Committee Summary for House Criminal Justice and Public Safety (01/14/2026)

Bill/Time	Type	Title	Sponsor
HB1793 00:04:05.040 - 9:02:57 AM	Public Hearing	prohibiting public colleges and universities from regulating the possession or carrying of firearms and non-lethal weapons on campus.	Farrington, Samuel(R)[A+]2025
HB1793 02:31:14.720 - 11:30:06 AM	Executive Session	prohibiting public colleges and universities from regulating the possession or carrying of firearms and non-lethal weapons on campus.	Farrington, Samuel(R)[A+]2025
HB1697 02:45:46.080 - 11:44:38 AM	Public Hearing	exempting certain firearms and firearm accessories manufactured and retained in New Hampshire from federal regulation.	Belcher, Mike(R)[B+]2025
HB1697 03:10:01.600 - 12:08:53 PM	Executive Session	exempting certain firearms and firearm accessories manufactured and retained in New Hampshire from federal regulation.	Belcher, Mike(R)[B+]2025
HB1699 03:18:40.720 - 12:17:32 PM	Public Hearing	enabling the carriage of certain firearms on slow-moving boats.	McFarlane, Donald(R)[A]2025
HB1365 03:32:12.239 - 12:31:04 PM	Public Hearing	relative to applications for licenses to carry a loaded pistol or revolver.	McFarlane, Donald(R)[A]2025
HB1446 03:44:46.239 - 12:43:38 PM	Public Hearing	providing that an individual's use of therapeutic cannabis shall not disqualify the individual from the purchase, ownership, or possession of a firearm.	Mannion, Tom(R)[A+]2025
HB1454 05:04:34.240 - 2:03:26 PM	Public Hearing	relative to the possession of firearms following a court order requiring surrender of firearms and ammunition.	Markell, Jay(R)[B]2025
HB1387 05:24:26.000 - 2:23:18 PM	Public Hearing	repealing limiting liability for certain design features of firearms.	Selig, Loren(D)[D-]2025
HB1749 -	Public Hearing	reinstating the death penalty for murder offenses.	King, Seth(R)[B+]2025
HB1642 -	Public Hearing	relative to extreme risk protection orders.	Selig, Loren(D)[D-]2025
HB1749 05:50:08.878 - 2:49:00 PM	Public Hearing	reinstating the death penalty for murder offenses.	King, Seth(R)[B+]2025
HB1642 06:21:45.040 - 3:20:37 PM	Public Hearing	relative to extreme risk protection orders.	Selig, Loren(D)[D-]2025
Unclear 07:21:31.440 - 4:20:23 PM	General Working Session	Unclear

HB1793: Representative Ferrington Support00:04:05.040 - 9:02:57 AM; Introduced HB1793, emphasizing New Hampshire's constitutional right to bear arms under Article 2a, approved in 1982. Highlighted the 2017 constitutional carry law and the natural right to self-defense granted by God, not government. Argued that public colleges and universities infringe on this right through gun-free policies. Referenced Supreme Court decisions like Heller (2008) affirming individual Second Amendment rights and Bruen (2022) requiring restrictions to align with historical traditions. Noted New Hampshire's preemption statute reserving firearms regulation to the state legislature. Stated gun-free zones are defenseless, citing 97% of mass shootings occurring there, and the bill aligns public universities with state law to empower self-defense.
HB1793: Representative Burton (Town of Durham) Oppose00:09:37.920 - 9:08:29 AM; Presented a resolution from the Durham Town Council opposing HB1793. Noted Durham hosts UNH's flagship campus with 16,000 students, faculty, and staff, requiring coordinated public safety. Argued the bill violates RSA 187-A:16 granting universities autonomy, including firearms policies. Highlighted current secure storage at UNH police for hunting/target shooting. Warned of private lawsuits and damages against institutions maintaining safety policies. Described campuses' unique risks: young adults in close quarters, large events, mental health issues, substance use, and suicide risks where firearms increase lethality. Drew from military experience in Vietnam, citing accidental discharges and friendly fire, expressing fear of guns in dorms or with intoxicated students in Durham.
HB1793: Representative Granger Support00:15:09.519 - 9:14:01 AM; Drew analogy from H.G. Wells' 'The Time Machine' to argue against creating defenseless 'Eloi'-like students. Shared Army National Guard experience starting at 18, emphasizing responsibility from handling weapons fostered maturity. Argued allowing campus carry protects constitutional rights, enhances safety, and promotes responsibility. Noted young people as historical warfighters trusted with weapons. Dismissed concerns about drunk students by comparing to Army infantry training, urging passage of campus carry to let students grow responsibly.
HB1793: Representative Timothy Hrian (Durham) Oppose00:17:10.400 - 9:16:02 AM; Representing Strafford County District 10 (Durham, home to UNH), argued universities have natural rights to ensure campus safety, including restricting weapons. Compared Durham/UNH to Blacksburg, Virginia (Virginia Tech, 2007 shooting killing 32). Cited Utah Valley University shooting where concealed carry didn't prevent assassination; shooter assembled rifle, escaped without return fire from armed citizens. Stated the bill harms college towns, doesn't enhance safety, and fits campus shooter profile.
HB1793: Representative Lauren Celig (Durham) Oppose00:20:06.799 - 9:18:58 AM; Representing Strafford County District 10 (Durham) and as parent of two college students. Shared daughter's 4-hour lockdown from false active shooter alert (swatting with umbrella mistaken for gun). Provided Durham/UNH police stats: over 200 assaults in 5 years involving campus-related incidents (fights, etc.), none involving guns due to storage policies. Argued more guns increase risks in assaults, potentially leading to deaths. Stated armed crowds heighten chances of innocent shootings. Urged voting inexpedient to legislate.
HB1793: Professor Nick Germana (Keene State College) Oppose00:24:41.440 - 9:23:33 AM; Representing Cheshire County District 15, professor at Keene State College for 20 years. Debunked 'good guy with a gun' myth, citing Texas's lax laws and high mass shootings. Highlighted low hit rates of trained officers under fire (18-50%), worse for civilians like himself despite responsible ownership and hunting background. Expressed concerns for law enforcement identifying threats amid multi-directional gunfire from untrained armed individuals. Noted mental health crisis on campuses, fearing increased suicides with accessible firearms. Supported Second Amendment but emphasized 'well regulated.'
