Committee Summary for House Education Funding (01/28/2025)

Bill/Time	Type	Title	Sponsor
HB651 00:04:11.159 - 9:03:12 AM	Public Hearing	modifying the base cost and differential aid costs of an adequate education.	Luneau, David(D)[CT]2025
HB583 01:00:40.680 - 9:59:41 AM	Public Hearing	relative to state participation in the Medicaid direct certification program for free and reduced price school meals.	Telerski, Laura(D)[CT]2025
HB646 03:08:16.479 - 12:07:17 PM	Public Hearing	requiring school districts to establish an online application for participation in the free and reduced price meal program.	Telerski, Laura(D)[CT]2025
HB703 04:16:58.239 - 1:15:59 PM	Public Hearing	relative to prohibiting school districts from denying meals to students with unpaid meal balances, and making an appropriation therefor.	Damon, Hope(D)[CT]2025
HB656 04:24:06.439 - 1:23:07 PM	Public Hearing	relative to the authority of local school districts to accept federal grants.	Peternel, Katy(R)[A]2025
HB716 05:06:45.558 - 2:05:46 PM	Public Hearing	making an appropriation for the dual and concurrent enrollment program.	Ladd, Rick(R)[B+]2025

HB651: Dave Luno, representing the people of Hopkinton and Bow Support00:04:11.159 - 9:03:12 AM; Representative Dave Luno introduced House Bill 651, which modifies the base cost and differentiated cost of an adequate education. He explained that HB651 is part of a series of school funding bills, building on the previous House Bill 550, by increasing the base cost of an adequate education based on the Claremont lawsuit and also increasing the differentiated aid costs to address equity and fairness for both taxpayers and students. Luno highlighted the importance of recognizing additional educational costs based on student characteristics such as special education, students from low-income backgrounds measured by participation in the free and reduced-price lunch program, and English language learners. He noted the challenges faced by districts like Manchester with high numbers of English language learners and emphasized the need for equitable funding. Luno detailed the fiscal impact of the bill, which would increase the state share of school funding significantly, aiming to provide relief for property taxpayers without increasing overall spending on public schools. He expressed hope for further work sessions to refine and enhance the school funding bills.
HB651: Unnamed Representative Information Only00:15:34.199 - 9:14:35 AM; The representative asked Representative Luno about scientific studies demonstrating that educating low-income students is more expensive. Luno confirmed the existence of such studies, referencing a report and research papers available on the School Funding Commission's website hosted by the University of New Hampshire. The representative also inquired about the maximum number of years a school district should be funded to help a student become proficient in English, to which Luno responded that he was not an expert in that area but appreciated the question.
HB651: Unnamed Representative Information Only00:17:07.640 - 9:16:08 AM; The representative questioned why the greatest amount of differentiated aid is allocated to free and reduced lunch rather than special education, given its higher costs. Luno explained that the scaling factor from the base to the Claremont base was applied to existing differentiated aid factors, maintaining the current proportion. The representative also sought clarification on whether the state grants are calculated based on residency or enrollment, to which Luno clarified that they are based on average daily membership in residence (ADMR).
HB651: Representative Burton Information Only00:18:38.000 - 9:17:39 AM; Representative Burton related the testimony to previous discussions about the preparedness of students from lower-income towns, asking if the need for developmental courses at community colleges supports the need for adequate secondary education funding. Luno agreed, highlighting the strong correlation between student outcomes and family income, as well as overall school funding in those districts, and mentioned that the current funding formula recognizes the need for additional funding for students from low-income backgrounds.
HB651: Zach Shen, Executive Director of the New Hampshire School Funding Fairness Project Support00:20:53.039 - 9:19:54 AM; Zach Shen expressed support for House Bill 651, emphasizing its role in building upon House Bill 550 by adding differentiated aid categories. He provided context on New Hampshire's education funding, noting that 70% of education spending comes from local property taxes, the highest in the country, while the state's share is the lowest at less than 20%. Shen explained the significant gap between the state's adequacy funding and actual district expenditures, impacting local property tax rates. He cited examples of disparities in tax rates and expenditures between Kingston and Hampton, advocating for HB651 to address these inequities. Shen also mentioned the lack of data-driven differentiated aid costs currently in place and encouraged reviewing the Claremont lawsuit's rationale for proposed numbers. He stressed that the bill aims to shift the funding burden from local taxpayers to the state without increasing overall costs and highlighted significant public support for similar bills.
HB651: Unnamed Representative Information Only00:27:01.760 - 9:26:02 AM; The representative, also a school board member, expressed frustration about New Hampshire's low state funding for education and asked where HB651 would place the state in terms of state share funding if passed. Zach Shen responded that it would move the state from last to somewhere in the middle, though he did not have exact data at hand.
