Committee Summary for House Education Policy and Administration (01/22/2025)

Bill/Time	Type	Title	Sponsor
HB71 00:02:49.879 - 8:31:50 AM	Public Hearing	(Third New Title) prohibiting school facilities from being used to provide shelter for aliens; relative to department of health and human services contracts; and requiring the use of public notices before reassessment of property values for tax purposes.	Harvey-Bolia, Juliet(R)[A-]2025
HB440 01:00:43.119 - 9:29:44 AM	Public Hearing	relative to educator licensing.	Cordelli, Glenn(R)[B+]2025
HB384 01:32:22.159 - 10:01:23 AM	Public Hearing	prohibiting bullying in schools.	Leishman, Peter(D)[D-]2025
HB446 03:52:44.640 - 12:21:45 PM	Public Hearing	relative to parental notice for non-academic surveys in public schools.	Litchfield, Melissa(R)[B+]2025
HB415 04:52:04.878 - 1:21:05 PM	Public Hearing	removing requirements that schools provide menstrual products in restrooms.	Peternel, Katy(R)[A]2025
HB116 05:48:01.600 - 2:17:02 PM	Executive Session	relative to reporting requirements for public academies.	Edwards, Jess(R)[B+]2025
HB93 2024-043 05:53:54.680 - 2:22:55 PM	Executive Session	enabling school districts to appoint a school district treasurer.	Alexander, Joe(R)[A+]2025
HB184 06:08:38.558 - 2:37:39 PM	Executive Session	establishing a committee to study changing school start times.	Wheeler, Jonah(D)[D-]2025

HB71: Representative Juliet Harvey Bolia, representing Sullivan and Belmont in Belknap County Support00:02:49.879 - 8:31:50 AM; Representative Juliet Harvey Bolia introduced House Bill 71, which aims to prevent schools from being used as shelters for aliens who have not been admitted into the United States. She clarified that the bill does not ban or prohibit anything but sets conditions on state funding. Bolia mentioned that the bill was inspired by events in Brooklyn, New York, in 2024, where students were forced into remote learning while their school was used as an emergency shelter. She highlighted the negative impact of remote learning during the COVID-19 shutdown on students and families, emphasizing the need to avoid such situations. Bolia also referenced the use of Logan Airport as a shelter in Massachusetts, arguing that such uses are inappropriate and that governments should plan better for large populations. She explained that the bill allows for short-term emergency shelters for the general population and does not apply to schools housing non-student populations. Bolia addressed the fiscal note, stating that the bill does not create positions or require funding, but there was a methodology suggesting potential large losses, which she contested. She answered questions about the bill's applicability to vacant school district buildings, planning for sudden population movements, and potential impacts on other programs, asserting that the bill does not pose undue burdens or risks to funding.
HB71: Representative Kruger Information Only00:12:13.920 - 8:41:14 AM; Representative Kruger asked if the bill would include a school district building that was currently vacant and not used for educational purposes but still owned by the school district. Representative Bolia responded that it would not, as the building is not functioning as a school.
HB71: Representative Sally Information Only00:13:00.399 - 8:42:01 AM; Representative Sally inquired about the situation where Texas sent people to Martha's Vineyard without notification, questioning how states could plan in such scenarios. Representative Bolia responded that her bill focuses on not displacing one vulnerable population for another and that other solutions must be found, though she did not provide specific program designs.
HB71: Representative Cornell Information Only00:14:31.680 - 8:43:32 AM; Representative Cornell asked if Representative Bolia had heard of similar situations happening or possibly happening in New Hampshire. Bolia confirmed she had not but was concerned due to proximity to Massachusetts. She provided background information on New Hampshire's refugee resettlement statistics, emphasizing that these numbers are planned for and should not disrupt school systems.
HB71: Unnamed Representative Information Only00:17:41.960 - 8:46:42 AM; An unnamed representative asked about the potential impact of the bill on other programs related to immigration resettlement, such as human trafficking assistance and refugee programs. Representative Bolia stated that she found no evidence that the bill would put these programs at risk and questioned the validity of the fiscal note's methodology.
HB71: Representative Bon Information Only00:20:26.720 - 8:49:27 AM; Representative Bon asked if the bill would apply to schools when they are not in session, such as during breaks or summer. Representative Bolia responded that the bill would prohibit using schools for longer than 72 hours as shelters for alien populations during these times.
HB71: Representative Freeman Information Only00:21:23.200 - 8:50:24 AM; Representative Freeman responded to a question about the nature of the bill, classifying it as proactive rather than reactive. He explained that the bill aims to provide parents with assurance and peace of mind by setting a statutory framework to prevent schools from being used as emergency shelters for extended periods. He cited an example from New York where schools were repurposed, leading to public frustration over extended remote learning. Freeman emphasized the importance of setting time limits and guardrails for the use of municipal buildings for non-educational purposes.
HB71: Representative Hall Information Only00:23:12.720 - 8:52:13 AM; Representative Hall questioned the methodology used to estimate potential financial losses due to the bill, specifically addressing the figures of 12 to 18 million dollars. He sought clarification on whether the Department of Education (DOE) could confirm a potential loss of revenue, to which the response was that the DOE found the figure indeterminable. The discussion highlighted a lack of clear evidence linking state policies to financial losses and raised concerns about the accuracy of the cited figures.