HB1793: Representative James Thibo (St. Anselm College student) Support00:29:43.600 - 9:28:35 AM; Co-sponsor of HB1793, representing Franklin and Northfield, sophomore at St. Anselm College. Advocated for constitutional rights on campus, citing high school students' fears post-Brown shooting about campus safety, especially women afraid after dark (even pepper spray prohibited). Argued framers prioritized right to bear arms in U.S. Constitution and NH's 1784 Constitution Article 2a applies to all, not excluding students. Stated gun-free policies create second-class citizens on public property, enabling attacks as in Brown, MIT, Utah Valley. Criminals ignore policies; armed students deter or defend, potentially preventing crimes.
HB1793: Representative Tony Weinstein (Newmarket and Newfields) Oppose00:34:55.679 - 9:33:47 AM; Representing Rockingham District 10, opposed bill as dangerous policy. Contrasted bans on hot plates/candles/air fryers in dorms with allowing firearms. Envisioned risks at alcohol-fueled frat parties with young, developing students prone to poor judgment, compounded by mental health issues and school shooting fears. Argued guns deepen trauma, not safety. Highlighted chaos in active shooter responses with multiple armed people confusing police. Stated bill removes campuses' ability to protect students, staff, visitors, including children at events. Urged voting against, keeping guns out of educational spaces.
HB1793: Caleb Brower (UNH Student, Mont Vernon) Support00:37:57.599 - 9:36:49 AM; Caleb Brower, a freshman history student at UNH from Mont Vernon, NH, testified in support of HB1793. He stated he is not a gun enthusiast and has no intention of carrying a firearm himself, but believes allowing peers to exercise Second Amendment rights on and off campus enhances his safety. He argued that constitutional rights do not end with higher education and referenced recent events at Brown University to highlight the urgency of campus safety. He emphasized that campus and local police are crucial, but New Hampshire's 'live free or die' mantra should not be voided on college campuses.
HB1793: Colin Patterson (UNH Student) Support00:38:51.440 - 9:37:43 AM; Colin Patterson, a freshman nursing student at UNH, supported HB1793 despite not owning a gun or planning to get a license. He criticized UNH's lack of safety measures, noting academic buildings are open without access controls during school hours, allowing easy entry by potential threats. He expressed anxiety about the possibility of armed intruders and argued that allowing qualified classmates and faculty to carry firearms for self-defense would ease his concerns, even if he personally would not carry.
HB1793: Lauren Banker, Chief Steve Lee, Chief Nathan Buffington (University System of NH) Oppose00:42:19.359 - 9:41:11 AM; Lauren Banker, Senior Director of Government Relations for the University System of NH, introduced the group opposing HB1793. Chief Steve Lee, UNH Police Chief with nearly 30 years of experience, detailed concerns. He argued that allowing concealed carry complicates law enforcement responses in active shooter scenarios by dividing resources to identify armed individuals, potentially delaying threat neutralization. He highlighted mental health risks, noting suicide as the second leading cause of death among college students, and easy access to firearms in unsecured dorms could exacerbate this. He also addressed the campus environment with large events, youth programs, and daycares, where controlling firearms would be challenging. Chief Nathan Buffington from Plymouth Police deferred to Chief Lee, agreeing with the opposition. The group urged finding the bill inexpedient to legislate.
HB1793: Representative Mike Belchure Support01:05:23.039 - 10:04:15 AM; Representative Mike Belchure, a Second Amendment supporter and firearms enthusiast, spoke briefly in favor of HB1793. He acknowledged concerns about student maturity but argued universities should foster adulthood and responsibility rather than coddling students with excessive mental health services for minor issues. He criticized universities for extending adolescence for profit and compared college students to military personnel, suggesting cultural shifts have lowered maturity expectations, and education systems bear responsibility for this.
HB1793: Representative Jane McFarland Support01:09:55.120 - 10:08:47 AM; Representative Jane McFarland supported HB1793, emphasizing New Hampshire's strong firearms preemption where the legislature, not agencies, decides prohibited carry areas. She noted no RSA designates public university campuses as gun-free zones, and university policies prohibiting firearms conflict with state law like RSA 159:27, which protects locked vehicle storage. She argued disarming lawful adults creates soft targets, trusting citizens without permits, and the bill restores constitutional and statutory balance, urging an Ought to Pass recommendation.
HB1793: Michael Glover (Durham Resident, UNH Alum) Oppose01:12:56.400 - 10:11:48 AM; Michael Glover, a Durham resident and UNH PhD graduate in computer engineering, opposed HB1793. He shared stories of guns, drunks, and drugs on campus from his experience, warning against student fantasies of heroically using firearms in crises. He viewed the bill as a culture war tactic distracting from universities' academic and social growth mission. He argued introducing guns would emotionally scar the transformative college experience and deter serious talent, citing his involvement in successful UNH-rooted startups and threatening to withhold potential endowments if such 'games' continue.
HB1793: Representative Tracy Bricky Oppose01:15:12.400 - 10:14:04 AM; Representative Tracy Bricky, in her second year, opposed guns on campus despite not being against guns generally. She shared feeling unsafe in Rep's Hall where concealed carry is allowed, worrying about accidental discharges or mental health crises leading to harm. She argued guns do not make her feel safer and declined questions.
HB1793: Alexander Fenton (UNH Student) Support01:17:49.199 - 10:16:41 AM; Alexander Fenton, a 19-year-old UNH business student, supported HB1793, framing it as a constitutional rights issue. He argued college students, as legal adults eligible for the draft, contracts, voting, and military service, should not lose Second Amendment rights on campus, their primary home. He emphasized equal treatment under the law, stating government's duty is to protect all citizens' rights without exceptions for convenience, and New Hampshire upholds this for law-abiding adults.
HB1793: Benny Griffin (UNH Student) Oppose01:20:06.239 - 10:18:58 AM; Benny Griffin, a UNH freshman, opposed HB1793, describing campus as a new, high-stress environment for students away from home. He warned of tragedies like accidental shootings by peers or suicides in dorms, citing mental health challenges, academic pressure, and social conflicts. He argued guns increase fear and division rather than safety, and the bill's one-size-fits-all approach ignores local control and student input. He praised UNH's top-ranked safety, including the blue light emergency system ensuring quick police response, and noted students considering transfers if passed, potentially losing enrollment to nearby schools.
HB1793: Michael Appleton, Student Senate President at NHTI Support01:24:49.840 - 10:23:41 AM; Michael Appleton, a US Marine Corps veteran and student senate president at NHTI, testified in support of HB1793. He shifted from his prepared remarks about NHTI being a commuter campus to criticizing the portrayal of college students as incompetent and untrustworthy to exercise rights. He argued that treating the Second Amendment differently from other rights like voting is illogical, emphasizing that maturity for one right implies maturity for all, and restricting rights for safety undermines freedom.