HB651: Papovich Information Only00:27:58.679 - 9:26:59 AM; Papovich discusses the intent of HB651, stating that the bill aims to increase the state's share of school funding. They express uncertainty about the exact actions of every school district but suggest that many could use the additional funding to provide property tax relief to their communities. Papovich also addresses the issue of differentiated aid, explaining that the current numbers are not based on actual costs or linked to specific data from studies or commissions, but rather a result of negotiation. They advocate for a more data-driven approach to determine the funding needs for different categories of students, suggesting a need for a more equitable funding model based on actual costs.
HB651: Damon Information Only00:32:32.440 - 9:31:33 AM; Damon discusses the impact of the current small percentage of state funding for public schools on the quality of education across districts. They highlight that communities with lower property values struggle more with funding due to the heavy reliance on local property taxes. This results in challenges in passing budget increases and funding schools, which directly affects the quality of education, including the number of AP classes, teacher turnover rates, teacher salaries, and the number of sports teams. Damon emphasizes the clear connection between funding and the opportunities available to students, including the condition of school buildings.
HB651: Unnamed Representative Information Only00:34:44.000 - 9:33:45 AM; An unnamed representative asks if there is a direct correlation between student achievement and expenditure per student. They reference a 1985 study suggesting such a link. The response confirms that there is indeed a connection, with a more significant impact for students from lower income families or those with additional needs. The speaker acknowledges that while the impact may diminish at higher spending levels or for high-achieving students, the overall evidence supports the notion that increased funding does positively affect student outcomes.
HB651: Unnamed Representative Information Only00:36:01.440 - 9:35:02 AM; Another unnamed representative seeks clarification on whether the link between spending per student and educational outcomes is a correlation or causation, and requests studies to support the claim of causation. The response indicates a belief in causation, with an offer to provide a report by the Education Law Center that supports the idea that money matters in education, particularly for students with greater needs.
HB651: Unnamed Representative Information Only00:36:51.040 - 9:35:52 AM; An unnamed representative raises the issue of including a minimum teacher salary in school funding, citing the example of some districts using low starting salaries as a 'training ground' for new teachers who then leave for better-paying positions elsewhere. The response acknowledges the complexity of such a policy, intersecting with collective bargaining and local control, but recognizes the significant impact of teacher salaries on education quality and suggests exploring this idea.
HB651: Unnamed Representative Information Only00:38:22.480 - 9:37:23 AM; An unnamed representative inquires about the state's role in inspecting school buildings and whether the costs of such inspections are included in the state's funding to schools. The response indicates that the Department of Education (DOE) and the State Board are responsible for such inspections and suggests waiting for a representative from DOE to provide a detailed answer.
HB651: Brian, Department of Education Bureau of School Finance Information Only00:39:40.319 - 9:38:41 AM; Brian from the Department of Education Bureau of School Finance provided a memo detailing the fiscal impact analysis for HB651. The memo summarized the changes in rates and the impact on Adequate Education Aid, Charter Aid, and EFA Aid. He mentioned that the analysis was done without considering interactions with other bills and was purely focused on the impact of HB651 on state funding. He was open to answering any questions related to the fiscal note or other aspects of the bill.
HB583: Laura Tersi, Representative from Nashua's Ward 8, Hillsboro 11 Support01:00:40.680 - 9:59:41 AM; Laura Tersi, the bill sponsor, supported HB583, which requires the Department of Education to utilize Medicaid direct certification for the free and reduced meals program. She highlighted the issue of hunger in New Hampshire, noting that 39% of children lived in households with insufficient food. Tersi emphasized the importance of school meals for students' health, learning, and behavior, arguing that the bill would help identify students living in poverty who are not currently enrolled in the meals program. She clarified that the bill does not raise income eligibility but aims to streamline the certification process using Medicaid data, which would benefit both families and schools.
HB583: Steve Woodcock, Conway, New Hampshire Support01:09:45.679 - 10:08:46 AM; Steve Woodcock from Conway supported HB583, emphasizing the need to help the poorest families access meals to which they are entitled. He argued that the bill is not a handout or an unfunded mandate but a way to ensure that families in poverty receive the benefits they deserve. Woodcock highlighted that the previous failure of the bill was due to concerns over cost rather than the merit of feeding children. He stressed that the bill would increase funding for schools based on the number of students eligible for free and reduced lunches, thereby fulfilling the state's obligation to support these children and their schools.
HB583: Trisha Label, Resident of Portsmouth, New Hampshire Support01:17:41.639 - 10:16:42 AM; Trisha Label, a resident of Portsmouth and a former school nutrition worker, strongly supported HB583. She shared personal and professional experiences with hunger, highlighting the stigma and complexity of the current school meal application process. Label argued that Medicaid direct certification would simplify the process, remove stigma, and ensure more children receive necessary nutrition. She noted an increase in food pantry participation in her community and stressed the importance of addressing hunger to improve students' health and academic achievement.