HB71: Representative Woodcock Information Only00:28:39.240 - 8:57:40 AM; Representative Woodcock inquired if the bill would prevent schools from being used for housing during the summer, specifically when no students are present. The response clarified that the bill's intent is not to displace summer programs or camps, but if schools were turned into refugee shelters in the summer, it would violate the bill's provisions. This discussion aimed to clarify the bill's application during non-school periods.
HB71: Representative Freeman Information Only00:30:51.760 - 8:59:52 AM; Representative Freeman discussed the distinction between refugees and asylum seekers, explaining that refugees have been vetted and granted status, while asylum seekers are still in the process. He also mentioned concerns about crime related to migrant shelters in Massachusetts and a recent incident in Vermont involving a border patrol agent, emphasizing the complexities and potential risks associated with unknown populations.
HB71: Representative (Unnamed) Information Only00:33:58.399 - 9:02:59 AM; An unnamed representative clarified the definition of an asylum seeker as someone seeking protection from persecution and human rights violations, who has not yet been legally recognized as a refugee. This clarification was in response to the ongoing discussion about the terminology used in the context of the bill.
HB71: Jerry FW, New Hampshire Association of School Administrators Information Only00:34:30.560 - 9:03:31 AM; Jerry FW from the New Hampshire Association of School Administrators shared practical concerns about the bill's implementation. He discussed who would determine entry to emergency shelters in schools and the challenges of managing such shelters during extended power outages. He also raised questions about the bill's applicability to public charter schools and clarified that remote learning is no longer an option in New Hampshire for extended periods. His testimony highlighted the potential operational issues the bill could pose at the local level.
HB71: Unidentified Speaker Information Only00:38:27.920 - 9:07:28 AM; The speaker sought clarification on whether the bill would prevent the use of school building facilities during the summer if they were empty. The question was about the applicability of the bill throughout the year, and it was noted that the bill does not specifically address the summer period.
HB71: Representative Morris Information Only00:38:55.400 - 9:07:56 AM; Representative Morris inquired about the verification process for individuals seeking shelter in school facilities during natural disasters, specifically whether a driver's license or passport could be used to verify legal status. The question raised concerns about who would be responsible for this verification process, as it was not detailed in the bill.
HB440: Representative Glenn Cordelli, Tuftonboro, Wolfeboro, and Alton in the Lakes Region Support01:00:43.119 - 9:29:44 AM; Representative Cordelli introduced House Bill 440, which focuses on educator licensing. He mentioned previous discussions with Diana Fenton from the Department of Education about the need for specific rule-making in legislation. The bill, developed in collaboration with the department, specifies rules for licensing and importantly, allows CTE teachers with industry-recognized credentials to be exempt from certain tests. This exemption aims to encourage experienced tradespeople to teach in CTE centers. He highlighted the need for specificity in rule-making regarding educator licensing.
HB440: Representative Woodcock Information Only01:03:19.839 - 9:32:20 AM; Representative Woodcock asked about the professional education assessments mentioned in the bill, specifically whether they are stipulated by licensure or certificate and if they would need to be retaken upon license renewal if the tests change. The question was referred to a representative from the Department of Education for a more detailed answer.
HB440: Representative Selig Information Only01:04:07.640 - 9:33:08 AM; Representative Selig inquired about specific tests mentioned in the bill and how the bill relates to reciprocity with other states. These questions were also directed towards the Department of Education representative for clarification.
HB440: Stephen Appleby, Director, Department of Education Information Only01:04:54.240 - 9:33:55 AM; Stephen Appleby, Director at the Department of Education, provided technical support and answered questions related to the bill. He clarified that the licensure exams mentioned are for initial licensure only, not for renewals. He explained that if someone seeks a new endorsement, they would need to take a test, but not for license renewals. He also discussed the acceptance of exams from ETS or Pearson and how they relate to reciprocity with other states, such as accepting Massachusetts' MTEL exams if they meet New Hampshire's standards. He emphasized the importance of test comparability across states for licensing purposes and mentioned the stability and predictability the bill would bring to the testing requirements.
HB440: bbon Information Only01:09:16.000 - 9:38:17 AM; bbon inquired about the certification process for educators, specifically focusing on alternative pathways and the necessity of testing. They were informed that all paths to certification ultimately require testing, although alternative pathways exist for those with different backgrounds. The discussion included details on the basic academic skills test required for licensure and how certain scores, such as SAT scores at the 50th percentile or higher, could substitute for this test. The State Board of Education determines the passing scores based on national standards to ensure reciprocity across states.
HB440: Hall Information Only01:11:41.280 - 9:40:42 AM; Hall asked about the certification process for CTE (Career and Technical Education) teachers, specifically regarding exemptions from testing. They were informed that CTE teachers are currently exempt from testing if they hold an industry-recognized credential, and that the proposed legislation aims to codify this practice.
HB440: NATO Information Only01:12:08.600 - 9:41:09 AM; NATO inquired about the working conditions of CTE teachers, specifically whether they operate under the supervision of someone who has already passed the required tests. They were informed that CTE teachers can use industry-recognized credentials instead of standardized tests and typically have a mentor or a CTE director once in the classroom.