HB1793: Dr. John Bunker, Associate Dean at UNH Oppose01:26:31.760 - 10:25:23 AM; Dr. John Bunker, associate dean at UNH's College of Health and Human Services with experience at other universities and on mental health boards, strongly opposed HB1793. He highlighted the high-stress campus environment increasing risks from firearms, noting the developing prefrontal cortex in 18-20 year olds could turn minor crises into tragedies. He addressed suicide risks, stating guns increase lethality of attempts, and echoed concerns about confusion in emergencies from multiple armed individuals. He urged voting inexpedient to legislate to respect campus autonomy.
HB1793: Kathleen Slover, Portsmouth Oppose01:30:53.280 - 10:29:45 AM; Kathleen Slover from Portsmouth opposed HB1793, citing inconclusive research from the Rand Corporation on gun-free zones and campus carry effects on violent crime. She shared a statement from a 30-year NH state university employee about effective police de-escalation without guns and fiscal impacts like higher insurance and enrollment drops. As a karate green belt, she advised running as the best defense against assault, criticizing the idea of guns or tools like pepper spray as heroic solutions.
HB1793: Awen Osborne, Keene State College Student Support01:33:42.880 - 10:32:34 AM; Awen Osborne, a freshman political science student at Keene State College, supported HB1793 for allowing self-defense via concealed carry, especially for young women disadvantaged against male attackers. She noted pepper spray's unreliability and shared personal experiences of creepy encounters and being followed. With extensive firearms training, she emphasized responsible carry to protect herself and others, arguing opposition leaves women defenseless.
HB1793: Patrick Berlin, College Student Oppose01:36:55.040 - 10:35:47 AM; Patrick Berlin, a college student, opposed HB1793, arguing guns on campus distract from education and research, fostering perceptions of harm rather than safety. He noted added shooters complicate police response in mass shootings, and while acknowledging student maturity, highlighted immature behaviors like frat parties increasing risks of accidental shootings and suicides, which he sees as more prevalent than mass shootings.
HB1793: Justin Wilson, Resident of Candia Support01:39:03.840 - 10:37:55 AM; Justin Wilson from Candia supported HB1793, criticizing school regulations stripping constitutional carry rights from students. He argued that only law-abiding citizens are restricted, while criminals ignore rules, questioning why moral citizens lose self-defense rights for attending university.
HB1793: Rusty Peterson, from New York Oppose01:41:26.960 - 10:40:18 AM; Rusty Peterson from New York opposed HB1793, contrasting strict hunter safety training with lax campus carry, warning of risks at events like frat parties or games where alcohol and frustration could lead to violence. He called the bill 'safety's off' and suggested unhappy individuals transfer from public institutions like UNH.
HB1793: Matthew Brooks, UNH Student Support01:42:35.679 - 10:41:27 AM; Matthew Brooks, a four-year UNH student, supported HB1793, questioning why students cannot carry guns on campus while off-campus frat houses, stereotyped as drunken environments, can have them since they are not college-owned. He noted peers' prior testimonies covered other points.
HB1793: Elliot Bin Information Only01:43:50.480 - 10:42:42 AM; Elliot Bin was called to testify and provided petitions from Young Americans for Liberty opposing the bill, but no further testimony details were given in the transcript.
HB1793: Elliot Buouan, University of New Hampshire senior from Dover, state chair for Young Americans for Liberty, National Guard member Support01:44:57.520 - 10:43:49 AM; Buouan testified about feeling like a second-class citizen on campus despite paying taxes, losing his right to self-defense as a college student. He highlighted his service in the National Guard where he carries firearms, yet feels distrusted on campus. He mentioned receiving threats while organizing liberty-minded students and commuting to school. He shared that he's tabled on campus, had hundreds of conversations, and collected around 300 student signatures supporting the bill. He emphasized it's about principle, safety, and natural rights, urging support for HB 1793.
HB1793: Nicholas Hart, from Portsmouth, New Hampshire Support01:47:38.400 - 10:46:30 AM; Hart, new to testifying, emphasized New Hampshire's 'live free or die' spirit and dismissed concerns about immaturity leading to accidents with firearms, noting other risks like drunk driving. He referenced a police officer's opposition and countered with the UVA shooting where police took 72 minutes to respond, leaving students trapped with an active shooter. He criticized bans on guns, pepper spray, and knives, questioning campus safety without self-defense options.
HB1793: J.R. Hole (Representative Hull), on behalf of New Hampshire Firearms Coalition Support01:49:52.159 - 10:48:44 AM; Hull submitted written testimony and addressed prior comments, noting M16s are drop-safe and referencing a Virginia Tech incident where Professor Lescu sacrificed himself but couldn't arm to defend students. He cited Supreme Court cases like Castle Rock v. Gonzales affirming no state duty to protect. He mentioned Cleveland, Ohio's reduced firearm restrictions leading to safer conditions per a recent AG report, contrasting fears of 'blood in the streets.' He criticized UNH's safety claims and compliance issues with underage drinking, urging better protection for students.
HB1793: Mr. Simpin, federally licensed firearms dealer from Nashua Support01:54:40.880 - 10:53:32 AM; Simpin, with a PhD from London School of Economics, cited Supreme Court cases from 1855 and 1982, and Castle Rock v. Colorado (2005), affirming no constitutional right to police protection. He argued gun control is futile given 512 million firearms in the US per 2023 Treasury and DOJ data, as they are numerous and concealable. He offered to answer questions and submitted prepared testimony.
HB1793: James Gaffne Support01:58:10.639 - 10:57:02 AM; Gaffne, post-surgery and mobility-limited, supported the bill, appalled by state prohibitions on self-defense including firearms, knives, or pepper spray. He argued individuals should choose defense methods based on situations, especially when running is impossible. He advocated broadening the bill to any entity receiving state funds and opposed disarming adults crossing campus lines, considering returning to school.
HB1793: Deborah House, President of American Federation of Teachers New Hampshire Oppose02:00:48.880 - 10:59:40 AM; House opposed the bill, representing 3,500 members in education. She stressed universities' duty of care for safe learning, living, and working environments, urging self-governance by experts like campus police for data-driven decisions. She noted UNH's top-10 safest campus rating and studies showing no crime reduction from similar laws, but increased violence from more weapons in heated tempers, accidents, or crises. She recommended finding HB 1793 inexpedient to legislate and submitted testimony.