HB583: Adam Osborne Support01:23:08.360 - 10:22:09 AM; Adam Osborne expressed support for Medicaid direct certification but his testimony was cut off in the provided transcript.
HB583: Adam Osburn, Principal at Bow Memorial School Support01:23:18.719 - 10:22:19 AM; Adam Osburn, representing school leaders, supports HB583. He highlights that the bill will improve government efficiency by directly linking Medicaid eligible students with free and reduced lunch services. He mentions that Bow has a low free and reduced lunch rate but believes more students would qualify under this bill. Osburn argues that the bill would provide a more accurate measure of poverty by coordinating the number of students on Medicaid with free and reduced lunch numbers. He also discusses the complexity of the current free and reduced lunch application process, suggesting it can be a barrier for some families. He emphasizes the importance of addressing basic needs like food to enhance student learning and mentions potential benefits to municipalities in managing school meal debt. Osburn concludes by supporting the bill for its logical approach to bridging services and improving resource allocation.
HB583: Representative McGuire Information Only01:27:13.639 - 10:26:14 AM; Representative McGuire asks Adam Osburn about the relationship between the number of students signed up for the program and the amount of money the school receives, specifically whether it is tied to the number of meals consumed or just the number of students enrolled. Osburn clarifies that the school funding formula portion relates to the number of students signed up, while the federal funding for meals is based on the number of meals actually consumed.
HB583: Representative Damon Information Only01:28:45.800 - 10:27:46 AM; Representative Damon provides further clarification on Representative McGuire's question, stating that the differentiated aid related to students enrolled in free and reduced lunch comes to the school district regardless of whether they eat meals, while federal funding for meals is contingent on the meals being consumed.
HB583: Representative Fells Information Only01:29:20.800 - 10:28:21 AM; Representative Fells inquires about the complexity of the free and reduced lunch application and whether putting it online would help. Adam Osburn explains that schools are required to send the application home annually and it is also available online, but acknowledges the complexity remains a barrier.
HB583: Representative Papovich Information Only01:31:08.679 - 10:30:09 AM; Representative Papovich asks Adam Osburn about the handling of unpaid school lunch debt at the end of the year in Bow. Osburn notes that Bow does not run a school debt due to their low participation in the free and reduced lunch program.
HB583: Representative Mahan Information Only01:31:54.040 - 10:30:55 AM; Representative Mahan asks if the increase in students qualified for free and reduced lunch through the automated process would also increase differentiated aid. Adam Osburn confirms that it would, referencing the additional funding per pupil.
HB583: Representative Damon Information Only01:32:40.080 - 10:31:41 AM; Representative Damon asks about the role of a designated person in schools to help families fill out the free and reduced lunch application, and potential cost savings from direct certification. Adam Osburn confirms the assistance provided by schools and agrees that direct certification could lead to administrative cost savings.
HB583: Stacy Maryfield, Director of Culinary and Nutrition, New Hampshire Food Bank; Mary Hammer, Nutrition Programs Manager, New Hampshire Food Bank Support01:34:24.719 - 10:33:25 AM; Stacy Maryfield and Mary Hammer from the New Hampshire Food Bank support HB583. They discuss the food bank's efforts to combat food insecurity in New Hampshire, noting the distribution of over 17 million pounds of food in 2024 and serving a significant portion of the state's population through partner agencies. They highlight specific programs aimed at children, such as the Recipe for Success and the USDA Summer Food Service Program. They argue that Medicaid direct certification, as proposed in HB583, would increase food access for children by eliminating the need for a complex application process, thereby reducing childhood food insecurity.
HB583: Megan Brabeck, Newmarket; representing Save the Children Action Network Support01:38:30.239 - 10:37:31 AM; Megan Brabeck testified in support of HB583, emphasizing the importance of addressing child hunger in New Hampshire. She shared results from a national poll conducted in June 2024, which highlighted the high cost of living and the need for government intervention in helping families with food and groceries. Additionally, a state-specific survey from December in New Hampshire found that 71% of voters considered the cost of food and groceries as a very serious or extremely serious issue. Brabeck also conveyed a statement from Ben Buckley, a new father from Newmarket, who stressed the importance of school meals for children's education, health, and social development. He specifically supported HB583 for its potential to expedite the certification process for Medicaid-eligible children for free or reduced-price meals, thereby reducing administrative burdens and improving access to nutrition for students.
HB583: Dr. Christine Arau, Concord; Pediatrician, Vice President of the American Academy of Pediatrics NH Chapter, Mother of three Support01:42:13.599 - 10:41:14 AM; Dr. Christine Arau testified in support of HB583, highlighting the importance of access to nutritious food for children's ability to learn and thrive. She mentioned that over 10,000 children eligible for Medicaid, indicating low family income, are not enrolled in the free and reduced school lunch program. Arau shared a personal story of a parent struggling with food insecurity, underscoring the stigma and real challenges faced by families. She argued against alternatives to the program, such as online applications, stating that all eligible children should benefit from the program to avoid missing out on essential nutrition. Arau concluded by advocating for the passage of HB583 to ensure all children have access to a healthy breakfast and lunch, which would improve their physical health, behavior, and long-term health outcomes.
