:31:50 PM; Asks about what happens if districts vote differently on the SAU budget.
HB564: Committee Clerk Information Only06:04:09.040 - 2:32:50 PM; References bill language on majority vote leading to adoption or default to previous year's budget.
HB564: Unidentified Representative Oppose06:04:30.000 - 2:33:11 PM; Opposes the bill as confusing with unanswered questions; suggests using school board elections instead.
HB564: Unidentified Representative Information Only06:06:32.000 - 2:35:13 PM; Clarifies aggregate voting for multi-district SAUs per bill language.
HB564: Representative P. Oppose06:07:20.558 - 2:36:01 PM; Raises concerns about default budgets, recounts, and ballot procedures in non-cooperative districts.
HB564: Unidentified Representative Information Only06:08:36.798 - 2:37:17 PM; Notes procedures exist via RSA 671:26 for ballot counting.
HB564: Committee Clerk Vote06:09:58.160 - 2:38:39 PM; Calls vote on OTP: 11 yes, 7 no. Minority report.
HB748 0378h: Representative Cordelli Support06:12:34.400 - 2:41:15 PM; Moves Ought to Pass (OTP). Offers amendment 0378h to establish a study committee of four House members and one Senator to examine feasibility, funding, special needs services, and eligibility instead of passing the bill as is, due to unresolved issues.
HB748 0378h: Senator Morse Support06:14:15.440 - 2:42:56 PM; Seconds the amendment. Notes the concept's merit and existence in other states like Tennessee, Texas, and Montana.
HB748 0378h: Representative Cornell Oppose06:15:20.558 - 2:44:01 PM; Opposes the bill and studying it further, citing public opposition (2,637 opposed vs. 25 supported).
HB748 0378h: Representative Damon Oppose06:15:40.000 - 2:44:21 PM; Agrees with opposition but suggests if a study committee is formed, it should have clear composition with knowledgeable members from both sides.
HB748 0378h: Representative Murray Information Only06:16:34.480 - 2:45:15 PM; Asks about status of EFA program audit to inform discussions.
HB748 0378h: Representative McDonald Information Only06:17:41.280 - 2:46:22 PM; Defends the Speaker's office in appointing knowledgeable members to committees.
HB748 0378h: Representative Damon Information Only06:17:41.280 - 2:46:22 PM; Clarifies comment was based on experience, not intent to insult.
HB748 0378h: Representative Murray Information Only06:18:00.000 - 2:46:41 PM; Suggests including stakeholders beyond legislators for broader input.
HB748 0378h: Representative Cordelli Information Only06:18:58.000 - 2:47:39 PM; Explains study committees can invite non-voting experts.
HB748 0378h: Committee Chair Information Only06:18:58.000 - 2:47:39 PM; Clarifies difference between study committee and commission.
HB748 0378h: Committee Clerk Vote06:20:09.680 - 2:48:50 PM; Calls vote on amendment: 10 yes, 8 no. Amendment adopted.
HB748 0378h: Representative Cordelli Support06:20:30.000 - 2:49:11 PM; Moves OTP as amended.
HB748 0378h: Representative McDonald Support06:20:35.000 - 2:49:16 PM; Seconds the motion.
HB748 0378h: Committee Clerk Vote06:21:15.120 - 2:49:56 PM; Calls vote on OTPA: 10 yes, 8 no. Minority report.
HB131 3071h: Unidentified Representative Support06:22:22.480 - 2:51:03 PM; Moves Ought to Pass (OTP).
HB131 3071h: Representative Cordon Support06:22:22.480 - 2:51:03 PM; Seconds the motion. Moves amendment 3071h, which incorporates previous amendment 3000.
HB131 3071h: Representative Terry Support06:23:16.798 - 2:51:57 PM; Seconds the amendment to the amendment.
HB131 3071h: Representative Terry Support06:24:03.440 - 2:52:44 PM; Representative Terry explains the amendment on page three, item M, which adds 'perpetrator' to the parties identified in the proposal, making it three parties: perpetrator, parent or guardian, and school personnel. This would allow inclusion in conference.
HB131 3071h: Representative Murray Oppose06:25:05.440 - 2:53:46 PM; Representative Murray expresses concerns about moving forward without answers to significant questions that were referred to outside agencies. She notes that responses have not been received and has concerns about proceeding without them.
HB131 3071h: Representative Celig Oppose06:26:06.080 - 2:54:47 PM; Representative Celig shares personal experience with her child's bullying incident and opposes the bill's language, particularly referring to children as 'perpetrators' instead of needing education. She notes that most testimony was in opposition, raising various questions, and states she cannot support the bill as written.
HB131 3071h: Unnamed Representative Oppose06:27:02.400 - 2:55:43 PM; The representative piggybacks on the testimony heard that morning, stating there is no way they can vote for the bill due to its powerful opposition.