HB1793: Bill (last name unclear), representing Liberty Action, project of Young Americans for Liberty, from Massachusetts Support02:04:04.800 - 11:02:56 AM; Bill apologized for misnaming the chairman and supported Second Amendment rights for constitutional carry on campuses. He mentioned communicating with 16,000 NH supporters for petitions and noted 90% of mass casualty incidents occur in gun-free zones, calling it a billboard for attackers. He fully supported HB 1793.
HB1793: Attorney Penny Dean Support02:06:22.239 - 11:05:14 AM; Dean questioned why the NH Attorney General hasn't pursued declaratory judgment against universities for violating state law on constitutional rights with public funds. She supported the bill, critiquing police hit rates (10-20% in NYC) versus near-zero accidental hits by armed citizens. She found claims of police disarming citizens insulting, especially to women, emphasizing self-defense as a personal choice and sharing anecdotes about rape impacts. She urged enforcing existing laws and applying legal pressure on universities.
HB1793: Chair Vote02:31:14.720 - 11:30:06 AM; The chair opens the executive session on HB1793 and makes a motion of ought to pass, which is seconded. After discussion, the chair calls the roll and announces the motion carries 7 to 6.
HB1793: Representative Sher Oppose02:31:14.720 - 11:30:06 AM; Representative Sher discusses that constitutional rights, including the right to bear arms, are not absolute and must be balanced against safety concerns on campuses. He argues that college students are less mature and that universities like UNH have safety issues that justify restrictions. He notes no problems with current policies and opposes the bill to maintain campus safety, despite recognizing the constitutional right.
HB1793: Unnamed Representative Information Only02:33:16.800 - 11:32:08 AM; The representative questions Representative Sher on whether the state must show a compelling interest to disarm people, flipping the burden of proof. Representative Sher agrees a compelling need exists and compares to other New England universities without campus carry.
HB1793: Unnamed Representative Oppose02:35:56.640 - 11:34:48 AM; The representative opposes the bill, citing UNH's policy restricting weapons by location, not person, supported by Supreme Court precedent in Heller for sensitive places. Emphasizes university's authority and responsibility for safety, noting no absolute rights and effective current safety measures.
HB1793: Unnamed Representative Oppose02:38:23.840 - 11:37:15 AM; The representative will vote no, citing constitutional concerns but suggesting compromises like prohibiting in dorms or requiring safety courses. Hopes for exploration if the bill advances.
HB1793: Representative Sheer Oppose02:39:37.200 - 11:38:29 AM; Representative Sheer clarifies that the issue is developing judgment in younger people, not immaturity, based on college experiences and improved judgment over time.
HB1793: Representative Harry Guthrie Oppose02:40:35.680 - 11:39:27 AM; Representative Guthrie opposes based on underdeveloped mental reasoning in youth until age 27, consistent with criminal justice considerations. Notes university concerns with firearms versus tasers and risks in active situations.
HB1793: Unnamed Republican Representative Support02:43:04.240 - 11:41:56 AM; The Republican side unites in support, bound by oath to the Constitution, which grants young people the right to self-defense without age or maturity restrictions.
HB1793: Clerk Vote02:43:04.240 - 11:41:56 AM; The roll is called, with votes: Vice Chair Rhodess yes, Representative Pru yes, Representative Lels yes, Representative Devoid yes, Representative Pquette yes, Representative Sabor Schwiner yes, Representative Harriet Gothright no, Representative Muse no, Representative Newman no, Representative Murphy no, Clerk no, Representative Shear no, Chairman Roy yes. Motion carries 7-6.
HB1697: Mike Belchure, representing Carol Ford, Wakefield Support02:45:46.080 - 11:44:38 AM; The sponsor introduces HB1697, noting it passed the House last year but was replaced by an amendment in the Senate. The bill uses firearms rights to challenge the Wickard v. Filburn Supreme Court decision expanding the commerce clause, aiming to reinvigorate federalism. Firearms are ideal as they are enumerated rights and can be regulated in-state without crossing boundaries, unlike agriculture. Ensures in-state firearms via marking, serialization, and penalties against export.
HB1697: Representative Timothy Han, Durham Oppose02:54:02.160 - 11:52:54 AM; Representative Han opposes the perennial bill as extreme wishful thinking. Firearms are easily exportable despite markings like 'For New Hampshire use only; export is criminal.' Questions enforcement, liability for sellers, and serial number tracking across states. Calls it a bad bill that criminals won't obey, predicting it will return annually.
HB1697: J.R. Hole, Acting President, New Hampshire Firearms Coalition Support02:57:12.560 - 11:56:04 AM; Former Representative Hole supports the bill, citing Article 1 Section 8 of the US Constitution limits Congress's powers, with no mention of firearms regulation. Argues the commerce clause has been overextended; manufacturing in-state does not impact interstate commerce. Urges passage.
HB1697: James Gaffney Support03:00:21.439 - 11:59:13 AM; James Gaffney supports, explaining the commerce clause was meant to ensure unimpeded commerce, not restrict it, as in colonial examples like Rhode Island. Current application is unconstitutional; the bill aligns with constitutional intent.
HB1697: Attorney Penny Dean, Concord NH Support03:01:56.720 - 12:00:48 PM; Attorney Dean supports with a caveat to strengthen language against federal regulation under Article 1 Section 8. Argues people break laws regardless (e.g., transporting guns to Massachusetts), but the bill enables affordable in-state manufacturing with accountability via serialization. Addresses interstate sales restrictions, noting complexities for Massachusetts residents and draconian laws deterring dealers.
HB1697: Unnamed Federal Firearms Licensee Information Only03:07:40.000 - 12:06:32 PM; The licensee clarifies federal laws: handguns must ship to buyer's state FFL; rifles/shotguns can be sold directly if lawful in buyer's state, but burden is on seller. Prudent to ship to avoid Massachusetts lawsuits due to complex laws, even for low-capacity items.
HB1697: Chair Vote03:10:01.600 - 12:08:53 PM; The chair opens executive session on HB1697, makes motion of ought to pass, seconded. Session pauses for five minutes.
HB1697: Representative Sher Oppose03:10:01.600 - 12:08:53 PM; Representative Sher argues gun manufacturing involves interstate materials, falling under commerce clause. Notes federal choice to regulate firearms but could regulate others like pencils.
HB1697: Chairman Information Only03:17:34.960 - 12:16:26 PM; Reopened the executive session on HB1697. Noted the motion to pass was seconded and Representative Shear had spoken. Called for further discussion, seeing none, asked the clerk to call the roll. Motion to pass carried with 7 yes votes and 6 no votes. Representative Shear to prepare the committee report by the end of the week. Closed the executive session.