HB583: Laura Milikin, Executive Director; Riona, Deputy Director, New Hampshire Hunger Solutions Support01:46:58.840 - 10:45:59 AM; Laura Milikin and Riona from New Hampshire Hunger Solutions testified in support of HB583. They explained the income eligibility limits for free and reduced meals and noted the discrepancy between Medicaid enrollment and the free and reduced meal program, suggesting less stigma around Medicaid. They emphasized the nutritional value of school meals and the work they do with schools to increase participation. Milikin also addressed a question about children being denied meals due to inability to pay, confirming that such incidents occur, particularly with high school students. They stressed the importance of improving school meal provision and the role of Medicaid direct certification in achieving this. They clarified that the bill would not raise eligibility but help identify eligible children more efficiently.
HB583: Jim O'Connell, Manchester; Vice Chair of the Manchester Board of School Committee Support01:53:28.760 - 10:52:29 AM; Jim O'Connell testified in support of HB583, emphasizing its nonpartisan nature and the efficiency it would bring to the process of certifying children for free and reduced meals. He pointed out that many states have already implemented similar measures, and highlighted the administrative burden of paperwork in Manchester, where the percentage of children on the program rises throughout the year. O'Connell stressed that simplifying the certification process would not only save costs but also ensure that hungry children in Manchester and across New Hampshire receive the nutrition they need to learn effectively. He advocated for the bill's passage, noting the significant benefits and lack of negatives.
HB583: David Trumble, Unspecified location Support01:57:09.159 - 10:56:10 AM; David Trumble testified in support of HB583, focusing on the educational impacts of food insecurity. He referenced a report by Feeding America titled 'Child Food Insecurity: The Economic Impact on Our Nation,' which showed significant differences in academic performance between food-secure and food-insecure children. Trumble highlighted that food-insecure children are more likely to need special education services, repeat grades, and face disciplinary issues. He argued that ensuring children are adequately fed would save the state money by reducing the need for additional educational services. Trumble concluded by appealing to the state's responsibility to care for its children, likening the state to a family.
HB646: Representative Lurki, Hillsborough 11; Nashua Support03:08:16.479 - 12:07:17 PM; Representative Lurki introduced HB646, which requires school districts to establish an online application for participation in the free and reduced meal program. He highlighted the importance of the school meals program in addressing childhood hunger and improving academic outcomes. Lurki noted the challenges with the current paper-based system, which often results in lost or unreturned forms, delaying enrollment and potentially leading to meal debt. He praised the efficiency of online applications, citing Nashua's successful implementation over the past decade, which significantly reduced verification times and errors. Lurki also mentioned the benefits of privacy, accessibility, and reduced administrative burdens for school staff. He concluded by supporting the bill's efficiency and potential to help more children access school meals.
HB646: Representative Kuger, Nashua Ward 3 Support03:17:32.800 - 12:16:33 PM; Representative Kuger spoke in support of HB 646, emphasizing the importance of providing an online option for free and reduced lunch applications. They highlighted the efficiency and security of online forms, reducing the risk of lost paperwork and missed deadlines. As a former educator, Kuger stressed the necessity of food security for academic success, sharing personal experiences of witnessing hungry students and the potential impact of missed meals on their daily nutrition.
HB646: Representative Christine Cybert, Hillsborough District 21; Manchester Ward 1 Support03:19:24.279 - 12:18:25 PM; Representative Cybert supported HB 646 by sharing Manchester's successful experience with online applications for free and reduced meals. She noted the increased accessibility and accuracy in identifying eligible students, which in turn helps secure additional funding for districts. She mentioned the cost-effectiveness of the program, with annual costs in Manchester being between $1,000 to $2,000. Cybert also emphasized the importance of having an online option available throughout the school year to address sudden income losses, and called for New Hampshire to fully utilize available tools to combat childhood hunger.
HB646: Megan Brabeck, Save the Children Action Network; Newmarket Support03:23:20.880 - 12:22:21 PM; Megan Brabeck from Save the Children Action Network supported HB 646, focusing on the benefits of enrolling more students in the free and reduced meals program. She explained how online applications could help schools access federal reimbursements, thereby reducing the financial burden on schools to feed hungry students. Brabeck shared a statement from advocate Ben Buckley of Newmarket, who emphasized the convenience and efficiency of online applications and the long-term benefits of ensuring students receive necessary meals to succeed academically and professionally.