HB440: Bon Information Only01:13:40.480 - 9:42:41 AM; Bon asked about the certification tests required for different types of educators, specifically whether additional tests are needed for specialized roles like math or reading specialists. They were informed that all educators must pass a basic academic skills test, with further specialized tests required for specific endorsements.
HB440: Woodcock Information Only01:15:13.199 - 9:44:14 AM; Woodcock sought clarification on what qualifies as an acceptable industry-recognized credential for CTE educators. They were told that the state works closely with CTE directors to determine what credentials are acceptable, and that these credentials are broad and vary based on the individual's background and experience.
HB440: Freeman Information Only01:16:34.280 - 9:45:35 AM; Freeman asked if CTE instructors teach core classes such as language arts, math, or science. They were informed that CTE instructors are supposed to focus on teaching specific vocational skills, and administrative rules prevent them from teaching core classes, although enforcement varies.
HB384: lean Information Only01:32:22.159 - 10:01:23 AM; lean, the representative presenting House Bill 384, started by acknowledging the new role of the committee chairman and congratulated them on their appointment. The testimony was cut off before further details on the bill could be provided.
HB384: Peter Leechman, representing Peterborough and Sharon Support01:32:42.000 - 10:01:43 AM; Peter Leechman spoke in support of HB384, emphasizing that the bill aims to enhance existing laws on bullying by encouraging parental involvement without changing the current statute. He highlighted the need for a tool that would prompt parents to discuss remediation activities with schools when their child is involved in bullying incidents. Leechman also mentioned receiving feedback from various organizations, including an attorney from the disability community, indicating the impact of bullying on this group. He referenced written testimony from Lisa Walker, a former superintendent of schools in Peterborough, now in Grantham, who also wrote an op-ed on the issue.
HB384: Representative Terry Information Only01:35:04.880 - 10:04:05 AM; Representative Terry asked about the specifics of the 'bullying officer' mentioned in the bill, questioning the professional credentials and training required, and whether this position would be filled by existing staff or require new hires. He sought clarification on whether the role's specifics would be determined by school boards.
HB384: Peter Leechman, representing Peterborough and Sharon Support01:35:51.880 - 10:04:52 AM; In response to Representative Terry, Peter Leechman clarified that the bullying officer is already a part of existing statutes and typically appointed by school boards, often being the school resource officer. He noted that the specifics of credentialing and training are left to the discretion of each school board, aligning with current practices.
HB384: Representative Bon Information Only01:37:43.520 - 10:06:44 AM; Representative Bon inquired about the consultation process with existing school district bullying policies. Peter Leechman responded that he had only consulted with Lisa Walker, the person who prompted him to file the legislation, and had not discussed it with other school districts.
HB384: Representative Freeman Information Only01:38:32.480 - 10:07:33 AM; Representative Freeman asked about the current bullying interventions and evidence-based methods. Peter Leechman admitted he did not have detailed knowledge or statistics on these topics.
HB384: Representative Morris Information Only01:39:10.440 - 10:08:11 AM; Representative Morris raised concerns about the potential judicial escalation of school issues due to the bill's requirement for a bullying officer to file a CHINS petition upon an incident. He also questioned the authority of the bill in mandating parental classes and the safeguards to ensure parental attendance. Peter Leechman responded that such petitions are already common and emphasized the importance of parental involvement, though he acknowledged there would be no legal repercussions for non-attendance, just encouragement.
HB384: Representative Murray Information Only01:41:20.679 - 10:10:21 AM; Representative Murray pointed out existing statutes that already require educational programs for bullying, to which Peter Leechman confirmed his awareness.
HB384: Representative S Information Only01:41:48.960 - 10:10:49 AM; Representative S questioned the effectiveness of the classes listed in the bill for changing behavior related to bullying. They asked how attending these classes would help parents address bullying issues. The response suggested that more information could lead to better decision-making and potentially help address bullying, though it was not a definitive answer.
HB384: Karen Rosenberg, Disability Rights Center Oppose01:43:18.800 - 10:12:19 AM; Karen Rosenberg, Policy Director at the Disability Rights Center, spoke in opposition to HB384. She expressed concerns about the bill's impact on children with disabilities, who may be victims or accused of bullying. Rosenberg highlighted existing laws and resources that schools use to address bullying and noted the challenges schools face in engaging parents. She argued that the bill does not address these issues effectively and could lead to more children being pushed into the juvenile justice system rather than receiving education on school community expectations. She recommended not passing the bill.
HB384: Unnamed Committee Member Information Only01:48:42.800 - 10:17:43 AM; An unnamed committee member raised concerns about cyberbullying and its severe impacts, referencing a personal anecdote of a child's suicide due to bullying. They inquired about any proactive measures in New Hampshire to address bullying, to which Rosenberg responded that the Department of Education receives bullying reports but is not aware of specific efforts to target districts with high bullying rates.