HB1699: Bill Sponsor (Representative) Support03:18:40.720 - 12:17:32 PM; Introduced HB1699, clarifying that possessing certain firearms on mechanically powered boats at no wake or headway speed does not constitute an offense under RSA 207:7. Emphasized that the bill focuses on dangerous conduct rather than technicalities, does not change hunting rules or possession rights, and maintains all safety prohibitions. Recommended two amendments: restore the law enforcement exception in paragraph 4 (lines 8-15) due to a drafting error, and strike a broad sentence in the disabled persons section to avoid ambiguity and tension with other statutes. Urged recommendation as ought to pass with amendments to improve clarity and reduce accidental criminal exposure.
HB1699: Attorney Penny Dean, Concord, NH Support03:24:45.120 - 12:23:37 PM; Supported the concept of allowing loaded firearms in vehicles, citing past issues with Fish and Game conservation officers. Expressed concern about the final language, particularly suggesting striking lines 8-15 in Roman 4 for clarity. Noted receiving a proposed amendment and planned to review statutes and reply in writing. Highlighted personal experience carrying a sidearm while hunting for safety against 'two-legged creatures' and wanted assurance against poaching or illegal hunting charges.
HB1699: Colonel Jordan, Chief of Law Enforcement, NH Fish and Game Oppose03:26:25.520 - 12:25:17 PM; The Commission voted to oppose HB1699 due to concerns about excluding the law enforcement exception (now addressed by sponsor) and differing definitions of 'loaded firearm' from the 2019 rewrite in RSA 207:11-14A. Preferred the sponsor's clearer definition and suggested incorporating it into RSA 207. Expressed worry that the bill might lead duck hunters to believe they can shoot at headway speed, potentially creating criminals despite clear statutes. Recommended adding language explicitly prohibiting discharge in pursuit of wild animals at headway speed for safety, ethics, and fair chase. Explained dangers of shooting at headway speed due to variable speeds, tunnel vision, and changing backgrounds.
HB1365: Bill Sponsor (Don) Support03:32:12.239 - 12:31:04 PM; Introduced HB1365, clarifying that the application form under RSA 596-A shall not require more information than the December 2009 DSP-85 form, avoiding unnecessary fields like occupation, employer references, and broad consent releases that are not enforced but appear mandatory. Explained that applicants may walk away due to perceived requirements, despite no denials for blanks. Stated the bill aligns the form with practice and legislative intent, promoting fairness without changing eligibility or background checks. No amendments suggested; urged ought to pass.
HB1365: Lieutenant Mary Caterbridge, NH State Police Information Only03:40:45.920 - 12:39:37 PM; Stood neutral on HB1365. Noted NH State Police oversee non-resident pistol licenses more than resident ones (handled by local chiefs/selectmen). Compared 2009 form (asking more, e.g., previous employer/address) to current 2017 form. Confirmed they run NICS/federal background checks using demographics only, without calling references or using employer info for non-residents.
HB1365: Representative Henry Gison, Hillsborough 29th District Support03:42:43.920 - 12:41:35 PM; Supported HB1365 for protecting privacy by not coercing unnecessary information. Clarified the bill does not address medical/behavioral health disclosure, which would require separate legislation involving HIPAA and self-disclosure. Emphasized streamlining voluntary disclosures to respect privacy rights.
HB1446: Representative Tom Manning, Hillsborough Support03:44:46.239 - 12:43:38 PM; Introduced HB1446, arguing it protects Second Amendment rights for medical cannabis users under state law, aligning with the Rohrabacher amendment (since 2014) that bars DOJ from prosecuting state-compliant cannabis activities. Referenced ATF Form 4473 warning on federal illegality despite state laws. Noted Ninth Circuit ruling in US v. Macintosh supporting state laws. Handed off to bill author.
HB1446: Nathaniel Gur, Sandwich, NH; NH Cannabis Party Executive Director Support03:46:39.760 - 12:45:31 PM; Detailed federal illegality of cannabis and firearm possession for users, with up to 5-year penalties and 10-year penalty for lying on ATF Form 4473. Explained Rohrabacher amendment prohibits DOJ funds from interfering with state medical programs. HB1446 revises RSA 126-X to include Second Amendment rights as integral to the program, barring DOJ interference, affirming state rights, and prohibiting state/local enforcement of federal bans. Offered 50-page legal research supporting merits and potential appeals to Supreme Court. Pioneering strategy; authorizes AG defense, with Second Amendment groups potentially assisting.
HB1446: Representative Heath Howard Support03:59:10.000 - 12:58:02 PM; Supported HB1446 for fairness, noting federal rescheduling to Schedule 3 would treat cannabis like other medications, but current law forces patients to choose between care and firearm rights. Argued no similar restrictions for opioids/benzodiazepines; therapeutic cannabis patients deserve equal treatment. Emphasized policy failure in discouraging regulated programs, undermining trust. Stated federal restrictions punish users unconstitutionally; bill ensures consistency without expanding access.
HB1446: Representative Henry Gison, Hillsborough 29th District Support04:02:23.920 - 1:01:15 PM; Supported HB1446, echoing prior speaker. Shared veteran community concerns in legal states turning away from prescribed cannabis due to firearm passion. Personal story of aunt with cancer avoiding legal medical marijuana due to insurance/rights fears during chemo. Argued government should not restrict therapy or rights; state can lead on rescheduling despite supremacy clause risks.
HB1446: Matt Simon, Granite Leaf Cannabis Support04:04:49.040 - 1:03:41 PM; Supported HB1446 to clarify misconceptions; NH has no state penalty for cannabis patients possessing firearms—it's federal only. No known cases of rights denial from program participation. Existing RSA 126-X protections prohibit sharing patient info with non-recognizing agencies (e.g., ATF). Bill strengthens protections; encourages registration for legal state access without implying state undermines gun rights. Addressed patient fears driving illegal use; suggested clarifying application attestations.
HB1446: Lieutenant Mary Caterbridge, NH State Police Oppose04:14:56.239 - 1:13:48 PM; Opposed HB1446 due to federal supremacy; cannot override. Noted liability for individuals (lying on forms), FFL dealers (losing licenses if selling knowingly), and police transferring firearms—potential federal charges including conspiracy. Emphasized 'knowing' element risks for all in chain.
HB1446: Attorney Penny Dean, Concord, NH Oppose04:16:17.680 - 1:15:09 PM; Opposed HB1446 based on representing clients; advised against firearm possession for medical cannabis users due to federal prison risk, comparing to cocaine dealing. Criticized marijuana industry for promoting despite federal dangers.