HB646: Sam Kuger Support03:25:45.160 - 12:24:46 PM; Sam Kuger supported HB 646 by sharing a personal anecdote from his high school days, where he witnessed and personally addressed a friend's food insecurity. He recounted buying extra lunches for his friend who was too embarrassed to apply for free meals, highlighting the potential barriers to accessing these services. Kuger emphasized the importance of ensuring all options are available to combat food insecurity and urged support for the bill to prevent similar situations in the future.
HB646: Cynthia Tibo, Derry School District Information Only03:28:15.439 - 12:27:16 PM; Cynthia Tibo, the McKinney-Vento homeless liaison for the Derry School District, provided information about the McKinney-Vento Assistance Act, a federal program that assists homeless children with food, transportation, and access to school. She explained the process of qualifying for and receiving assistance through the program, emphasizing the immediate addition of qualified students to the food service list. Tibo also discussed the challenges homeless families face in accessing fresh fruits and vegetables, noting that many live in temporary housing without facilities for food preparation. She highlighted the USDA's dietary recommendations and the difficulties in meeting these for homeless children, as well as the importance of programs like '68 Hours of Hunger' which provide weekend food, though not without issues like stigma among older children. Tibo also touched on the challenges of formula donations for infants and toddlers under the McKinney-Vento Act.
HB646: Rihanna Sarin, New Hampshire Hunger Solutions Support03:34:33.279 - 12:33:34 PM; Rihanna Sarin from New Hampshire Hunger Solutions spoke in support of the bill, emphasizing the need for systemic changes to increase access to food for children. She highlighted the alternative feeding processes in schools, including food pantries and direct teacher assistance, and stressed the importance of confidential and efficient processes for free and reduced meal applications. Sarin pointed out the stigma associated with paper applications and advocated for online systems to reduce errors and increase privacy. She also discussed her organization's efforts to promote and facilitate the application process, including the use of QR codes and signs at schools, which have shown significant reductions in school meal debt.
HB646: Kelly Rambo, Bureau Administrator for the Wellness and Nutrition Bureau, NH Department of Education Information Only03:40:32.319 - 12:39:33 PM; Kelly Rambo, along with Melissa White, the division director for learner support at the New Hampshire Department of Education, provided technical information regarding the fiscal note for the bill. They clarified that the projected software costs are based on local level expenses due to student privacy laws, which prevent a state-level application system. Rambo explained the variability in costs due to different data platforms used by local districts and the indeterminable nature of the exact costs. They responded to questions about the potential overestimation of costs and the current systems in place for online applications, stating that the department does not have data on which districts use online systems.
HB646: Hope Damon, State Representative, Sullivan County District 8 Support03:50:41.560 - 12:49:42 PM; Representative Hope Damon introduced HB703, which aims to prohibit school districts from denying meals to students with unpaid meal balances and to make an appropriation for this purpose. She highlighted incidents in the Goffstown and Keene School Districts as examples of the need for this legislation. Damon stressed the importance of not penalizing children for their family's financial situation and discussed the low income thresholds for free and reduced meals, which she argued do not reflect current living costs. She detailed the bill's provisions, including no alternative meals, no stigmatizing practices, and no restrictions on extracurricular activities due to meal debt. Damon also mentioned the need for better fiscal note calculations and emphasized the critical role of school meals in children's lives.
HB646: Papovich Information Only03:57:59.520 - 12:57:00 PM; Papovich addressed the committee's question regarding section 8h of the bill, which would allow schools to complete free meal applications for students if they possess the necessary information. This is currently not permitted, and schools can only assist parents in filling out these forms.
HB646: Fnr Information Only03:58:46.199 - 12:57:47 PM; Fnr responded to a follow-up question about how schools would obtain the information needed to complete meal applications if parents do not submit them. Fnr suggested that schools might already have this information from other program applications but committed to finding a more definitive answer before the work session.
HB646: Unnamed Speaker Information Only03:59:32.600 - 12:58:33 PM; An unnamed speaker asked about potential misuse of the free meal system by students who are not eligible but take advantage of it. The speaker was concerned about students knowing the system and exploiting it, questioning the recourse for such actions.
HB646: Unnamed Speaker Information Only04:00:18.800 - 12:59:19 PM; The same speaker continued to discuss the scenario of a student taking advantage of the system, clarifying that the bill aims to ensure hungry students are fed, and questioned whether there would be any way to prevent misuse.
HB646: Fellows Information Only04:01:06.880 - 1:00:07 PM; Fellows inquired about schools that do not participate in the federal meal program and whether the bill would apply to charter schools. The response indicated that only a small number of schools in New Hampshire do not participate, with one example being a small K-4 school in Center Harbor. The bill does not apply to charter schools.
HB646: Luno Information Only04:02:41.520 - 1:01:42 PM; Luno asked about the cost-effectiveness of the proposed measure in the context of New Hampshire's education budget, suggesting that it seems like a small investment for significant outcomes. The response affirmed that it is a small investment with substantial benefits for student outcomes.