HB384: Susan Laraby, General Counsel and Legislative Liaison, DCF Information Only01:50:28.440 - 10:19:29 AM; Susan Laraby from the Department of Children and Families (DCF) introduced herself and Amy McCormack, who would provide information on the changes to the child in need of services statute. Laraby clarified the fiscal note and outlined the juvenile justice system, including delinquency and child in need of services (CHINS). She explained that the bill would add a new definition to CHINS for acts of bullying, which could increase the number of cases handled by DCF.
HB384: Amy McCormack, Juvenile Justice Administrator Associate Bureau Chief, DCF Information Only01:51:13.639 - 10:20:14 AM; Amy McCormack provided details on the process following a referral to DCF under the existing CHINS statute. She explained the voluntary services assessment, the potential refusal by the child or parent, and the subsequent court proceedings if a petition is filed. She highlighted the roles of juvenile probation and parole officers in managing these cases and the possible outcomes, including probation and ongoing case management.
HB384: Unidentified Speaker Information Only01:56:46.560 - 10:25:47 AM; The speaker inquires about the necessity of appointing a guardian ad litem for children involved in the juvenile justice system, specifically in cases of CHINS (Child in Need of Services). They ask if there is a requirement under the current statutes for such an appointment. The response clarifies that there is no such requirement under the Juvenile Justice statutes for a guardian ad litem to be appointed in CHINS cases.
HB384: Unidentified Speaker Information Only01:57:32.920 - 10:26:33 AM; The speaker raises a concern about the lack of mention of mental health services and counseling alternatives to justice system involvement for youngsters. They question if there are interventions available before a petition is filed, to which it is explained that a voluntary assessment using the Child Adolescent Needs and Strengths tool is offered. This assessment leads to recommendations for services such as counseling or mental health agency involvement, but participation is voluntary.
HB384: Unidentified Speaker Information Only01:58:18.760 - 10:27:19 AM; The speaker confirms the voluntary nature of the services recommended after the assessment and notes that Juvenile Justice has undergone significant transformation over the last five years to embrace prevention services and community-based supports as first-line interventions. They clarify that both the parent and child must agree to participate in the services, and if they do not, the child may move into the judicial system.
HB384: Unidentified Speaker Information Only02:00:54.440 - 10:29:55 AM; The speaker questions if the bill would bypass community-based interventions and directly lead to a CHINS petition. They highlight a section of the current CHINS statute that requires school districts to have sought educational approaches and engaged parents before seeking court intervention. They emphasize that court should be a last resort, especially given the efforts to prevent children from entering the court system.
HB384: Unidentified Speaker Information Only02:02:28.360 - 10:31:29 AM; The speaker notes that the bill does not specify the age of the child involved in CHINS or delinquency cases, which already cover violations, misdemeanors, or felonies, including bullying-related offenses like criminal threatening or harassment. They mention that there have been 448 CHINS referrals by school districts, mostly related to truancy.
HB384: Nancy Beerman, New Boston Oppose02:04:14.800 - 10:33:15 AM; Nancy Beerman from New Boston opposes HB384, expressing concern about students being put into the juvenile detention system due to bullying. She mentions that her school district (SAU19) has a comprehensive policy (JIC) that effectively addresses bullying and involves parents. She believes the bill is unnecessary as school districts are managing the issue well.
HB384: Diana Fenton, Department of Education Information Only02:06:50.440 - 10:35:51 AM; Diana Fenton, an attorney with the Department of Education, explains the department's limited role in bullying incidents, which involves coordinating with school districts to ensure they have compliant policies and acting as an informal mediator. She discusses annual reports on bullying and restraint and seclusion, noting that the department reviews these numbers for trends and abnormalities, reaching out to schools if necessary.
HB384: Becky Wilson, New Hampshire School Boards Association Information Only02:14:52.880 - 10:43:53 AM; Becky Wilson, from the New Hampshire School Boards Association, discusses the required policy JIC, which addresses bullying, investigation, and reporting. She explains that while every incident reported as bullying may not be founded, schools are required to have policies in place. The association does not take a position on HB384 but emphasizes the importance of parental involvement in addressing student issues.
HB384: Representative Melissa Witfield, Brentwood/Fremont/Danville Support03:34:42.160 - 12:03:43 PM; Representative Witfield introduced the bill, explaining its origin from a constituent request. The bill aims to modify the notification process for non-academic surveys in public schools. Currently, parents receive a 10-day notice and an opt-in for such surveys. The bill proposes that instead of just providing a link, the actual survey should be attached to the email for parents to review immediately. She also mentioned an upcoming amendment to change the CDC Youth Risk Assessment Survey from an opt-out to an opt-in, aiming to ensure parents can discuss the importance of the survey with their children.
HB384: Representative Woodcock Information Only03:37:33.239 - 12:06:34 PM; Representative Woodcock expressed concerns about the amendment proposed by Representative Witfield, noting that it significantly alters the original bill. He worried that the amendment might not allow sufficient time for public and organizational feedback, suggesting a need for further dialogue.
HB384: Representative Murray Information Only03:39:32.560 - 12:08:33 PM; Representative Murray sought clarification on whether the term 'academic survey' in the bill could include routine school functions like lunch requests. There was confusion about whether the amendment or the original bill was being discussed, and Representative Witfield clarified that the amendment removed specific lines from the bill.