HB1446: Attorney Penny Dean, Concord, NH Oppose04:16:17.680 - 1:15:09 PM; The speaker continues her testimony warning about the risks of the bill, emphasizing that federal law prohibits firearm possession by marijuana users regardless of state law. She explains that even transferring firearms to such individuals is illegal, and people often seek favorable opinions from unreliable sources. As a lawyer, she provides formal legal analyses to clients, holding herself accountable, and criticizes quick, inaccurate advice. She believes the bill could harm people by misleading them into non-compliance with federal law, and urges the committee to protect citizens instead.
HB1454: Jay Markell, Prime Sponsor Support05:04:34.240 - 2:03:26 PM; Jay Markell, a practicing attorney with over 20 years of experience in criminal and family law, introduces HB1454 as a measure to address gaps in current statutes regarding firearms possession in violation of domestic violence protective orders under RSA 173-B. Prompted by the murder-suicide of Marisol Fuentes and Mr. Gleason, the bill criminalizes knowing possession of firearms or ammunition in violation of such orders: class A misdemeanor for first offense, class B felony for subsequent. It also amends bail statutes (RSA 159) to treat these as qualifying offenses presuming danger, working with new bail laws to allow detention beyond arraignment. Not a strict liability offense, it requires knowing possession. Markell cites statistics: 3,476 domestic violence petitions in 2024, mostly granted, and highlights the prevalence of domestic violence cases. He references a pending case where a defendant concealed firearms and the Attorney General's report on the Fuentes case, where failure to surrender a gun contributed to the tragedy. The bill aligns with US v. Rahimi (2024), upholding temporary firearm deprivations in domestic violence cases without violating the Second Amendment.
HB1454: Aaron Penasich, Hollis, NH Oppose05:17:16.718 - 2:16:08 PM; Aaron Penasich opposes HB1454, arguing that it assumes future criminality based on a court order without a hearing, which he views as unjust. The bill's analysis indicates it criminalizes firearm possession in violation of surrender orders and triggers a presumption of danger, preemptively punishing individuals.
HB1454: Nicholas Thomas, Alexandria, NH Oppose05:18:31.600 - 2:17:23 PM; Nicholas Thomas opposes the bill, citing his experience with a false stalking petition that led to a temporary protective order without a hearing, forcing him to surrender firearms and ammunition, impacting his self-protection and gunsmith hobby. The court later found the accusations false. He argues that stiffening penalties is only constitutional if laws require a hearing before firearm surrender to ensure due process.
HB1454: Attorney Penny Dean, Concord, NH Oppose05:20:31.360 - 2:19:23 PM; Attorney Penny Dean strongly opposes HB1454, describing it as horrible and unnecessary. She explains the ex parte nature of protective orders, which are often rubber-stamped, leading to immediate police seizure of firearms without due process. Defendants get only 3-5 days and 30 minutes for a hearing, insufficient to contest detailed allegations. Violations are currently non-bailable, resulting in immediate arrest and detention until a judge decides, regardless of wealth. She notes standard procedures demand full surrender upon order issuance, even for minor alleged violations like emails. Dean argues existing statutes already provide protections, and the bill exacerbates unfair treatment of defendants, often men, without adequate defense opportunities.
HB1387: Lauren Celig, Representative, Durham, NH Support05:24:26.000 - 2:23:18 PM; Lauren Celig, representing Durham (Strafford District 10), introduces HB1387 with co-sponsor Senator Deborah Alchiller to repeal limited liability protections for firearms and ammunition manufacturers under RSA 508:21. Acknowledging the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) since 2005, she argues it disincentivizes safety and accountability, shielding the industry from lawsuits for harms caused by defective products. Exceptions exist, but litigation is protracted; states are enacting laws for responsible conduct standards. She compares to other industries: car brakes, Sig Sauer's P320 unintended discharges (voluntary upgrade for 500,000+ guns, no recall), laundry detergent recall (8 million units), bounce house (after fatality), bed rails (after two deaths), and GM ignition switches. These faced accountability without immunity. Immunity encourages negligence, discourages innovations, leaves victims uncompensated, and advantages irresponsible firms. Repeal would apply consumer protections, allowing suits for harms from irresponsible practices. Gun violence is the leading cause of death for kids/teens; Sandy Hook families sued Remington after years over marketing. She submits additional statistics and details to the clerk.
HB1387: Representative David Muse, Portsmouth Support05:30:47.040 - 2:29:39 PM; Representative Muse explains that HB1387 repeals HB551, passed last year with poor public notice, which granted Sig Sauer a narrow liability exemption for the P320 pistol to prevent lawsuits over defects. He notes it was rushed through to block lawsuits, primarily from law enforcement and military users who trusted the brand. The repeal aims to right this wrong by allowing their day in court, without affecting the general liability exemption for NH gun manufacturers and dealers under RSA 508:21.
HB1387: Representative Timothy Han, Durham Support05:33:41.520 - 2:32:33 PM; Representative Han supports HB1387 to repeal the unnecessary and duplicative RSA 507-D:6 added by HB551, which was pushed by firearm manufacturers with threats to leave the state. He argues no company should get a 'get out of jail free card,' and people should sue for safety issues. He notes RSA 508:21 already provides broad liability protection since 2004, and lawsuits over P320 defects have been filed outside NH without state law interference, making the exemption redundant.
HB1387: Representative Granger Oppose05:36:42.000 - 2:35:34 PM; Representative Granger, sponsor of the original HB551 amendment, opposes the repeal, noting it improved the bill and was signed into law. He compares the P320 to the 1911 pistol, arguing modern striker-fired firearms like the P320 are safer without manual safeties or firing pin blocks that could cause accidental discharge if dropped. He carries a Beretta PX4 without external safety and believes forcing such features reduces functionality, urging the committee to find the repeal inexpedient to legislate.
HB1387: Kathleen Slover, Portsmouth Support05:39:18.240 - 2:38:10 PM; Slover supports HB1387, arguing manufacturers must be held liable for products even if functioning as designed, citing the Ford Pinto's flammable fuel tank as an example of unreasonable risks. She references unintentional discharges of holstered P320s, like in Virginia, and notes the law strips gun owners' rights to sue for known or future issues. She mentions New Jersey's lawsuit seeking a P320 recall for its propensity to discharge unintentionally, emphasizing courts should decide such cases as a constitutional right, and that the law harms consumers despite benefiting Sig Sauer's business.