HB646: Guire Information Only04:04:13.040 - 1:03:14 PM; Guire asked if parents could opt their children out of school meals, citing potential health reasons like weight loss. The response clarified that there is a mechanism for opting out, but also noted that students receiving school meals have lower obesity rates, challenging the premise of the question.
HB646: Fellows Information Only04:04:58.399 - 1:03:59 PM; Fellows raised concerns about parents potentially not paying for meals if they know their children will be fed anyway. The response acknowledged that some might take advantage but emphasized the importance of ensuring students are fed, suggesting districts could communicate with parents.
HB646: Unnamed Speaker Information Only04:06:33.159 - 1:05:34 PM; An unnamed speaker asked if the bill would prevent schools from checking with parents about unpaid balances. The response was that the bill does not prohibit this, and schools should and do communicate with parents.
HB646: Woodcock Support04:07:36.119 - 1:06:37 PM; Woodcock provided information about the number of schools without meal programs and emphasized the issue of school meal debt. They supported the bill, arguing that it helps address the needs of hungry students and reduces costs passed down to local taxpayers.
HB646: Megan Rebeck Support04:10:56.520 - 1:09:57 PM; Megan Rebeck shared personal reflections on the impact of hunger in schools, citing her mother's experience as a teacher in Chester and Marlborough, NH. She supported the bill, arguing it addresses the student's experience in the lunchroom and does not relieve parents of financial responsibility. She also presented a statement from Ben Buckley of Newmarket, emphasizing the bill's role in reducing social stigma and supporting student well-being.
HB646: Core Support04:13:34.920 - 1:12:35 PM; Core supported the bill, emphasizing its role in preventing the shaming of children in the meal line and protecting their well-being. They discussed the creation of school meal debt, the importance of direct certification, and the nutritional value of school meals. Core urged the committee to pass the bill, highlighting over 255 online testimonies in support.
HB703: Cynthia Tibo, Derry School District Support04:16:58.239 - 1:15:59 PM; Cynthia Tibo, the McKinney-Vento liaison for the Derry School District, shared a poignant story about a third-grade student who was offered milk and cheese on a hamburger roll due to an overdue meal account balance. The child, lactose intolerant, was too embarrassed to inform the staff and chose to forgo the meal, leading to a day without food. This incident caused distress to the child's mother, who was grateful when the child qualified for McKinney-Vento assistance and could eat with peers the following day. Tibo advocated for House Bill 703, suggesting that it would be beneficial if all children could receive the same meal as their peers, regardless of overdue accounts, and emphasized the need for funding to support vulnerable students.
HB703: Becky Wilson, New Hampshire School Boards Association Information Only04:19:18.319 - 1:18:19 PM; Becky Wilson from the New Hampshire School Boards Association provided context on unpaid lunch balances, stating that while they do not take a position on the bill, they support its goal of ensuring students are not penalized due to adult financial decisions. She highlighted the financial burden of unpaid balances, citing examples from various districts with amounts ranging from $30,000 to $992,000. Wilson suggested that the bill's provision to allow the Department to draw funds to cover these balances could help alleviate the issue, and stressed the importance of feeding students while being sensitive to the financial situations of families.
HB656: Representative Katie Pell, Wolfeboro-Tuftonboro School District Information Only04:24:06.439 - 1:23:07 PM; Representative Katie Pell introduced HB656, which aims to enhance accountability and transparency regarding federal funds received by local school districts. She explained that the bill addresses the ambiguity surrounding the use of funds like the Esser funds, which changed purposes over time. The bill requires that all federal funds be deemed unanticipated and that notices include summaries of obligations incurred by accepting these funds. Additionally, the minutes of board meetings must contain these summaries for taxpayer clarity. Pell acknowledged the need for further refinement of the bill and expressed openness to amendments.
HB656: Representative Margaret Dry, Sullivan District 7 Support04:30:27.960 - 1:29:28 PM; Representative Margaret Dry, a co-sponsor of HB656, emphasized the importance of transparency, particularly in rural towns considering school mergers or consolidations. She recounted an instance where undisclosed obligations halted a potential merger, underscoring the need for all parties to be aware of financial commitments. Dry supported the bill, believing it would aid in making fair decisions regarding school consolidations.
HB656: Unidentified Speaker Information Only04:31:41.239 - 1:30:42 PM; The speaker seeks clarification on the specifics of the financial obligations associated with the money received by schools, particularly in relation to federal grants. They mention an example where federal funding might require a long-term commitment like hiring a PE teacher for 10 years. The discussion revolves around understanding the obligations tied to the funds and how they could impact school mergers or other financial decisions.