HB384: Representative Henry Gon, Hillsborough 29th District, Goffstown Support03:42:21.800 - 12:11:22 PM; As a co-sponsor, Representative Gon emphasized the importance of parental notification and transparency in public schools regarding non-academic surveys. He argued that parents, being legally responsible for their children, should be informed about all surveys to ensure they can provide necessary care and support.
HB384: Representative Morris Information Only03:43:54.680 - 12:12:55 PM; Representative Morris inquired if surveys about school lunches would be exempt from the bill, given the bill's focus on eliciting personal information. Representative Gon responded that while such surveys might not be relevant to the bill, he saw no reason to withhold them from parents if they concerned specific dietary needs.
HB384: Representative Sik Information Only03:45:28.600 - 12:14:29 PM; Representative Sik discussed the application of the bill to non-academic surveys used in academic contexts, such as sociology class projects. Representative Gon advised that such surveys, when used outside the specific classroom, should be shared with parents to avoid potential issues.
HB384: Nancy Beerman, New Boston Support03:46:59.880 - 12:16:00 PM; Nancy Beerman expressed support for the bill but emphasized the need for stricter enforcement. She shared her experience with Right-to-Know requests revealing that schools were still administering surveys without parental consent. She suggested more training and stricter regulations to ensure compliance and protect student privacy.
HB446: Ann Marie Banfield, Parental Rights Advocate Support03:52:44.640 - 12:21:45 PM; Amry Banfield, a long-time advocate for parental rights in education, supports HB446. She has been involved with education for 15 years and was part of the original law's creation. Banfield argues for expanding the law to include the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), citing past incidents where students were asked sensitive questions by for-profit vendors without parental consent. She highlighted a case in Bedford where a parent was shocked to learn about the survey content, which led to concerns about privacy and data security. Banfield emphasized the need for parental consent for such surveys, critiquing the current notification system as insufficient. She also mentioned past legislative discussions and referenced testimony from a medical professional about the YRBS's lack of IRB approval, suggesting it lacks scientific validity. Banfield stressed the importance of respecting parental choices and protecting student privacy.
HB446: Jam Wilder, Campton, New Hampshire Support04:00:44.040 - 12:29:45 PM; Jam Wilder from Campton supports the bill, sharing a personal experience where her children were given the Youth Risk Assessment Survey without proper notification. She recounted a distressing incident where her children were horrified by the survey's content, which included questions about suicide that she believes could be harmful to vulnerable students. Following the survey, there was a suicide in their district, which she linked to the survey's influence. Wilder argued that the survey should require an opt-in approach to protect children from potentially damaging information and to allow parents to guide their children's exposure to such topics.
HB446: Emma Savini, New Futures Oppose04:04:05.439 - 12:33:06 PM; Emma Savini, the Children's Behavioral Health Policy Coordinator at New Futures, opposes the amendment to HB446 that would remove the exception for the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS). She emphasized the importance of the data collected from the YRBS for informing mental health and other interventions in schools. Savini argued that changing to an opt-in system would significantly reduce participation and the reliability of the data, impacting the effectiveness of targeted programs. She also mentioned past instances where similar bills were discussed, highlighting the value of student input on the survey's impact.
HB446: Jo Cholo, Division of Public Health Services Information Only04:10:08.399 - 12:39:09 PM; Jo Cholo from the Division of Public Health Services provided information about the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), which New Hampshire has used since 1993. Cholo explained the survey's administration in odd years, its electronic and paper formats, and the measures taken to ensure student anonymity. They highlighted the importance of the opt-out approach for maintaining sufficient participation and data reliability. Cholo also discussed the survey's broad topics, including mental health, sexual behavior, and injury safety, and its role in tracking trends and informing public health strategies. They emphasized the need for a high participation rate to generate meaningful statistical analyses.
HB446: Murray, Representative Information Only04:21:20.399 - 12:50:21 PM; Representative Murray inquired about the regional variation in the use of data collected from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS). They asked whether the results influence regional prevention programs, indicating a need for more detailed information on how data is used across different regions and programs in New Hampshire.
HB446: Jo Cholo, Division of Public Health Services Information Only04:10:08.399 - 12:39:09 PM; Jo Cholo discussed the use of YRBS data, mentioning that while they are not the best person to detail how the data is used, it supports various programs and public health regions in New Hampshire. They noted that schools and local communities use this data to tailor prevention efforts related to tobacco use, sexual behavior, and mental health. The Department also publishes resources on their website to support students and the general public.
HB446: Balon, Representative Information Only04:24:08.640 - 12:53:09 PM; Representative Balon raised concerns about student data privacy and the security of the data collected by YRBS. They questioned the measures in place to ensure data safety, particularly in light of previous data breaches.
HB446: Jo Cholo, Division of Public Health Services Information Only04:24:08.640 - 12:53:09 PM; Jo Cholo responded to Representative Balon's concerns about data privacy, explaining that the YRBS is anonymous and does not collect personal information. They detailed the use of HIPAA-compliant software for electronic surveys and the randomization of school and classroom IDs to maintain privacy. They also discussed the security measures for both electronic and paper surveys, including the requirement for at least five students to be present during survey administration.