HB1387: Jay Simpkin, NH firearms dealer Oppose05:41:58.320 - 2:40:50 PM; Simpkin, a licensed firearms dealer for over 30 years, opposes HB1387 as it exposes him to lawsuits. He claims the bill enables funding from Michael Bloomberg via groups like Moms Demand Action to sue firearm businesses out of existence, though interrupted for speculating on intent. He argues the testimony proves the need for state protection alongside federal laws like PLCAA, which failed to shield Remington, warning that without it, manufacturers will raise prices to cover legal costs, ultimately harming gun owners and the industry.
HB1387: Miss Dean Oppose05:44:15.680 - 2:43:07 PM; Miss Dean opposes the repeal, citing the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act's failure to protect Remington from lawsuits in Connecticut as evidence that state-level protection is needed. She argues no other lawful product, except perhaps opioids, faces such litigation tactics aimed at bankrupting the industry. Without protection, surviving manufacturers will increase prices to fund defenses, affecting consumers, and emphasizes that lawsuits for actual defects are still possible, but the tactic is to eliminate guns by suing owners and makers out of existence.
HB1749: Seth King, Representative Support05:50:08.878 - 2:49:00 PM; Representative Seth King, the bill sponsor, explains HB1749's provisions: it reinstates the death penalty for capital murder, first-degree, and second-degree murder, while allowing for lesser sentences than the current mandatory life without parole, providing more judicial leeway. He shares his evolving views on the death penalty, influenced by heinous crimes, and provides examples like the rape and death of Natalie Shder in London (first-degree murder under NH law) and the stabbing of Ireina Zerutska on a train in Charlotte (second-degree murder), arguing these warrant the death penalty to avoid taxpayer costs of lifelong incarceration. He acknowledges debates but asserts his personal support.
HB1749: Bishop Rob Herschfeld, Episcopal Diocese of New Hampshire Oppose06:07:52.320 - 3:06:44 PM; As a Christian leader, Bishop Herschfeld opposes reinstating the death penalty, appealing to the conscience of Christian legislators. He argues that the execution of Jesus teaches that violence is not countered by further violence, but by love even for enemies. He states the death penalty corrupts society's moral health, offers no protection for public safety, and wastes resources better spent on education and mental health.
HB1749: Bishop Labashi Oppose06:10:40.798 - 3:09:32 PM; Bishop Labashi opposes reinstating the death penalty, recalling New Hampshire's prior repeal after extensive debate as a relic of a bygone era. He critiques HB1749's mitigating circumstances, which would revive endless debates, impose high financial costs (millions per case) amid budget strains for housing, education, and healthcare, and notes unequal application, such as in child murder cases. He urges redirecting funds to prevent crimes like child trafficking.
HB1749: Winnie, Innocence Project New England Oppose06:14:43.840 - 3:13:35 PM; Winnie, from the Innocence Project with New England Innocence Project partners, opposes death penalty reinstatement due to risks of executing innocents from flaws like misconduct, misidentification, and false confessions. She cites 202 death row exonerations since 1973 and executed innocents like Cameron Todd Willingham, urging focus on preventing wrongful convictions instead.
HB1749: Paul Hildwin, former death row inmate Oppose06:17:08.400 - 3:16:00 PM; Paul Hildwin shares his wrongful conviction in Florida in 1985 for first-degree murder due to poor representation, prosecutorial misconduct, and false FBI testimony. DNA evidence in 2003 excluded him, leading to exoneration after 35 years (29 on death row), including a near-execution in 1990. He lost family and health, meeting other innocents on death row, emphasizing the irreversible risk of the death penalty.
HB1642: Lauren Celig, Representative from Durham Support06:21:45.040 - 3:20:37 PM; Representative Lauren Celig supports HB1642, which allows temporary removal of firearms from individuals showing suicidal ideation or threats to harm others, addressing gaps in current laws. She shares stories of local tragedies: a mother killing her family and herself, a domestic violence murder-suicide, and another involving a child. Citing statistics on firearm suicides (second leading cause of death for ages 10-34, 89% of NH firearm deaths), she compares it to harm reduction for opioids and cancer prevention, arguing the bill adds 'speed bumps' to prevent gun violence, as 20 other states have similar laws. She submits additional written details.
HB1642: Representative David Muer, Portsmouth Support06:34:46.320 - 3:33:38 PM; Representative Muer shares his experience from a White House convening on gun violence prevention after the Lewiston shooting, emphasizing the haunting impact on legislators. He discusses Maine's yellow flag law issues where only law enforcement could petition for weapon removal, contributing to the incident. He explains HB1642's temporary and final orders, stressing due process protections, evidentiary hearings within days, and court rulings upholding such measures for public safety. He addresses questions on hearings before gun removal, noting ex parte orders for imminent threats with a full hearing within 5 days, and provisions for accelerated hearings. He argues for compromises on due process in urgent safety matters, highlighting the bill's careful drafting paralleling domestic violence protections as a New Hampshire solution.
HB1642: Representative Timothy Han, Durham Support06:44:50.080 - 3:43:42 PM; As co-sponsor, Representative Han describes HB1642 as allowing temporary firearm removal from individuals in mental health crises to prevent harm to self or others. He notes petitioners (law enforcement or family) must prove the person's state in court via a detailed multi-part procedure with due process. It requires more than a single bad day and won't surprise those aware of their issues. He acknowledges it's not 100% effective, citing a Berlin case where weapons were surrendered but harm occurred, but argues it reduces likelihood, similar to criminal proceedings. He urges passing the bill this year.
HB1642: Aaron Pincasich, Hollis, New Hampshire Firearms Coalition Oppose06:47:42.638 - 3:46:34 PM; Pincasich opposes HB1642, claiming it violates NH Constitution Article 2A and US Constitution amendments 1,2,4,5,6, lacking due process. He describes scenarios where petitioners can lead to unannounced police seizures at night without defense opportunity. He notes requirements for petitioners to detail firearms and ammo, impractical for owners with many guns, and no provisions for storage or return conditions of valuable items. He argues firearms are effective for suicide but so are other methods like knives or pills, questioning the focus on guns.
HB1642: Kathleen Slover, Portsmouth Support06:50:42.080 - 3:49:34 PM; Slover urges passage of HB1642, submitting an op-ed from Lewiston Commission director supporting red flag laws after the shooting, empowering families. She cites Maine's 60% voter approval and 75% NH poll support for protective orders. Referencing FBI reports on active shooter behaviors, she notes low police reporting rates. With rising gun deaths (22% US, 48% NH), many suicides, she provides a 2024 study on ERPOs as effective suicide prevention with due process. Post-Bruen, US v. Rahimi affirms constitutionality. She states most petitions are by law enforcement, who prioritize safety over seizures.