HB656: Unidentified Speaker Information Only04:32:28.119 - 1:31:29 PM; The speaker continues to discuss the specifics of federal funding, particularly how it relates to obligations like hiring staff for multiple years. They express the importance of full disclosure regarding any obligations tied to federal funds, comparing it to buying a house. The conversation also touches on how federal money like Title One funds work and how transparency in these financial obligations is crucial for any potential mergers.
HB656: Unidentified Speaker Information Only04:33:16.000 - 1:32:17 PM; The speaker elaborates on the potential long-term obligations associated with federal money, using the example of charter school startup funds versus regular school district funds like Title One. They highlight the importance of transparency and how this bill could help in ensuring that any obligations are clearly communicated, aiding in smoother school district mergers.
HB656: Unidentified Speaker Information Only04:34:01.958 - 1:33:02 PM; The speaker discusses the implications of receiving federal funds like ESSER monies and the potential long-term obligations, such as hiring a paraprofessional without a clear contract term. They question what happens at the end of the funding period and whether the district would need to use property taxes to continue funding the position, emphasizing the importance of understanding these obligations.
HB656: Unidentified Speaker Information Only04:34:47.879 - 1:33:48 PM; The speaker seeks clarification on whether school boards have the authority to non-renew contracts after federal grant funding expires. They discuss the legal and practical aspects of such decisions, indicating the complexity of managing federal funds and the importance of clear contractual terms.
HB656: Unidentified Speaker Information Only04:35:34.240 - 1:34:35 PM; The speaker continues to discuss the authority of school boards to non-renew contracts post-federal grant funding, emphasizing the need for clear contractual language and the implications for school district budgets.
HB656: Representative Amon Information Only04:36:56.240 - 1:35:57 PM; Representative Amon inquires about the percentage of funding for New Hampshire Public Schools that comes from federal grants. They express an interest in understanding the financial dependency on these funds but do not have the exact figures, suggesting further inquiry.
HB656: Becky Wilson, New Hampshire School Boards Association Oppose04:37:48.438 - 1:36:49 PM; Becky Wilson from the New Hampshire School Boards Association opposes the bill as currently written. They express concerns about the potential requirement for districts to incorporate federal grant money into their operating budgets, which could be a significant burden. Wilson mentions specific federal grants like IDEA and Title One, highlighting the large sums involved and the need for clarity on what the bill requires. They stress the importance of transparency but are worried about the practical implications of the bill's current language.
HB656: Unidentified Speaker Information Only04:40:26.878 - 1:39:27 PM; The speaker discusses the impact of districts planning on grant funding that they might not receive, and the resulting financial implications. They differentiate between anticipated federal grants and competitive grants, explaining how districts make decisions based on the reliability of funding sources.
HB656: Unidentified Speaker Information Only04:41:41.480 - 1:40:42 PM; The speaker addresses the simplicity of the bill, focusing on the notice requirements and the need for transparency. They express confusion about what specific obligations are covered by the bill and how it applies to federal funds, suggesting that the language might be too broad or unclear.
HB656: Representative Papovich Information Only04:44:01.958 - 1:43:02 PM; Representative Papovich questions the value of providing clear accounting to taxpayers regarding the obligations tied to federal funds. They seek to understand the stance of the New Hampshire School Boards Association on this issue, emphasizing the importance of transparency for the public.
HB656: New Hampshire School Boards Association Information Only04:45:24.280 - 1:44:25 PM; The representative from the New Hampshire School Boards Association responded to a question about the training offered to school board members. They confirmed that they provide various trainings related to budgeting, operating budgets, school district communication, and effective meeting management. These trainings help ensure that school board members understand their obligations when dealing with financial matters and district operations.
HB656: Dorus Hoeny, former Nationville School Board member Support04:46:56.718 - 1:45:57 PM; Dorus Hoeny, a former school board member from Nationville (corrected to Nashua), spoke in support of the bill. She shared her experiences where the administration did not seek board input before applying for federal grants, only informing them after the funds were awarded. Hoeny criticized the lack of transparency and suggested that federal funds were used as a 'slush fund' by the administration. She advocated for increased transparency and proposed a study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of federal funds, emphasizing the need for local control over curriculum to respect privacy and promote diversity in instruction.
HB656: Amy Banfield, Parental Rights Advocate, New Hampshire Support04:52:24.400 - 1:51:25 PM; Amy Banfield, a parental rights advocate, supported the bill, emphasizing the importance of transparency in federal grants. She expressed concerns about the details often missing from these grants, particularly regarding parental rights. Banfield cited examples such as grants from the Nellie Mae Foundation and Community School Grants in Manchester, which she argued could change the focus of education to include medical and mental health services without sufficient parental consent. She highlighted issues with data privacy and the potential misuse of funds, advocating for detailed review and public access to grant information.