HB446: Freeman, Representative Information Only04:32:36.960 - 1:01:37 PM; Representative Freeman asked about the duration of YRBS administration in New Hampshire and the mechanism for alerting parents if survey results indicate specific problems with students. They expressed concern over the anonymous nature of the survey and the lack of direct parental notification in cases of individual student issues.
HB446: Jo Cholo, Division of Public Health Services Information Only04:32:36.960 - 1:01:37 PM; Jo Cholo responded to Representative Freeman's questions, stating that the YRBS has been administered in New Hampshire since 1993 and will be solely managed by DHHS starting in 2025. They explained that the survey's anonymity prevents direct parental alerts for individual issues, but the data can help schools and communities address broader trends, such as increased mental health concerns.
HB446: Celik, Representative Information Only04:36:35.000 - 1:05:36 PM; Representative Celik asked whether the survey data could be used to allocate school budgets for mental health support based on identified trends. They emphasized the importance of community outreach and parental education in addressing issues highlighted by the survey data.
HB446: Jo Cholo, Division of Public Health Services Information Only04:36:35.000 - 1:05:36 PM; Jo Cholo confirmed that the YRBS data can indeed be used by schools and communities to allocate resources for mental health support and other programs, provided there is a sufficient sample size for statistical analysis.
HB446: Aubrey Freedman, Bridgewater private citizen Support04:38:09.599 - 1:07:10 PM; Aubrey Freedman expressed support for the bill, criticizing the YRBS for being too intrusive and time-consuming, especially when academic proficiency rates are low. They highlighted specific questions from the survey, arguing that they are too personal and that the data is used to justify hiring more staff rather than focusing on academics. They suggested that parental consent should be opt-in rather than opt-out and that notifications about the survey should be more prominent.
HB446: Murray, Representative Information Only04:44:33.638 - 1:13:34 PM; Representative Murray confirmed with Aubrey Freedman that notifications about the YRBS are typically sent at the beginning of the school year, but suggested that such important surveys should have separate and more noticeable notifications.
HB446: Wock, Representative Information Only04:45:24.638 - 1:14:25 PM; Representative Wock asked Aubrey Freedman who 'they' referred to in their testimony. Freedman clarified that 'they' refers to school administrators and school board members who support expanding school staff to address issues identified by the YRBS.
HB446: Becky Wilson, New Hampshire School Boards Association Information Only04:46:20.200 - 1:15:21 PM; Becky Wilson from the New Hampshire School Boards Association provided information on current practices related to the YRBS. She explained that the association has a resolution supporting opt-in for surveys and highlighted the burden of an opt-in requirement on districts. She noted that all survey questions are published on the DHHS website with rationales and references, and that most districts share YRBS results at school board meetings. She clarified that the middle school YRBS is locally funded, unlike the state-funded high school survey.
HB446: Jess Edwards, Representative, Rockingham District 31 (Auburn, Chester, Candia, Deerfield) Support04:49:42.920 - 1:18:43 PM; Representative Jess Edwards, a former certified information privacy professional, supported the bill, arguing for the ethical necessity of an opt-in approach to data collection. They emphasized their efforts to change the legislature's culture from opt-out to opt-in to protect personal data.
HB415: Katie Pell, Representative, Carroll District 6 (Wolfeboro, Tuftonboro) Support04:52:04.878 - 1:21:05 PM; Representative Katie Pell presented HB415, which seeks to repeal RSA 189:16-a due to it being an unfunded mandate. They argued that while they have no issue with providing menstrual products, the state should not mandate such programs without funding them, as per the New Hampshire Constitution. They suggested that the current statute could be amended from 'shall' to 'may' to make it optional for school districts. They also responded to a public inquiry about the fiscal implications, suggesting that schools would likely continue providing the products even if the bill passed.
HB415: Dve, Representative Information Only04:55:16.320 - 1:24:17 PM; Representative Dve asked about the potential fiscal impact if the state had to fund the provision of menstrual products. Representative Pell responded that they did not have specific figures but suggested that schools already fund this in their budgets.
HB415: Bon, Representative Information Only04:56:08.878 - 1:25:09 PM; Representative Bon inquired whether any school districts had expressed opposition to the current law or had issues with it. Representative Pell stated they had not heard from any districts with such concerns.
HB415: CK, Representative Information Only04:56:54.440 - 1:25:55 PM; Representative CK asked if Representative Pell had any information on the current costs to districts for providing menstrual products. Pell responded that they did not have specific cost data but suggested that constituents could check with their school districts.
HB415: Freeman Information Only04:57:13.600 - 1:26:14 PM; Freeman briefly mentioned that Representative Edwards would address a question about the financial aspects of the bill next.
HB415: Unnamed Speaker Information Only04:57:29.440 - 1:26:30 PM; The speaker inquired about the existence of other unfunded mandates in legislation, expressing curiosity if this was the only one. The response indicated that it was unlikely to be the only unfunded mandate and noted that this particular issue reoccurs frequently.
HB415: Unnamed Speaker Information Only04:57:59.840 - 1:27:00 PM; The speaker referenced Article 28a concerning unfunded mandates and questioned the interpretation of funding responsibilities between state and local municipalities. It was clarified that the mandate could be funded by either the state or local political subdivision.