HB1642: Shirley Dawson, Plaistow Oppose06:54:02.718 - 3:52:54 PM; Dawson, a former mental health counselor, domestic violence survivor, firearms instructor, and Women's Defense League chair, opposes HB1642 for violating Fourth Amendment via unlawful search and seizure based on opinions, not evidence. Relatives' allegations lack veracity and cloud professional assessment. The bill ignores underlying mental health by only removing guns, leaving other means like knives or cars, potentially forcing alternative suicides. It discourages seeking help due to penalties and amid 2-3 week mental health wait times.
HB1642: Miss Morin Oppose06:56:50.400 - 3:55:42 PM; Morin calls HB1642 discriminatory against law-abiding gun owners in civil cases where petitioners can make unsubstantiated claims leading to firearm confiscation. It's a 'thought police' bill enabling law enforcement overreach. For suicide, she suggests improving involuntary admissions or reopening mental institutions instead. It violates protected rights, especially self-defense under Second Amendment and NH 2A. She claims it's not grassroots but pushed by Michael Bloomberg's Everytown with over $1M spent, despite NH's safety, urging inexpedient to legislate.
HB1642: JD Lewis Oppose07:00:26.160 - 3:59:18 PM; Lewis opposes HB1642, arguing guns don't kill, people do, and determined individuals will find other means like machetes or knives even if guns are confiscated. He empathizes with related tragedies but insists confiscation won't prevent intent.
HB1642: Paul Sclaric, Out of Lender Support07:02:28.240 - 4:01:20 PM; Paul Sclaric testified in support of HB1642, advocating for red flag laws in New Hampshire. He shared his wife's experience as a survivor of gun violence: 20 years ago, her brother, facing eviction and deep depression, attempted suicide with a legally owned gun and survived with the bullet still in his head. He emphasized the lack of mental health resources available at the time and the family's trauma. Sclaric highlighted gun violence as the leading cause of death for children and young adults aged 0-18, and stressed that red flag laws could prevent such tragedies by removing firearms and providing help. He noted that other states like Maine have implemented these laws and urged New Hampshire to follow suit to save lives.
HB1642: Mr. Simpkin Oppose07:05:30.240 - 4:04:22 PM; Mr. Simpkin opposed HB1642, arguing that the bill is based on provable falsehoods. He contended that removing firearms from distressed individuals does not prevent harm, given the abundance of half a billion firearms in the U.S., many obtained outside federally licensed dealers. He asserted that court orders won't stop determined individuals, as the state has no duty to protect average citizens and lacks sufficient secure facilities for dangerous people. Simpkin emphasized that bad actors will find ways to obtain firearms regardless, rendering the bill ineffective.
HB1642: Ms. Dean Oppose07:08:13.600 - 4:07:05 PM; Ms. Dean opposed HB1642, focusing on due process violations and practical flaws. She criticized page 7, lines 21-24, noting that receipts for seized firearms and ammunition become public court records, exposing serial numbers and compromising privacy even under temporary orders. She highlighted strict timelines for hearings (e.g., 30 minutes) without provisions to waive them for adequate defense, and courts' current overload pushing rushed proceedings. Dean argued that ex parte processes, immediate sheriff visits without notice, and provisions allowing venue changes (judge shopping) undermine fairness. She described the bill as having bad due process mechanically and offered to write a detailed treatise on its defects.
HB1642: Captain John Barry Oppose07:12:35.840 - 4:11:27 PM; Captain John Barry, a 26-year military veteran in intelligence with experience in 35 countries, opposed HB1642 based on personal experience. He described losing all weapons and having his security clearance suspended due to an unwarranted accusation under a similar red flag process, severely impacting his ability to protect himself and his work in Ukraine. Barry argued that deeming someone a threat leads to a slippery slope, with insufficient time (30 minutes) or evaluation (e.g., 5-day psych ward) to assess properly. He viewed the issue as mental health-related, not firearms-related, and concurred with prior opposition, emphasizing his clean record and global perspective on gun violence.
HB1642: Karen Leo Hill, Executive Counselor District 2 Oppose07:16:01.200 - 4:14:53 PM; Karen Leo Hill, Executive Counselor for District 2 representing 81 cities and towns in western and central New Hampshire, opposed HB1749, HB1413, and HB1737, which seek to reinstate and expand the death penalty. She argued these bills reverse New Hampshire's 2019 repeal, imposing costly, constitutionally risky, and value-inconsistent state power. With life without parole already ensuring safety, the death penalty adds irreversible punishment without improving outcomes. She cited fiscal notes showing millions in costs per case for capital litigation, diverting funds from public safety, mental health, and infrastructure, and added her voice to others opposing reintroduction.
HB1642: Christine Rockefeller Oppose07:19:02.958 - 4:17:54 PM; Christine Rockefeller opposed HB1749 and related bills reinstating capital punishment for murder and other offenses, noting the 2019 veto-proof repeal led by Representative Renie Cushing, a murder survivor's son. She argued revival tramples Cushing's legacy and values, as the death penalty doesn't heal grief, restore losses, or enhance safety but extends trauma for victims, witnesses, jurors, staff, and communities through endless legal processes. Rockefeller quoted Cushing: 'If we let those who turn us into killers, then evil triumphs and we all lose.' She urged inexpedient to legislate (ITL) all such bills for accountability without cruelty.
Unclear: Committee Chair Information Only07:21:31.440 - 4:20:23 PM; The committee chair announced the recess of the hearing on HB1642 and related bills due to a prior announcement requiring legal notice for continuation. The hearing will resume next Friday, the 23rd, with time to be determined and noticed in the calendar. The chair apologized for the inconvenience and noted a learning curve in managing the session. Tomorrow's scheduled business, including a death penalty bill, will proceed at 10:00 a.m.

Roy, Terry(Chairman)(R)[B]2025	Murray, Alissandra(Clerk)(D)[D-]2025	Rhodes, Jennifer(V Chairman)(R)[B+]2025
Harriott-Gathright, Linda(D)[CT]2025	Proulx, Mark(R)[C+]2025	Lascelles, Richard(R)[B+]2025
Morency, Pete(R)[B]2025	Paquette, Kathleen(R)[B+]2025	Murphy, Nancy(D)[CT]2025
Newman, Ray(D)[F]2025	Meuse, David(D)[F]2025	Devoid, Ricky(R)[A-]2025
Scherr, Buzz(D)[D-]2025	Sabourin dit Choinière, Matt(R)[A-]2025