HB131 3071h: Unnamed Representative Information Only06:28:05.280 - 2:56:46 PM; The representative clarifies that no one reached out to the attorney general's office based on Attorney Benton's recommendations, and questions proceeding with a vote anyway. They note other legal questions remain unanswered.
HB131 3071h: Representative Murray Oppose06:28:05.280 - 2:56:46 PM; Representative Murray seeks clarification on the change from 'gross negligence' to 'negligence' and whether it was vetted by the judicial branch. She expresses significant concerns about redefining terms without careful input, as it could lead to litigation.
HB131 3071h: Representative Cordelli Support06:28:05.280 - 2:56:46 PM; Representative Cordelli references written testimony from a parent in the north country whose son was bullied, noting that under current statute 'gross negligence' would not apply, but a lesser standard would allow a right of action. She also consulted an attorney specializing in bullying cases who recommended the lesser language of negligence.
HB131 3071h: Representative Murray Oppose06:30:28.080 - 2:59:09 PM; Representative Murray empathizes with the need to address bullying but reiterates concerns about redefining negligence or gross negligence without judicial branch input, as it could be problematic in litigation.
HB131 3071h: Representative Sy Information Only06:31:16.080 - 2:59:57 PM; Representative Sy seeks clarification on whether the information shared by Representative Cordelli was from testimony during a break or the original hearing. Representative Cordelli clarifies it was from researching the original hearing's written testimony.
HB131 3071h: Committee Vote on Amendment Vote06:31:16.080 - 2:59:57 PM; The committee votes to adopt the amendment: 10 yes (Vice Chairman Noble, Representative Terry, Dry, Pednell, Lichfield, McDonald, Tenzar, Morse, Nato, Chairman Cordelli), 8 no (Cornell, Murray, Christian, Hall, Bricky, Sullig, Damon, Snodgrass).
HB131 3071h: Representative Cordelli Support06:32:09.120 - 3:00:50 PM; Representative Cordelli moves to pass the bill as amended, seconded by Representative Terry. The committee votes: 10 yes (Vice Chairman Noble, Terry, Dry, Pinell, Lichfield, McDonald, Tenzar, Morris, Nato, Chairman Cordelli), 8 no (Cornell, Murray, Christian, Hall, Bricky, Celig, Damon, Snodgrass).
HB131 3071h: Representative Paul Information Only06:33:50.160 - 3:02:31 PM; A minority report is mentioned on the bill.
HB121 3086h: Representative Cordelli Support07:27:32.240 - 3:56:13 PM; Representative Cordelli explains the changes made to amendment 3086h based on discussions with DRA and others. Key changes include extending the audit timeframe to one year after the close of business, correcting a reference to be 309-B via a floor amendment, allowing the commissioner to levy fines and not consider unreserved funds, publishing the audit summary in the annual report and full audit on the website, referencing pupil transfers under statute 193:3 in the best interests of the child, removing the section on administrator's ability to cancel or renegotiate contracts, and amending to require independent auditors under 91-J instead of repealing 671:15.
HB121 3086h: Representative Cornell Oppose07:41:05.280 - 4:09:46 PM; Representative Cornell thanks Chair Cordelli for the positive changes in the amendment, noting it made the bill much better. However, they believe more improvements are needed and that audits are important but this bill is not the right vehicle to achieve them.
HB121 3086h: Committee Clerk Information Only07:41:05.280 - 4:09:46 PM; The committee clerk records the votes on adopting the amendment 3086h and on Ought to Pass with Amendment (OTPA) for HB 121, with 10 yes votes and 7 no votes in both cases.
HB121 3086h: Representative Murray Information Only07:44:09.040 - 4:12:50 PM; Representative Murray requests a minority report on HB 121.
HB121 3086h: Representative Murray Information Only07:44:09.040 - 4:12:50 PM; The speaker appreciates the committee's ability to disagree on most issues while maintaining cordiality, noting that disagreements are left behind after the meeting.

Noble, Kristin(Chairman)(R)[A+]2024	Drye, Margaret(Clerk)(R)[A-]2024	Peternel, Katy(V Chairman)(R)[A]2024
Cornell, Patricia(D)[CT]2024	Freeman, Lisa(R)[B+]2018	Hall, Muriel(D)[CT]2024
Terry, Paul(R)[A]2024	McDonnell, Valerie(R)[B+]2024	Selig, Loren(D)[CT]2024
Balboni, Peggy(D)[CT]2024	Murray, Megan(D)[CT]2024	Tenczar, Jeffrey(R)[B+]2024
Litchfield, Melissa(R)[A-]2022	Woodcock, Stephen(D)[CT]2024	Kluger, Lee Ann(D)
Snodgrass, Jim(D)	Nadeau, Brian(R)