HB415: Jess Edwards, Representative from Rockingham District 31 (Auburn, Candia, Chester, Deerfield) Support05:00:24.240 - 1:29:25 PM; Representative Edwards, a co-sponsor of HB415, supported the bill to address an unfunded mandate regarding menstrual hygiene products in schools. He explained that his initial bill was pulled in favor of HB415, which was supported by his school board and principal Lori Collins from Auburn Village School. Edwards criticized the current law for both mandating the provision of menstrual products by school districts while prohibiting state funding, seeing it as a violation of the New Hampshire Constitution. He suggested amending the bill to change 'shall' to 'may' or remove the offensive sentence entirely. He also mentioned a prior fiscal note of his bill that estimated $550,000 annually for state funding and urged the committee to address this and other unfunded mandates.
HB415: Devin Quinn, New Hampshire Women's Foundation Oppose05:07:48.718 - 1:36:49 PM; Devin Quinn from the New Hampshire Women's Foundation opposed HB415, which seeks to repeal the mandate for schools to provide menstrual products. She provided background on the original bill from 2019, highlighting its significance as an initiative from a high school student, Caroline Dylan, and its endorsement by Governor Sununu as promoting equality and dignity. Quinn emphasized the positive impact of the law, noting no state has repealed similar laws and citing a 2024 poll showing strong public support for such provisions. She countered arguments about costs and misuse, presenting letters from school administrators and students that supported the existing law. She argued that removing the mandate would lead to missed school time and increased stigma for students, advocating for continued support for the law.
HB415: Abigail Banner, Student Oppose05:17:48.000 - 1:46:49 PM; Abigail Banner, a seventh-grade student at a private school, shared her personal experience regarding the lack of menstrual products at her school. She described the challenges she faces due to not being able to carry a backpack, having to keep supplies in a distant locker, and the strict monitoring of students' movements outside the classroom. She highlighted a specific instance where she had to use toilet paper as a substitute due to time constraints and the absence of a full-time nurse at her school. Abigail expressed that while the repeal of the bill might not directly affect her, she empathizes with public school students who would be impacted.
HB415: Sharon McCarthy, Girls Inc New Hampshire, Bedford Oppose05:20:49.000 - 1:49:50 PM; Sharon McCarthy, CEO of Girls Inc New Hampshire and resident of Bedford, opposed HB415, emphasizing the importance of providing free menstrual products in schools. She discussed the organization's efforts to combat period poverty through their period pantry and highlighted the emotional and educational impacts on girls who cannot afford these products. McCarthy referenced statistics on missed class time due to lack of access and urged the committee to vote inexpedient to legislate on HB415 to maintain the current policy.
HB415: Rachel Glansberg, Student, Dartmouth, Period Youth Advisory Council Oppose05:30:20.878 - 1:59:21 PM; Rachel Glansberg, a student at Dartmouth and member of Period's Youth Advisory Council, spoke against the repeal of the bill requiring free menstrual products in schools. She shared her high school experience in New Jersey, where she advocated for similar legislation, noting its positive impact on attendance and student well-being. Glansberg stressed the importance of addressing period poverty and the health and dignity of students, urging the committee to support the current law.
HB415: Mike Appleberg, United Way of Greater Nashua Oppose05:33:23.280 - 2:02:24 PM; Mike Appleberg from United Way of Greater Nashua opposed HB415, emphasizing the necessity of menstrual products for student success. He discussed the challenges faced by students without access to these products, including missed school days and health risks. Appleberg highlighted the lack of coverage for these products by social safety net programs and the minimal cost compared to the benefits. He urged the committee to vote inexpedient to legislate and maintain the current law.
HB116: Representative Freeman Information Only05:48:01.600 - 2:17:02 PM; Representative Freeman made a motion to recommend HB116 as inexpedient to legislate, which was seconded by Representative Terry. The motion was related to reporting requirements for public academies.
HB116: Representative Hall Information Only05:48:57.080 - 2:17:58 PM; Representative Hall supported the motion to recommend HB116 as inexpedient to legislate, citing a letter from Cole Brown indicating that public academies receive no state funding and suggesting that it does not make sense to hold them to the reporting requirements.
HB116: Representative S Information Only05:49:42.160 - 2:18:43 PM; Representative S encouraged public academies to collaborate and address their issues with provider schools directly, suggesting that the problem could be solved without state legislation.
HB116: Representative S Information Only05:49:42.160 - 2:18:43 PM; Representative S was finishing speaking at 05:49:42.160, just before the snippet provided, and did not continue in this section.
HB116: Co Brown Information Only05:50:34.400 - 2:19:35 PM; Co Brown mentioned that their town's contract stipulates the information they receive about students, describing it as a well-oiled machine that works for them.
HB116: Madam Clerk Information Only05:51:29.400 - 2:20:30 PM; Madam Clerk conducted a roll call vote, with numerous representatives voting yes, resulting in a unanimous decision with no nays and one non-voting member.
HB116: Representative Lichfield Information Only05:52:16.958 - 2:21:17 PM; Representative Lichfield proposed moving to the next bill, HB93, which enables school districts to appoint a school district Treasurer. They suggested adding an amendment to pass it as amended.