HB716: Rick Lad, Hale, New Hampshire Support05:06:45.558 - 2:05:46 PM; Rick Lad from Hale (corrected to Hillsborough), New Hampshire, introduced HB716, which seeks to increase funding for the Dual and Concurrent Enrollment Program from $2.5 million to $3 million. He explained that the program now includes grades 10, 11, and 12, resulting in additional costs. Lad highlighted the cost savings for students, noting that taking these courses in high school could save over $10 million in future college costs. He supported the budget increase as outlined in HB1 and HB2.
HB716: McGuire Information Only05:08:29.520 - 2:07:30 PM; McGuire asked about the program's structure, specifically whether the costs of high school students taking community college classes should be borne by the school district. They highlighted the dual credit aspect, where students receive both high school and college credit, and stressed that these courses must meet the community college's accrediting standards, including the requirement for instructors to have a Master's degree and use the same curriculum as the college campus.
HB716: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:09:43.920 - 2:08:44 PM; The speaker responded to McGuire's question, explaining that there should be no additional cost to school districts if an instructor capable of teaching the course is already present at the school. However, a fee of $150 per course through the community college system is incurred. If the school does not have the necessary instructor, they may need to hire one from the community college, which would result in an additional expense.
HB716: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:10:29.878 - 2:09:30 PM; The speaker clarified that the $3 million mentioned in the bill primarily covers the $150 per student fee, which helps save over $10 million in the long run by allowing students to take college courses earlier, thus reducing future educational costs.
HB716: Chancellor Mark Rubenstein, Community College System Support05:12:07.440 - 2:11:08 PM; Chancellor Rubenstein provided a comprehensive overview of the Early College program, detailing its three formats: taught in high schools, on community college campuses, and online. He noted that the program significantly benefits students and the state by offering college credits at a fraction of the cost, saving approximately $13 million in tuition last year. He emphasized the program's growth, its impact on Career Technical Education students, and its potential to keep more students in New Hampshire for higher education. Rubenstein also discussed the financial aspects of the program, explaining how the funds are used to support staff, outreach, and offset costs of more expensive courses.
HB716: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:17:09.480 - 2:16:10 PM; The speaker asked about the participation of high schools in the program and whether it includes online participation, to which Rubenstein confirmed that virtually all high schools participate, with many using the online portion of the program.
HB716: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:17:54.558 - 2:16:55 PM; The speaker inquired about the transferability of credits earned through Early College to other institutions, and Rubenstein affirmed that credits are fully transferable and articulated with both the community college and university systems, providing students with a clear path to further education and potential cost savings.
HB716: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:19:26.600 - 2:18:27 PM; The speaker asked about the costs to the community college system for certifying teachers to teach these courses. Rubenstein explained that the system works with schools to identify already qualified teachers, and the funds are used to support staff and outreach efforts.
HB716: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:20:14.000 - 2:19:15 PM; The speaker requested a detailed breakdown of how the $3 million in funds would be spent. Rubenstein outlined that the funds would cover staffing, outreach, and offset the costs of delivering various courses, particularly those that are more expensive like nursing and automotive programs.
HB716: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:24:04.680 - 2:23:05 PM; The speaker inquired about the participation of homeschooled and private school students in the program. Rubenstein confirmed that the program is open to both groups, with private schools needing a memorandum of understanding.
HB716: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:24:52.440 - 2:23:53 PM; The speaker asked about the continuation rate of students in higher education after participating in dual enrollment and the residency status of these students. Rubenstein provided data showing that 80% of students go on to postsecondary education, with a majority going out of state, but noted recent trends of more students staying in New Hampshire due to the program's expansion into Career Technical Education.
HB716: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:27:14.160 - 2:26:15 PM; The speaker inquired about students who might not have gone to college without this program. Rubenstein explained that while initially the program attracted students already college-bound, recent data shows an increase in participation from CTE students, suggesting a broader reach to students for whom college was not initially a certainty.
HB716: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:28:29.878 - 2:27:30 PM; The speaker asked if any students or school districts had been turned away due to lack of funds. Rubenstein clarified that no one had been turned away due to funding, but there is a limit of two courses per student, and some students might not pursue a third course due to additional costs.

Ladd, Rick(Chairman)(R)[B+]2025	Brown, Pam(Clerk)(R)[B+]2025	Spilsbury, Walter(V Chairman)(R)[A-]2025
McGuire, Dan(R)[A]2025	Ames, Dick(D)[CT]2025	Burton, Wayne(D)[F]2025
Luneau, David(D)[CT]2025	Colcombe, Riché(R)[B+]2025	Chretien, Suzanne(D)[F]2025
Popovici-Muller, Daniel(R)[A-]2025	Damon, Hope(D)[CT]2025	Kofalt, Jim(R)[A+]2025
Fellows, Sallie(D)[CT]2025	Erf, Keith(R)[A]2025	Bricchi, Tracy(D)[D-]2025
Weinstein, Toni(D)[F]2025	Peeples, Raymond(R)[B+]2025	Mehegan, Peter(R)[B+]2025