HB116: Representative Terry Information Only05:53:03.200 - 2:22:04 PM; Representative Terry seconded the motion to pass the amendment and asked if they should share the amendment now or wait.
HB116: Representative Lichfield Support05:53:54.680 - 2:22:55 PM; Representative Lichfield explained that HB93 is enabling legislation to change the school district Treasurer from an elected to an appointed position. They proposed an amendment to require a 3/5ths vote for changing the position to appointed, and a simple majority to revert back to an elected position if desired.
HB116: Representative Morris Information Only05:54:40.680 - 2:23:41 PM; Representative Morris seconded the amendment proposed by Representative Lichfield.
HB116: Representative Woodcock Oppose05:55:26.400 - 2:24:27 PM; Representative Woodcock expressed concern about taking away the right of voters to elect their Treasurer, feeling uncomfortable with the proposed change to an appointed position and questioning the necessity of a 60% vote threshold.
HB116: Representative M Information Only05:56:11.718 - 2:25:12 PM; Representative M clarified the changes in the amendment to HB93, confirming a 3/5ths requirement to pass the warrant article and a simple majority to undo the change.
HB116: Representative Cornell Information Only05:57:23.478 - 2:26:24 PM; Representative Cornell sought clarification on whether the 3/5ths vote requirement applied to voters who show up or the entire eligible voting population. They also questioned whether the decision to revert to an elected position was made by the voters or the school board.
HB116: Representative Hall Information Only06:04:36.200 - 2:33:37 PM; Representative Hall asked if the term 'any school district' in the bill refers back to the definition in the first sentence, which excludes cooperative school districts.
HB116: Becky Wilson, New Hampshire School Boards Association Information Only06:03:04.360 - 2:32:05 PM; Becky Wilson clarified that most warrant articles require a simple majority unless they involve finances or bonds, which require a 60% vote. She confirmed that 'any school district' refers to the voters of the school district, not the school district entity itself.
HB116: Representative Bon Information Only06:08:38.558 - 2:37:39 PM; Representative Bon suggested holding over HB184, a bill to study changing school start times, due to questions about the language in the duties section and the composition of the study committee, which was limited to legislators.
HB116: Representative Information Only06:10:11.200 - 2:39:12 PM; A representative pointed out the difference between a commission and a committee, suggesting that a study committee might be more flexible and quicker to convene than a commission.
HB93 2024-043: Representative Lichfield Support05:53:54.680 - 2:22:55 PM; Representative Lichfield proposed an amendment to HB93, suggesting a 3/5ths vote requirement for changing the school district Treasurer from an elected to an appointed position, and a simple majority to revert back if desired.
HB93 2024-043: Representative Morris Information Only05:54:40.680 - 2:23:41 PM; Representative Morris seconded the amendment proposed by Representative Lichfield.
HB93 2024-043: Representative Woodcock Oppose05:55:26.400 - 2:24:27 PM; Representative Woodcock expressed concerns about changing the Treasurer's position from elected to appointed, feeling it takes away voters' rights and questioned the high threshold of a 60% vote.
HB93 2024-043: Representative M Information Only05:56:11.718 - 2:25:12 PM; Representative M sought clarification on the amendment's changes, confirming a 3/5ths requirement to pass and a simple majority to undo the change.
HB93 2024-043: Representative Cornell Information Only05:57:23.478 - 2:26:24 PM; Representative Cornell asked for clarification on the 3/5ths vote requirement and whether the decision to revert to an elected position was made by voters or the school board.
HB93 2024-043: Representative Hall Information Only06:04:36.200 - 2:33:37 PM; Representative Hall questioned the definition of 'any school district' in the bill, asking if it refers back to the first sentence's definition excluding cooperative school districts.
HB93 2024-043: Becky Wilson, New Hampshire School Boards Association Information Only06:03:04.360 - 2:32:05 PM; Becky Wilson clarified that most warrant articles require a simple majority unless they involve finances or bonds, and confirmed that 'any school district' refers to the voters of the school district.
HB184: Representative Bon Information Only06:08:38.558 - 2:37:39 PM; Representative Bon suggested holding over HB184 due to questions about the language in the duties section and the composition of the study committee, which was limited to legislators.
HB184: Representative Information Only06:10:11.200 - 2:39:12 PM; A representative pointed out the difference between a commission and a committee, suggesting that a study committee might be more flexible and quicker to convene than a commission.

Noble, Kristin(Chairman)(R)[A+]2025	Drye, Margaret(Clerk)(R)[B+]2025	Peternel, Katy(V Chairman)(R)[A]2025
Cornell, Patricia(D)[F]2025	Freeman, Lisa(R)[B+]2025	Belcher, Mike(R)[B+]2025
Hall, Muriel(D)[CT]2025	Terry, Paul(R)[B+]2025	McDonnell, Valerie(R)[B+]2025
Selig, Loren(D)[D-]2025	Balboni, Peggy(D)[CT]2025	Murray, Megan(D)[CT]2025
Tenczar, Jeffrey(R)[B+]2025	Litchfield, Melissa(R)[B+]2025	Woodcock, Stephen(D)[F]2025
Kluger, Lee Ann(D)[F]2025	Snodgrass, Jim(D)[F]2025	Nadeau, Brian(R)[B+]2025